Posts from Sacred Haven of Debauchery Auto-translated

You approve of such outfits on 14-year-old girls.

So, if I criticized your candidate on similar grounds, would you still understand me and not argue?

But you expressed some very controversial thoughts about my picture.

How does determining age and evaluating a face relate to approving costumes, which are not taken into account when evaluating?

But since there's nudity here, and that's why I perceived the picture as just another joke, I lowered the score for those reasons.

I remembered how people used to make fun of Klov because of such pictures.
I remembered that Siv sent something similar to the photo contest last year. It's strange that it only occurred to him this year to post something like this.
I remembered the names of the contests.
So, it was a "cute kids" contest.

Everyone has their own perception, concept of beauty, and evaluation of appearance; otherwise, we would have to argue with almost everyone.

What specific thoughts do you consider subversive?

Has anyone played Heroes 7?

What kind of flame war is this? It barely resembles a typical "Argument_with_Arandor.txt". For now.

Well, that's a twist! Actually, you should be the one answering this question, since you're the one saying you lowered the rating specifically because of the costume, even though you initially claimed it was due to the character's perceived underage appearance.

So, is that how you phrased your joke? And there's no need to ramble on about "this was after my post on the contest" - if it were a joke, you would have said, "Siver, you're getting worked up over nothing, I was just kidding." But that didn't happen; instead, we see something close to an outright accusation of something that people in our country could be beaten, urinated on, imprisoned, castrated, or killed for.

The rating is lowered not for just one reason, if that's what you mean. The original version would have received a 3-4 rating, but based on what? The issue is with the face, which I don't find appealing, due to its "age" and/or other factors (face shape, etc.), and we could argue about this endlessly. Most likely, each detail played a partial role, taking away 1-2 points, and it wouldn't be entirely correct to separate them. The rating dropped from 3-4 to 1 not because of the costume, but because of its absence, and the perception of the picture as a humorous option; these factors are related.

I mentioned Klov in my previous evaluations, comparing his content to yours. I simply pointed out the fact that there is such a similarity in tastes.

I shouldn't have added the part about children to the sentences with memories; I separated them for a reason. It was a humorous remark addressed to everyone.

Baskets with what? Kittens?

What kind of similarity?

A basket filled with what? Kittens?

I have already expressed my opinion regarding how people perceive individuals of different ages, what criteria are used to evaluate them, and so on.

And there is a difference between an image that simply shows a face and the one you had.

He didn't share anything with me.

Yes, it's more vivid. But as I said, the same situation would likely occur with any other image. There is a difference between these options, and it would be inaccurate to perceive them as identical, in my opinion. Otherwise, we'll soon have people claiming that Soviet cartoons promote smoking.

Who said I'm doing this intentionally? I saw it, made a conclusion, and assessed it.

"If she were dressed, I wouldn't try to guess her age."

So, you're no longer disputing the fact that comparing her to a clown is an accusation of pedophilia?

I don't know where you got that from. Estimating age always happens automatically. Just like determining a person's gender, and so on. It just played a bigger role in this case.

The comparison was based on specific details.

This happens every year, for the Clover guys. Alex said it all.