Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Decided to create this thread because there isn't one for discussing the game.
Sergh
In my opinion, the Lich is the best... the bonus is really good.
But in version 3.51, the bonus isn't very good. The Lich doesn't have morality, healing and mind spells don't affect him, and he's also immune to poison, but he takes damage from Holy Word. And it's unclear how he restores health in battle if healing doesn't affect him, or does he have a vampiric attack?:confused:
Sergh
20 years ago
Auto-translated
Magnus
I decided to create this thread because there isn't one for discussing the game.
But in version 3.51, the bonus isn't very good. A Lich doesn't have morality, healing and mind-affecting spells don't work on it, and it's also immune to poison, but it takes damage from Holy Word. And it's not clear how it restores health in battle if healing doesn't work on it, or does it have a vampiric attack?:confused:
Firstly, healing does work on it... (I played as a Lich, and I even had a life skill branch... it healed just fine...) Secondly, I think that being immune to mind-affecting spells is a "+" and not a "-"... I can live without it.
And the damage from Holy Word... how much is it? I'm willing to sacrifice that if it's the only downside. :o :o :o
I've always found the opposite situation unpleasant... I cast Plague, and it starts killing me... and so on.
Do you have version 3.0 or 3.51?:confused: In 3.0, he can be healed because he doesn't have the ability that he has in 3.51.
Sorry, I didn't think about that... To be honest, I not only didn't think about it, but I also didn't know about this difference in versions...
By the way, where can I see this version? I've played various modifications, both pirated and legitimate, and I haven't paid much attention to the versions.
Thanks for pointing out the version differences... I still haven't found a way to check which version I have... (although I suspect it's not a very recent one...)
I don't understand... although I'm not stupid... I click on the link... I searched the entire site... and... what's the point of this...?
Have you opened the "changes" link? If you see the same changes there, then you have version 3.51. By the way, if you have "Whirlwinds of War," that's version 3.0.
...and if you have a campaign about Alexander the Great, Excalibur, then it's 3.51.
And this is something that can damage your reputation ;) and a punishment should be given! :) The campaign about Alexander the Great and Excalibur is purely a pirated version based on version 3.0. By installing it, you risk a lot...
You can get a bad reputation for this ;) and receive a punishment! :) The campaign about Macedonian and Excalibur is a pure pirated version based on version 3.0. By installing it, you risk a lot...
Sorry, I made a mistake:o
RomaShSh
20 years ago
Auto-translated
and in general, the fourth game is quite fun and doesn't get boring!
Actually, the fourth game is quite fun and doesn't get boring!
Well, yeah. After watching the yellow, faded menu for about half an hour, along with the "sun-baked" landscape and the heroes' swollen faces, you'll immediately want to shoot yourself with a bow. An onion bow:)
Yeah, right. After watching the faded yellow menu, the "scorched" landscape, and the swollen faces of the heroes for about half an hour, you immediately want to shoot yourself with a bow. An onion bow:)
Well, whatever! Play Heroes 5 if you want, who's stopping you? I personally like Heroes 4!
