Posts from Forum
Just another forum user who likes to share his thoughts, whether appropriate or not. He seems like a decent person.
You're talking as if you're describing yourself.
HE will always fulfill his obligations, and there's no need to write nonsense. For him, it's not about the money. He is one of the wealthiest people in Russia. MAY GOD BLESS US SO THAT WE LIVE AS WELL AS HE DOES.
I couldn't find anything about "Monster Week" in the rules. Cobra mentioned that there used to be a rule about not being able to buy monsters of level 6-7. Does having +5 Angels in each Castle, or other monsters, really not matter?
HE is one of the wealthiest people in Russia. May we all live as well as he does.
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
An oligarch playing Heroes?
Чуть длиннее: Фонд Дендроидов
-------------------------------------------------------------
На ощупь пьют эльфийские стрелки!
Нам это идеально подходит (c)
Это вам не шутки - нажрался Дуст в маршрутке! (с)
Пишите на udd@otso.city
Твиттер СНГ
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
Question: Is it allowed for Fairies to cast spells while the Knight's Shield is equipped (NOT in Anarchy mode)? The game allows casting (when pressing G).
The main thing is that the computer shouldn't be able to cast spells against you. Otherwise, under equal conditions, it's fine, and cases where a player has a Fairy are extremely rare.
Still under the fresh impression of an outrageous act… (crossed out). Passing through this station, I was deeply disturbed by the following… (crossed out). The following outrageous incident occurred before my eyes, vividly illustrating the state of our railway system… (the rest is crossed out, except for the signature).
A.P. Chekhov. "Complaint Book"
After my Ghost Dragons sometimes aged (a known ability, expressed by reducing health) Lea de Vuz's dragons, she cast Dispel Magic on the aged stack. However, she was wearing the Father Dragon's Might, neither she nor I had the Sphere of Vulnerability equipped, and yet she was removing the aging effect even from her own Azure Dragons! This is a clear violation of the game's rules, something a human player could not do.
I suspect (just as it happens with the sudden flights of AI heroes when there is no spell or artifact that grants it), that this is not intentional cheating, but simply that the game developers, while programming the AI's behavior, forgot to include some checks in the code. But, of course, this can only be said for sure by looking at the source code (unfortunately, it is unlikely that they will be "declassified" anytime soon).
I immediately took screenshots to make sure for myself and prove to everyone that I wasn't imagining things. This happened in at least 3 different battles (the location of the corpses of my units and the number of creatures in the stacks confirm this) and on different dragons. I can also attach the save file, but I cannot guarantee that the same thing will happen to you: for this to happen, the "aging" effect must trigger on the Ghost Dragons.
(Василь Симоненко. Люди – прекрасні)
Removing Spells
Works on any creatures protected from magic, including Black Dragons. Removes Disease, Petrify, Paralyze, and Slow.
(Василь Симоненко. Люди – прекрасні)
I decided to check. The easiest and most illustrative way to do this was on a test micro-map. Yes, it really works that way: I cast Prayer on my green dragons, then remove it.
The game manual says:
But this is still nonsense, because one contradicts the other. Apparently, the game developers' left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing. Because immunity to magic should not have exceptions. Or else, Dispel should not be level 1, but 5 or 6. I don't even remember ever being able to remove spells from enemy creatures with magic immunity, except when I have the Orb of Vulnerability. Are you saying that I've been playing Heroes incorrectly for X years? :eek: How can I live now? :)
Does your rigid thinking allow you to doubt the sanity of the developers' thinking, but not your own?
always!!! I will always repeat, for any action there is another!!! point of view from which everything looks very logical and correct.
so here it is!!!
ta-da-da-da - the great secret is revealed!!!
The Dispel spell is cast not on monsters, but on spells. And it is quite logical that the monster's immunity in no way can affect the removal of the spell cast on it. After all, "Dispel" essentially neutralizes a spell that was cast earlier.
But the removal of "Entangle" looks a little illogical. because Entangle is not magic - it is a property. But even here, in the description of this spell, it says that it also removes the effect of properties.
Hmm... can I remove the Double Strike property from Wolf Riders or Vampire Lords? ;)

