BLITZ TOURNAMENT — Tournament history (offline)

RAPER

19 years ago

Auto-translated

I don't understand... how did mIKKi appear in front of me? It's as if he wasn't there before...

In reply to DmitriyAS

Kyle

19 years ago

Auto-translated

Dmitry_A_S;91561

The first two places are taken by IronAxe and VDV_vorever (they showed the same results, so both are placed in the first position). Therefore, the next place to be determined is the third. If there were three identical results in first place, then the next place to be determined would be the fourth, and so on.
Or is it not?

We award places based on the result, and it doesn't matter how many people achieved the same result. In my opinion, this is the correct approach. After all, consider this: You achieved the third result, right? So why should you be in fourth place? And besides, with this approach, it becomes very easy to calculate the ranking. :smile17: Added 2 minutes later

RAPER;91563

I don't understand something... how did mIKKi appear ahead of me =/..... I don't think he was even there....

He was there, but his save was checked a little longer than yours. That's why his result didn't appear in the preliminary results table. Sincerely.

In reply to DmitriyAS

AmberSoler

19 years ago

Auto-translated

Dmitry_A_S;91561

The first two places are taken by IronAxe and VDV_vorever (they showed the same results, so both of them are placed in the first position). Therefore, the next place to be determined is the third one. If there were three identical results in the first place, then the next place to be determined would be the fourth, and so on.
Or is it different?

It can be done that way, but it won't affect the rating, will it? And the final results will depend on the rating... The places are just a conditional concept...

In reply to AmberSoler

DmitriyAS

19 years ago

Auto-translated

AmberSoler;91566

That's also possible, but it won't affect the ranking, right? And the final results will depend on the ranking... Places are just a relative concept...

I also wanted to say that it won't affect the ranking, but I did achieve a result of 4 (after IronAxe, VDV_vorever, Radika, which means I should also take a similar place. That would be more accurate.

In reply to DmitriyAS

Kyle

19 years ago

Auto-translated

Dmitry_A_S;91568

... but I did achieve a result of 4 (after IronAxe, VDV_vorever, Radika, which means I should also take a similar place.
....

It depends on how you count... ;)
If we take the result as the basis, then you are third... but if we take the number of participants who surpassed you as the basis, then yes, you are fourth.
But as I already said, we take the result as the basis.

Sincerely.

In reply to DmitriyAS

AmberSoler

19 years ago

Auto-translated

Dmitry_A_S;91568

I also wanted to say that it won't affect the ranking, but I did achieve a result of 4 (after IronAxe, VDV_vorever, Radika, which means I should also take a similar place. That would be more correct.

In this specific case, you achieved the third result, which is reflected in the table... The place you took doesn't matter. It's not the same thing... Well, the sum of the five stages of the blitz will put everyone in their place... There won't be any coinciding results, I think... :)

2 Kyle. And how do you manage to do everything? :) You don't even let anyone get a word in... :D

BotINKi

19 years ago

Auto-translated

Not really... you take the result as a basis... but the location isn't the result! If it doesn't affect anything, why not do it the right way?

In reply to BotINKi

Kyle

19 years ago

Auto-translated

BotINKi;91572

Not really... you take the result as a basis... but the place isn't the result! If it doesn't affect anything, why not do it the right way?

Well, in reality, the player rating is calculated based on the occupied place and the number of places.

BotINKi;91572

If it doesn't affect anything, why not do it the right way?

And besides, why is it wrong?
After all, you agreed that we count only the result, and the number of people who ended up in one place is not taken into account. Therefore, Dmitry_A_S's place should be third!
Where is the mistake here?

Sincerely.

In reply to Kyle

IronAxe

19 years ago

Auto-translated

Kyle;91573

After all, you agreed that we only consider the result and don't take into account how many people ended up in one place. Therefore, Dmitry_A_S's place should be third!
Where is the mistake here?
Sincerely.

I support Kyle. In fact, there is a podium with the prize-winning places 1, 2, 3. Who cares that 10 people climbed onto the podium for 1st place. They share the first place among themselves. Well, the eleventh participant will be in second place, and the twelfth - in third. Everything is normal.

In reply to Kyle

BotINKi

19 years ago

Auto-translated

Kyle;91573

And besides, why is this incorrect?
After all, you agreed that we only count the result and don't take into account how many people ended up in one place. Therefore, Dmitry_A_S's place should be third!
Where is the mistake here?

Sincerely.

According to generally accepted rules, it is done as Dmitry_A_S said. Since this is a tournament, and there are many of them in sports, here is an example from there - have you ever seen a dozen people (for example) on the winners' podium? If 2 people took first place, then no one gets silver, and the third gets bronze, not silver as you have.

Added 2 minutes later

IronAxe;91576

I support Kyle. In fact, there is such a stand where the prize-winning places 1, 2, 3 are depicted. Who cares that 10 people climbed onto the stand for 1st place. They share the first place among themselves. Well, the eleventh participant will be in second place, and the twelfth in third. Everything is normal.

Where did you see this??? Please provide an example with proof)) I want to laugh...

In reply to BotINKi

IronAxe

19 years ago

Auto-translated

BotINKi;91577

According to generally accepted norms, it is done as Dmitry_A_S said. Since this is a tournament, and there are very many of them in sports, here is an example from there — where have you seen a dozen people (for example) on the podium? If 2 people take first place, then silver is given to no one, and the third person is given bronze, not silver as you have

Well, here neither gold nor silver is in sight for anyone. And they'll just draw up some Grails — it's not like it costs anything :) I haven't seen this anywhere. We'll see here and have a laugh. I wrote that in a joking manner :) But why not? What are we even doing here? Did all the same great athletes gather here or something? Let the organizers do it however is most convenient for them to calculate. Otherwise, there will be all sorts of hassles with the ratings.
PS. But seriously, if 10 people share first place. Okay, so no one gets silver or bronze. But what about the other participants?

BotINKi

19 years ago

Auto-translated

well, the rest will take the places that correspond to their position: he would be 11th then ;) he should have run faster))
and it wouldn't have added any extra work for the organizers...

Kyle

19 years ago

Auto-translated

Dear tournament participants!

At all intermediate stages, places will be determined according to the existing system (i.e., we calculate the result and do not take into account how many people ended up in one place), since the blitz rating is strictly tied to the place.

The final results of the tournament, based on five stages, will be calculated as the sum of the blitz rating for each stage, and the places will be determined according to the generally accepted scheme (i.e., as Dmitry_A_S explained).

Sincerely,

In reply to Kyle

DmitriyAS

19 years ago

Auto-translated

Kyle;91586

The final results of the tournament, across all five stages, will be calculated based on the sum of the blitz rating for each stage, and the rankings will be determined according to the standard scheme (i.e., as Dmitry_A_S explained).

Thank you for drawing conclusions so quickly;).