Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The first two places are taken by IronAxe and VDV_vorever (they showed the same results, so both are placed in the first position). Therefore, the next place to be determined is the third. If there were three identical results in first place, then the next place to be determined would be the fourth, and so on. Or is it not?
We award places based on the result, and it doesn't matter how many people achieved the same result.
In my opinion, this is the correct approach.
After all, consider this:
You achieved the third result, right? So why should you be in fourth place?
And besides, with this approach, it becomes very easy to calculate the ranking. :smile17:
Added 2 minutes later
RAPER;91563
I don't understand something... how did mIKKi appear ahead of me =/..... I don't think he was even there....
He was there, but his save was checked a little longer than yours. That's why his result didn't appear in the preliminary results table.
Sincerely.
Кто состоянием своим доволен, тому жить весело. (с)Алекса́ндр Васи́льевич Суво́ров