Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Dialogues with ModeratorsAuto-translated
I wanted to ask why your registration system is so complicated. The link that directs you to the magic school is not working. I had to spend 2 hours registering.
“Puylo” is a direct insult to the president of my country. /post/904959/ "Fucking Russia" is a direct insult to my homeland. /post/896729/ I would like to know why these users did not receive a ban for such and numerous statements that contradict the forum rules -
HeroesWorld prohibits the publication of prohibited, defamatory, malicious or infringing materials in accordance with applicable law.
HeroesWorld prohibits any direct or indirect insults to users, third parties or organizations.
All published materials and messages on HeroesWorld are the sole responsibility of the user who published them.
I accuse them of:
Trolling (from English trolling) – posting provocative messages online with the aim of causing flame, conflicts between participants, empty chatter, insults, etc.
Flame (from English flame) – an exchange of messages representing a verbal war that no longer relates to the original cause of the dispute. Flame messages usually contain personal insults and are often aimed at further fueling the quarrel. Sometimes used in the context of trolling, but more often flame flares up simply because of resentment towards a virtual interlocutor.
Insult (Invective vocabulary) – intentional or negligent humiliation of the honor and dignity of another person, expressed in an indecent form, i.e., a form contrasting with the norms accepted in the society in which the act is committed. An insult can be inflicted verbally, in writing, by action, publicly, both in the presence and absence of the victim. In an insult, no discrediting information about the victim is reported, but a negative assessment of his personality is given in a rude form.
Moreover, "Roger-ua" incites ethnic hatred, which is clearly visible from his posts. I request punishment.
Good afternoon.
I don't remember if I've expressed my opinion on the universally beloved topic of politics, or if I have at all, but I'll reiterate: in my opinion, if you start moderating this topic too strictly, its participants will still express their political views, only they will start doing it in other places on the forum and in other ways, so let them concentrate their efforts on one topic. I don't mind; my nerves can handle this topic, and there are very few random people in the general chat, unlike the "Heroes" sections; mostly, it's inhabited by long-time members who are used to everything. Besides, I'm not sure that there is a moderator in the world who can objectively punish all participants in the topic, both those with pro-Russian and pro-Ukrainian views, and if that happens, disputes about politics will be joined by disputes about the objectivity of moderating the topic, and the result will be even worse.
We will try to talk to the aforementioned individuals in a friendly manner; if they don't understand, we will have to take harsher measures.
Good day. I don't remember where I expressed my attitude towards everyone's favorite topic about politics, or whether I expressed it at all, but I'll repeat myself - in my opinion, if we start moderating this topic too harshly, its inhabitants will still express their political stance, only they'll start doing it in other parts of the forum and in different terms, so let them concentrate their efforts on one topic. I don't mind, my nerves can withstand this topic, and there are very few random people in the off-topic section, unlike in the "Heroic" sections; mostly old-timers who are used to everything hang out there. Besides, I'm not sure there exists a moderator in the world capable of objectively punishing all participants in the topic, both pro-Russian and pro-Ukrainian minded, and otherwise, arguments about the objectivity of moderating the topic will be added to the political arguments, and in the end it will turn out even worse. With the aforementioned individuals, we will try to talk nicely; if they don't understand, we'll have to resort to a harsher approach.
I just noticed the message. You are the moderator of this section and it's up to you to decide whether this topic is needed there or not. If you think the level of discussion in it is going overboard and nothing but a flame war is coming out of it - feel free to close it. Generally, I see 2 ways out of the current situation: 1. Ban discussion of politics at the level of HeroesWorld rules (I think it's not a problem at all) 2. Create a separate political section without censorship and leave it to be torn apart by "political scientists" and armchair analysts.
Dear Dyrman, could you please tell me where you saw an advertisement for EWA in this message? I carefully read the dialogue between serovoy and atlant108. serovoy repeatedly asked about the SkillWheel for Heroes V. Among all the participants in this thread, only atlant108 responded and helped him by posting a link. Where is the advertisement and violation here? Besides, the topic is called: SkillWheel for Heroes V atlant108 posted a link that is directly related to this topic, and this link is not related to advertising the EWA mod. Therefore, I agree with forum member atlant108. Dyrman, at the moment, you are indeed biased. You shouldn't be so quick to make harsh judgments without understanding the whole situation Furthermore, Dyrman, you write: Further discussion will be subject to rule 4.22 of the violation system... Well, what can I say? You are one of the forum moderators, and you have power within the forum, but you must agree that even a moderator should not abuse their power excessively - it's at least unfair. Yes, I've noticed that in almost every active topic, you delete certain messages, but don't you think that this is not quite right, because the meaning of the discussion is lost? And the last question, why do you allow yourself, for the first time, to infringe on the rights of other forum users without any reason? Do you even have a conscience?
I'll allow myself to respond on behalf of Dyrman: advertising does exist, but not in the message you are quoting. The message with advertising was deleted by Dyrman, and I confirm its existence (I can see it as a moderator). The message you are quoting is still there and has not been deleted, which means there are no complaints about it.
What’s so criminal about a little advertisement for this mod? After all, it’s not just another poorly made creation by some random guys in pajamas, but the result of a long-term effort by local forum members, veteran modders.
Just saw it))) If we strictly follow the forum rules, atlant108 would already have the required number of points for a ban. Lately, moderators have become much softer — even I only follow HeroesWorld rules about 5% of the time. Instead, I confess that I often overlooked mod advertising because I considered it useful for people, until finally it went too far. But since such favorable patronage is not acceptable, then you've convinced me that I am fully entitled to act according to the rules and assign points for each message.
In general, I see 2 ways out of this situation: 1. Ban the discussion of politics at the level of the forum rules (I don't think this is a problem).
I believe that this would be the right decision. The temptation to express oneself on political topics is great; I myself succumbed to it, but this topic creates too much discord among forum participants and has also become a means of propaganda for different views. On other forums where discussions of politics and interethnic conflicts are strictly prohibited, there is no such mess in the off-topic sections, and all nationalities communicate friendly and equally. And there are special websites for discussing politics.
I advise you to delete this topic, ban the discussion of politics and interethnic conflicts at the level of the forum rules, and use strict bans (temporary removal from the forum) for some time to cool down particularly unruly users.
Ment
kcfgogbfalgfl
