2016 Auto-translated

I suggest you take a look at this remarkable document (fresh off the press), especially those who see the European Union as an example of a "correct government," which is how it should be in our countries. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf I found it most ironic that approving a totalitarian ideology is a crime with aggravating circumstances, while in reality, the European Union itself is striving to become a totalitarian state, if it isn't one already. Today, we can see the following: a severe violation of the human right to freedom of speech, a violation of the people's right to self-determination, election rigging (although it would seem that, given the current level of brainwashing, this wouldn't even be necessary), the imposition of ideology, and so-called "brainwashing" from an early age and throughout a person's life, and in general, a fight against dissent. If anyone thinks that all of this is an exaggeration, I recommend that they think again.

But there's nothing surprising about that; it's quite obvious. To put it briefly, in terms of the structure of the political system, the CIS countries are only more advanced in that corruption, in the literal sense of the word, has taken a backseat. However, its main part has simply changed its name and become the foundation of modern European society. Even further – in America, for example, patriotic ideas are much stronger; you only need to familiarize yourself with their culture to see this, which then forms the basis of the state ideology. This also allows for changing presidents and holding generally fair elections because the main line of the country's policy still remains unchanged. In Europe, the methods are somewhat different, but also quite effective. In the CIS, it's a bit more complicated because the standard of living and the overall economic development of the local countries do not allow for exerting any financial pressure on the population (you can't fall any lower), which is why corruption (and the imposition of patriotism) takes on a more crude form; which, however, is still a very effective method of propaganda.
In general, these are all obvious things; I would even say facts that do not require any shocking proof: in modern society, only such methods can preserve at least some semblance of statehood. It is already quite clear that democracy as a political system has reached its limit and has become too closely intertwined with capitalism, and no new adequate ways for the development of political and economic structures have yet been invented, unfortunately.

Solution: National Socialism

Ha-ha, yeah right.

I was a Nazi in school. More precisely, it was like this: from 1st to 8th grade, I was a staunch capitalist, from 9th grade to my second year of university, I was a Nazi, and now I don't even know who I am anymore, probably a transhumanist.

The main difference between national socialism and all other ideologies, and primarily from communism, is that the interests of the state represent the interests of the nation, and not some faceless sovereign organization with its borders on the world map.

I was a Nazi in school.

national interests

please elaborate.

This doesn't require decoding; the interests of the nation equal the well-being of its people.

Solution: National Socialism

This doesn't require decoding; the interests of the nation equal the well-being of its people.

Of course, it does. Otherwise, it will be no better than a cover for the political elite to mess up their affairs, just like "patriotism." If you object to the actions of the authorities, you are not a patriot; you have betrayed the interests of the nation, you are an enemy of the people. And then you have to prove that the camel isn't you, but the authorities, whom the nation chose to represent its interests.
A simple example is war. How do you determine whether it is in the interests of the nation or in the interests of the elite?

Decoding "nation" would also be helpful. What does it mean in your understanding? The titular nation, citizenship, religious affiliation, or your own version?

Not a nation, but a race.

Not a race, but a species. Seriously, that would at least make some sense.

What kind? "Human"?

Yes. Which one is considered intelligent? Well, biologists consider it to be.

Here, scientists are doing the right thing – searching for intelligent life beyond Earth.