Skip to content

Posts from Forum

1.0 (1 rating)
In reply to Sanin
User Avatar
#6971
Auto-translated
Sanin
Why do you think you should be the one to decide this? Why should anyone care who you choose to focus on and what arguments are relevant to you personally?
Well, probably because I organize tournaments, create topics for them, and so on. Isn't that logical? :cool:
User Avatar
#6972
Auto-translated
I read the last 4 pages and still don't understand what prompted this question. As a player who enjoys playing both versions, I would find it much more convenient if tournaments featuring only the HotA version were in a separate HotA section. And in the HotA section, moderators could add a topic - "History of online HotA tournaments," where topics from old tournaments would be moved: Show Tournament, HotA Tasting, Mirrors. I think it's inconvenient when all tournaments are listed together.

UTC+03:00, icq 593626431
User Avatar
#6973
Auto-translated
Wow, there's a lot of unnecessary drama going on here. 1) The Hota team isn't asking Baratorch to artificially block any functionality for SoD. Everything that's exclusively made for Hota in HD is done based on his (or our shared, in the case of Okh) considerations; it's not up to you to tell him what to do. 2) Hasn't it occurred to anyone that it's often simply *easier* to write code directly for Hota than for SoD? If implementing something for Hota is faster for Baratorch, then of course he'll do it for her first. Then, if there's time/desire, he'll port it to SoD. There might not be time/desire for some technically complex things. 3) Baratorch is a member of the Hota team. If the team agrees to implement some functionality and Baratorch does it, then it might be more convenient for him to do it within the framework of his project (purely technically, in terms of where to write the code). Just consider that it appeared as part of Hota, not HD; what difference does it make which of our programmers implemented it? (especially since they always report it to us, not to the direct author...). Every functionality that's unavailable for SoD but available for Hota should be seen as additional, not as missing. Because it requires additional effort to implement it for SoD, not to block it there. And yes, once again: 4) Unless otherwise stated, Vic expresses his personal opinion, not the official position of the team.
User Avatar
#6974
Auto-translated
Hotatim once again demonstrated its cunning. Vik promotes Hotatim, while the rest of the team pretends to have nothing to do with it and essentially remains silent or makes neutral statements. It seems that Anton is right, and it's time to start a debate about excluding Hotatim tournaments from the general section.
Стримы HMM5 на полных картах мод TE:
ru.twitch.tv/noom11

Alex_nv - draw - Vovan112013 летос 236

alex_nv wrote: Наконец то нормальная игра с открытием половины карты.
#6975
Auto-translated
There is no conspiracy. Though it would be nice if there were one. Every team member sees the future of HotA in their own way. The HotA team consists of same Docent and Sav; the rest are a sub-team who often find out about new features along with everyone else during the next release.
HoMM 3 HD:

последняя версия - 5.0 RC96 (19.09.2020)

последнее видео: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u70wC0DJ7I8

полное подробное описание
In reply to nik312
User Avatar
#6976
Auto-translated
nik312
Wow, there's a lot of unnecessary negativity and pointless arguments going on here.

1) The Hota team isn't asking Baratorch to artificially block any functionality for SoD. Everything that's being exclusively developed for Hota in HD is based on his (or our collective, in the case of Okh) considerations; it's not up to you to tell him what to do.

2) Has it not occurred to anyone that it's often simply easier to write code directly for Hota in many cases, rather than for SoD? If implementing something for Hota is faster for Baratorch, then of course he'll do it for her first. Then, if there's time/desire, he'll port it to SoD. There may not be time/desire for some technically complex things.

3) Baratorch is a member of the Hota team. If the team agrees to implement some functionality and Baratorch is doing it, then it may be more convenient for him to do it within the framework of his project (purely technically, in terms of where to write the code). Just consider that it appeared as part of Hota, not HD; what difference does it make which of our programmers implemented it? (especially since we always report about Okh to us, not to the direct author...).

Every functionality that is not available for SoD but is available for Hota should be seen as additional, not as missing. Because it requires additional effort to implement it for SoD, not to block it there.

And yes, once again:
4) Unless otherwise specified, Vic expresses his personal opinion, not the official position of the team.
You're being told clearly: do what you want, move on from Hota 3, and everything will be fine.
In reply to Heroin_HP
User Avatar
#6977
Auto-translated
A couple of new castles (about 5) need to be added, then the fort should be made cheaper, and we could consider increasing the initial growth of level 1-6 creatures by 35% (because of this, heroes can be given only 2 stacks at the start), and then there won't be any whining about empty treasure zones; captured castles will actually start to be valued.

And it's long overdue to add some kind of bug to SoD.

Added after 7 minutes
Heroin_HP
They are telling you straight, just do whatever you want, move HotA away from the same-turn system and everything will be fine.
What's stopping you from creating a poll and finding out the people's opinion? You could even set conditions based on rating
672466033
Миха#7845
Ландау лев https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNj_9EQxDoI&t=1174s

Тут делимся книгами /topic/at/1139927/
In reply to Noom
User Avatar
#6978
Auto-translated
Noom
Hotatim once again demonstrated his cunning. Vik promotes Hotatems, while the rest of the team pretends to have nothing to do with it and essentially remains silent/makes neutral statements. It feels like Anton is right, and it's time to start a war to exclude tournaments on Hotatems from the general section.

Oh yes, a masterful conspiracy is evident. How cleverly it's all planned. Surely, it couldn't be that Vik is promoting Hotatems based on his own vision, while the others are not interested/lack experience in this/are tired of the arguments.
User Avatar
#6979
Auto-translated
=Lizard=
People who have never and will never cheat in any version of the game and are willing to play any version, even any, at the top level if necessary.
You already showed a top level recently :D
User Avatar
#6981
Auto-translated
There is such a psychological trait as egocentrism.
Wikipedia
Egocentrism (from Ancient Greek Εγώ — "I" and Latin centrum — "center of the circle") is an individual's inability or unwillingness to consider any point of view other than their own as worthy of attention. The perception of one's own point of view as the only existing one. The term was introduced into psychology by Jean Piaget to describe characteristics of thinking typical for children up to 8-10 years old.[1] For various reasons, such a characteristic of thinking may persist in varying degrees even at a more mature age.
This discussion illustrates this effect in full. For some reason, a group of comrades decided that the online three-player game on HeroesWorld belongs personally to them, that one can only play here what they play, that all dissenters should get out and go elsewhere, etc.

Also, for some reason, they hold the belief that the entire volume of work involved in organizing "heroic life," improving software and rules, refining regulations, etc., is done specifically for them. Apparently, just because they have pretty eyes.

The idea that rights and obligations in this life tend toward a balance with each other—that you can only take from the same amount as you previously put in—is slow to reach their consciousness.

Although in reality, that is exactly how it is.

Dirty wrote quite correctly:
Dirty_Player
I think that for creating the HD mod, Baratorchu can now be written about however one wants and wherever one wants!
User Avatar
#6982
Auto-translated
I, for one, clearly understand what will happen if we create a poll and filter out votes from users who registered less than a year ago. p.s. A great forum warrior with a messiah complex is telling others about their egocentrism – what a joke.
User Avatar
#6984
Auto-translated
A huge, tedious argument, I wasted my time on you for nothing.
Не бійся коли ти один, бійся коли ти нуль.

484800548

In reply to skd
User Avatar
#6985
Auto-translated
skd
I read the last four pages and still don't understand what prompted this question.

As a player who enjoys playing both versions, I would find it much more convenient if the Tournaments featuring only the HotA version were in a separate HotA section.

And in the HotA section, moderators could add a topic – "History of Online HotA Tournaments," where topics from old tournaments would be moved: Show Tournament, HotA Tasting, Mirrors.

In my opinion, it's inconvenient when all tournaments are mixed together in the list.
The placement of HotA tournaments in this case is just a pretext, not the reason. It's clear that it can be done either way, and the difference isn't that significant.

The reason for the argument on my side is that I don't believe my opponents are authorized to tell me where and what to organize. Especially in a rude manner, with harsh rhetoric and banging their fists on the table. They have no such right, neither legally nor morally.

And the reason for the argument on the opponents' side is that they are upset about the competition between the versions. And although I explained as best as I could that there isn't much competition here, and that both versions can coexist peacefully, they apparently didn't believe it. Well, what can you do, it happens, I did what I could on my side...
In reply to Wicc
User Avatar
#6986
Auto-translated
Wicc
The location of the HotU tournaments in this case is just a pretext, not the reason. It's clear that it can be done either way, and the difference isn't too significant.

The reason for the dispute on my side is that I don't think the opponents are authorized to tell me where and what to hold. Especially in a rude manner, with harsh rhetoric and banging their fists on the table. They don't have that right, neither legally nor morally.

And the reason for the dispute on the opponents' side is that they are upset about the competition between versions. And although I explained as best as I could that there isn't much competition here, that both versions can coexist peacefully, they apparently didn't believe it. Well, what can you do, it happens, I did what I could...
What made you think you could take tournaments that used to be on Soda and hold them in HotU?