Posts from Brief. Auto-translated

2016.

The style itself is decent, generally speaking. However, I understand why fans might be unhappy, considering how different the new Civilization's style is from the previous ones.

Это Clash of Clans?

The overall graphical style is reminiscent of Civilization Revolution, a game developed exclusively for consoles and mobile phones – isn't this a step backward?

I've spent a lot of time playing the third installment, a little in the fourth, and some in the fifth. In the latter, I liked the gameplay significantly less, but I was satisfied with the visual aspects of the game.

The first thing that struck me when I saw this screenshot:
- The colors are too saturated, which, combined with the overall cartoonish style, looks very tasteless and evokes associations with cheap projects like various browser games.
- The fields look as if they were drawn in Paint in a couple of minutes.
- There are no forests – it's just individual trees, it looks more like a park.
- The textures are boring/empty.

Let's take, for example, a screenshot from the fifth installment

This is what a forest looks like, this is what fields look like, and this is what textures look like.

Looking at other screenshots of the sixth installment, one cannot help but notice the huge weapons in the hands of the units, which, for me personally, is also an example of bad taste.

If the gameplay doesn't change significantly, then it's fine. I didn't play the fifth installment either, only the previous ones.

If the gameplay doesn't change significantly

I haven't played the fifth one

The gameplay has already undergone significant changes with the release of the fifth installment, and the developers, in turn, stated that the sixth game is based on the fifth.

So, fans of the fifth game shouldn't worry too much. And I still enjoy playing the first one, even though the third one is considered the best.

I quickly created a new game in five minutes. Graphically, it might look a little… unusual, but don’t worry; the gameplay hasn’t suffered.

I agree that the fifth one looks better than the sixth, but I also like the sixth. The main thing is that it shouldn't consume too many resources and should be informative enough; after all, it's Civilization. The quality of the graphics in this game is secondary. Although, if with such graphics it requires as much as the third Witcher (or whatever is the current benchmark for video card resource consumption)... then that would be an undeniable failure.

I quickly put together a new game in five minutes. Graphically, it might look a little... unusual, but don't worry, the gameplay hasn't suffered.

I'd play it.

$49.99 from you.

Finish the game first. I don't buy early access.

I would play it.

And I wouldn't. There are some unarmed little guys fighting giants, Poseidon is sitting in the water, and there's also a wooden tank. It's clearly some kind of mess and imbalance.

The most important thing is the netcode, and everything else comes second.

The most important thing is the soul, and appearance comes second.