Skip to content

Posts from Your favorite and least favorite monsters in Heroes.

1.8 (5 ratings)
User Avatar
#77
Auto-translated
In the third... uh... I forgot everything, it's been a while since I played... But I think the dragons were pretty good...
In the fourth... well, even though many people criticized it, I liked it... the monks were cool... and of course, there were phoenixes. Archangels were awesome. Genies were decent. VAMPIRES! I love them. The only ones I didn't like were peasants, minotaurs, and mages. Yuck.

And in the fifth, everything is cool! Even the demons are pretty good!
In reply to celt
User Avatar
#78
Auto-translated
celt
not a bad list! I didn't mention Azure and others because they aren't very good, as they are extremely expensive!
I mentioned them because they look very beautiful. celt
User Avatar
#79
Auto-translated
Minotaurs are pretty good in Heroes 4, but Medusas are even better! And mages are just cannon fodder!
In reply to MsDevil
User Avatar
#80
Auto-translated
MsDevil
In the third one... well, I forgot everything, it's been a while since I played... But I think the dragons were pretty good...
In the fourth one... well, even though many people criticized it, I liked it... the monks were cool... and of course, the phoenixes. The archangels were awesome. The genies were okay. VAMPIRES! I love them. The only ones I didn't like were the peasants, minotaurs, and mages. Yuck.

And in the fifth one, everything is cool! Even the demons are not bad.
Yes, the monks are really cool because when you kill them, it seems like they threw up. And if you don't remember who was in the third one, check my list, maybe it will help you remember
User Avatar
#81
Auto-translated
I evaluate monsters based on their combat abilities and cost-effectiveness! Their appearance is not the most important factor!
In reply to celt
User Avatar
#82
Auto-translated
celt
Minotaurs are good in Heroes 4, but Medusas are even better! And mages are just cannon fodder!
Minotaurs are very slow, but you're right, they are quite good; they block attacks well.
User Avatar
#83
Auto-translated
They aren't that slow. But the Haven mages, Hobbits, Dwarves, and Nagas – those are the real bottlenecks!
In reply to celt
User Avatar
#84
Auto-translated
celt
they're not that slow. Haven's knights, hobbits, dwarves, and nagas – those are the real slowpokes!
Listen, let me explain why I currently value the aesthetics of creatures more than their combat abilities.
User Avatar
#85
Auto-translated
I understand why... after all, the peasants in Heroes of Might and Magic III have the best design.
In reply to celt
User Avatar
#86
Auto-translated
celt
I understand why... after all, the peasants in Heroes of Might and Magic III are the most beautiful.
No, you misunderstood.
User Avatar
#87
Auto-translated
I don't mind beauty, but I'm all for functionality! That's why peasants are useless!
Скоро! Всем ждать! Они явятся!:smile20:
In reply to celt
User Avatar
#88
Auto-translated
celt
an angel-like, sexless, and bodiless creature... but here's a woman! HORROR!
Well, angels can be considered sexless, but they take on a male form. An example of this are the archangels: Michael, Gabriel.
Sorry if I posted in the wrong topic. Thank you in advance.
User Avatar
#89
Auto-translated
but she's a woman... I love Archangels.
Скоро! Всем ждать! Они явятся!:smile20:
In reply to celt
User Avatar
#90
Auto-translated
celt
but it's a woman... I love archangels
I apologize if you can't express yourself differently, but please don't write "woman," just "female" or something else, because it's not nice to use such words! We're talking about something great here, about Heroes 5!! And there's no need for such words!

Archangels are indeed sexless and bodiless beings...
So what if in Heroes, they are female? Does that make archangels ugly????
С уважением, Vlad

HeroesWorld: В контакте
http://vk.com/heroesworld
User Avatar
#91
Auto-translated
Noted! I agree, Archangel is better than Spirit Dragons!
Скоро! Всем ждать! Они явятся!:smile20: