Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Well, those who registered right before the game started. You didn't. I'm voting for NNV because Arandor said so. The cop is still suspicious. He didn't join our chat, he threw suspicion on me, and he seems to want to get rid of me for some reason. And Yashur is a maniac; he doesn't care who he hangs, especially since he's complaining about too many negatives, which means it's more profitable for him to look for mafia members like Jaconda first. That's the situation.
Well, those who registered right before the game started. You didn't. I'm voting for No Night Vote because Arandor said so. The Sheriff is still suspicious. He didn't join our chat, he threw evidence at me, and he seems to want to get rid of me for some reason. And Yashur is a maniac; he doesn't care who he hangs, and he's even complaining that there are too many negatives, which means it's more profitable for him to look for Mafia members first, like Jaconda. So, that's the situation.
So, let's execute him and be done with it.
Also, keep in mind that there are many negatives, which means No Night Vote is only beneficial to the negatives because it gives them a chance to vote and generally reduces their chances of being exposed. A No Night Vote allows them not to strain themselves, thus they won't be exposed in the discussion and will protect themselves from execution. And if we execute someone and guess a negative, their partners will likely be exposed as well, which is naturally not beneficial to the negatives.
Therefore, it's better to use the execution rather than waste it on a No Night Vote.
Added 2 minutes ago Uranium235
So, you won't hang Heroist because, essentially, there's only evidence against him, and it's questionable?
The evidence isn't an argument for me. Especially since I know that any evidence can be fabricated against anyone.
And besides that, I don't see any other arguments against him.
But I can note that his reaction was to suggest a No Night Vote, which is illogical for a negative because, in this case, his defense mechanism should have kicked in, and he should have tried to find anyone but himself, rather than wasting a vote.
Of course, execution is better than wasting a day on NNV. But if there's no discussion, how will we identify our allies? And it seems some people aren't aware of the game's start. If we're going to execute someone just for the sake of it, wouldn't it be more logical to execute those who won't give up any information anyway?
any piece of evidence can be twisted to implicate anyone
I'd like you to confirm. I want you to twist the evidence to implicate yourself, and it should sound plausible (from the perspective of at least a few of the players present).
Of course, execution is better than wasting a day on NNV. But if there is no discussion, how will we figure out who our teammates are? And it seems that someone is not aware of the game's start. If we are going to execute someone just to execute them, wouldn't it be more logical to execute those who are not going to provide any information anyway?
Based on the reaction to the votes for a teammate and attempts to defend him or transfer him to another team. Because I don't think anyone would just decide to give up a teammate.
If he is not aware of the game, it's a pity, and the argument is a bit dirty, but the conclusion is obvious: if he had a team, they would have kicked him out of the game sooner. :confused:
Added 4 minutes later Ment
I would like you to confirm. I want you to frame yourself and make it look plausible (from the point of view of at least a few of the players present).
I'm too lazy. Moreover, I'll say more, I didn't even read the clues myself. Just the results, I'm used to playing without them.
But at the same time, I know that we have framed people without any problems before.
It's not always possible to connect everything without issues, and not every clue can be linked to any suspect; you understand that, right? Maybe this isn't the case right now. Throughout today's gameplay, I only saw two plausible connections: mine and the one with the rose. So... I'm going to remain skeptical.
They've successfully framed someone multiple times before, which doesn't equal the ability to frame anyone with any evidence. You understand that, right? Maybe this isn't one of those cases. In today's gameplay, I only saw two plausible connections: mine and the one with the rose. So... I'm going to remain skeptical.
I didn't say anyone. But generally, it applies to many, just like false meanings are sometimes found. In short, it just creates confusion because all the attention shifts to the evidence, not to the players.