No, of course not. But he believes that the surface of the Earth is a one-connected, closed, compact, two-dimensional manifold without an edge, homeomorphic to a two-dimensional sphere. :D:D:D
Posts from Academy of Sciences of Heroesland
Auto-translated
Should I accept the White Guard’s offer?
No, of course not. But he believes that the surface of the Earth is a one-connected closed compact two-dimensional manifold without an edge, homeomorphic to a two-dimensional sphere.:D:D:D
Небо – угроз не слышит
Небо – ведёт особый счёт
Небо – тебя найдёт
I would call it a three-dimensional sphere after all.
Added 2 minutes ago
on this very sphere we have 2D, but without 3D such a sphere simply cannot exist...
Added 3 minutes ago
Zlobny YashchurNo, of course not. But he believes that the surface of the Earth represents a one-connected closed compact two-dimensional manifold without edges, homeomorphic to a two-dimensional sphere. :D:D:D
Added 1 minute ago
So this is what I live on! :eek:
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).
No, a three-dimensional sphere is our Universe. More precisely, I heard somewhere that the Universe is a three-dimensional sphere.
This, by the way, is not necessarily true. It is one of two versions derived from General Relativity. The second is that the Universe is an open, infinite space, described by three dimensions (that is, exactly how we see it with our ordinary perspective).
However, an ordinary sphere is a manifold of dimension 2, not 3.
Did you think it would be something else?:D
🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
geoid.
Небо – угроз не слышит
Небо – ведёт особый счёт
Небо – тебя найдёт
The second universe is an open, infinite space described by three dimensions (that is, exactly how we see it with our ordinary perspective).
Well, yes, but I don't like that terminology. Obviously, it is impossible to ensure closure in two dimensions. Here, it is more important how such a manifold looks to the observer, and not how it looks to the objects inside itself, in my humble opinion. Although I don't argue about the dimension of the manifold; the terminology is accurate there, but with the dimension of the figure – yes)).
A geometric locus of points in space equidistant from a given point.
But the Earth is not round, not spherical, and not even ball-shaped; it is a geoid.
Added 2 minutes ago
Georoid.
Goreit
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).
Небо – угроз не слышит
Небо – ведёт особый счёт
Небо – тебя найдёт
🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
The first explains expansion (if you take a camera from a ball, draw something on it, and start inflating it, the drawn object will begin to increase, and it will increase equally in all directions, and the larger it is, the faster it increases). All that remains is to figure out who that guy with the pump is... And how can we explain expansion using the second one?
What do you think about this?
Obviously, for the three-dimensional case, we have a sphere in 3D, not in 4D space.
But a geoid, by definition, has the shape of the Earth, right?