Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
In general, this wouldn't even be a full-fledged murder, but rather a vigilante act.
:) Vigilante justice is when you introduce an ancient (not even medieval) "stoning," which no reasonably adequate society would accept. And if you don't introduce it, then it's a crime (both morally and legally).
Not for any reason, but in the case of infidelity.
=for any reason
Besides, if you really want to settle everything this way, you don't even need to go to court.
They'll enter a "state of affect" and file a lawsuit. And then they'll cry for the rest of their lives.
After learning about the infidelity, it's easy to enter a state of affect, when self-control is no better than that of a drunkard. But in this case, there is no guilt on the part of the person who entered such a state, but the drunkard is to blame himself, he needs to know his limits.
If you judge it that way, then most murders are committed in a state of affect, one way or another. "I had no money, everyone cheated and ruined me, I fell into depression and robbed," "He looked at me sideways, I got scared, my natural self-defense mechanisms kicked in and I killed" and so on. Raskolnikov was also in a state of affect when he killed the old woman's relative. And he didn't just kill the old woman for no reason, but under the influence of external circumstances, poverty, high interest rates, etc. So, he wasn't to blame then, right? If the old woman had given a lower interest rate, he wouldn't have killed her, right? That's how we end up with an absurdity...
Alex, I still recommend India to you. If I understand correctly, it aligns with your views in some way.
Currently, for example, India is considering a number of amendments to laws that could protect women from their husbands' infidelity. Rumor has it that it involves relatively short prison sentences. Some skeptics are already saying that the punishment for husbands is not strict enough – a man will receive only a few years in prison for effectively ruining his wife's honor.
..разым двазым трызым рызым пята лата сигерь мата локом боком крюк за крюк из бульмы бульма урюк.. Знание некоторых закономерностей освобождает от изучения многих фактов. Мечты сбываются рано или поздно, так или иначе.
Currently, for example, India is considering a number of amendments to laws that could protect women from their husbands' infidelity. Rumor has it that, for now, it involves relatively short prison sentences. Some skeptics are already saying that the punishment for husbands is not strict enough – a man will receive only a few years in prison for effectively ruining his wife's honor.
You don't understand, Sesame. Only women should be punished for infidelity...men don't cheat...
Added 1 minute ago
No. This contradicts my beliefs and religion.
But does shooting people contradict your religion?
Небо – мольбы не ждёт Небо – угроз не слышит Небо – ведёт особый счёт Небо – тебя найдёт
They will enter a "state of affect" and submit. And then they will cry for the rest of their lives.
I don't think anyone will be crying.
If we judge by that, then most murders are committed in a state of affect, one way or another. "I had no money, everyone cheated and ruined me, I fell into depression and robbed," "He looked at me sideways, I got scared, my natural self-defense mechanisms kicked in, and I killed him," and so on. Raskolnikov was also in a state of affect when he killed the old woman's relative. And he didn't just kill the old woman for no reason; he did it under the influence of external circumstances, poverty, high interest rates, and so on. So, he wasn't to blame, right? If the old woman had given him a loan at a lower interest rate, he wouldn't have killed her, right? That's how we end up with an absurdity...
Well, you're exaggerating here. What a comparison.
Currently, for example, in India, a number of amendments to the laws are being considered that could protect women from their husbands' infidelity. Rumor has it that, for now, it involves relatively short prison sentences. Some skeptics are already saying that the punishment for husbands is not strict enough – a man will receive only a few years in prison for effectively ruining his wife's honor.
But what about unfaithful wives?
E si sui vius, er mi grans benananza, e si ieu muoir, er mi grans deliuriers
Well, you're exaggerating here. What a comparison.
Not at all. Any stress is that very notorious "state of affect." Only the degree of such a state can vary. But it also depends on the sensitivity of the individual, right? And if you add to this
But in that case, there is no guilt on the part of the person who has entered such a state.
then there doesn't even need to be stress; any social injustice, any external factor = there is no guilt on the part of the person who has entered such a state.
Ment
Ple-Sen
