Auto-translated
I might have missed a couple of commas, but you clearly didn't understand what I was trying to say, and I don't feel like explaining it further.
HellLighT
Posts from Action timer in combat.
HellLighT
Noom
Auto-translated
Okay, maybe I missed a couple of commas, but you definitely didn't understand what I was trying to say, and I don't feel like explaining it further.
Dirty, thank you for letting this argument linger in the thread for so long without moderation!
Стримы HMM5 на полных картах мод TE:
ru.twitch.tv/noom11
Alex_nv - draw - Vovan112013 летос 236
alex_nv wrote: Наконец то нормальная игра с открытием половины карты.
ru.twitch.tv/noom11
Alex_nv - draw - Vovan112013 летос 236
alex_nv wrote: Наконец то нормальная игра с открытием половины карты.
Vatya
Auto-translated
Maybe I'm missing something... The average game time is about 5-6 hours, and situations with long battles in the Fortress Battle occur at most once every 10 games (although I personally have only encountered it a couple of times). The time saved by introducing this feature is approximately half an hour. As a result, we have an implementation of some idea for the sake of saving half an hour out of 50-60 hours. Does it make sense? I understand some Starcraft players who are used to clicking quickly and have 200-300 people cursing on their stream, but are there really that many people who deliberately waste time in the Fortress Battle?
Ася 390383586
Осень-Зима 2013-14.
Осень-Зима 2013-14.
=Lizard=
Auto-translated
No. The main benefit isn't saving 30 minutes (although that's a plus too), but rather improving the skill level during battles. Most players have learned how to reposition their units, but only a few can actually fight effectively (and I'm not one of them, by the way). That's why ATG will always remain one of the strongest players in history, because no one has reached that level of micro-management since. And he did it (and still does) very quickly, and that's what inspires respect. To come up with a simple action after 25 minutes (and in the process, lull and maximally annoy the opponent) is not at all cool.
p.s. 2Vatya: if you don't understand something, why are you writing? And using words like "shnyaga."
p.s. 2Vatya: if you don't understand something, why are you writing? And using words like "shnyaga."
Auto-translated
Wouldn't it be simpler to just set a time limit for each battle, like 20 minutes per player? Whoever runs out of time loses. That way, people wouldn't drag out the battles.
Heroin_HP
Auto-translated
Wouldn't it be simpler to just give each player a set amount of time for the battle, like 20 minutes, and whoever runs out of time loses? That way, people wouldn't drag it out.
Added 8 minutes later
No. The main benefit is not saving 30 minutes (although that's a plus too), but rather improving the quality of battles. Most people have learned how to move units around, but very few can actually fight effectively (and I'm not one of them, by the way). That's why ATG will always be one of the strongest players in history, because no one has reached that level of micro-management since. And he did it (and still does) very quickly, and that's what makes it so impressive. To come up with a simple solution after 25 minutes (and in the process, lull the opponent into a false sense of security and maximize their frustration) is not impressive at all.
=Stinger=
Auto-translated
Actually, this is exactly why AT&G will forever remain one of the strongest players in history, because no one has reached that level of micromanagement since then. And he did it (and still does) very quickly, and it's this that commands respect. To come up with a simple action after 25 minutes (and in the process lull and maximally annoy the opponent) is not cool at all.
You're probably either joking or simply haven't noticed that during Fast Battles, AT&G likes to take a half-hour or hour break to think, and in Fast Battles, he's quite slow.:)
KobRa_RR
Auto-translated
You're either joking or simply haven't noticed that during a Facebook AT game, a player likes to take a half-hour to an hour break to think, and it's during Facebook that he's particularly slow. :)
And at the same time, simulate the situation on another computer...))
=Lizard=
Auto-translated
And at the same time, simulate the situation on another computer...))
And during the game, KobRa should also join the "tea party" mentioned by Stinger.
BA/IEHOK
Auto-translated
And along the way, Cobra should also try that tea mentioned by Stinger. :)
And he must definitely fall asleep in front of Alik's computer; otherwise, the picture will be incomplete.
693078206
HellLighT
Auto-translated
and in online competitions, he continues to consistently perform poorly from tournament to tournament.
=Lizard=
Auto-translated
The audience is asking if the magnificent The would like to have a series on , to prove his words?
Better to have it at CIS-16 - a bet on arm wrestling. I haven't seen The, but something tells me to bet on Anton :).
Lider1
Auto-translated
Better to bet on him in the CIS-16 arm wrestling match. I haven't seen The, but something tells me to bet on Anton :).
Arm wrestling is a deceptive sport. You can look healthy, big, and strong. But still lose :D To someone who looks like a weakling :D Because of a) simply not knowing basic technique, b) having underdeveloped specific muscle groups: weak wrists, forearms, ligaments.
And there will be a big guy who can lift 200 kg, but doesn't know how to arm wrestle - like a kitten.
So, who knows, appearances can be deceiving here) :D
Сейчас балуюсь этим https://vcmi.eu/download/
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
=Lizard=
Auto-translated
Anton is doing fine with the technical aspects; the problem lies elsewhere.
Auto-translated
Viewers are asking if the magnificent The would like to play a series with stakes, to prove his words?
Statistics
Welcome our newest member:
Emil