Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Fortress, what do you think about the cost of building it?Auto-translated
You just can't prove that it's nonsense, and you can't deny that there's a lot of nonsense in the Sode [SoD] either, so that's why you're feeling sick. I hope one day there will be normal Heroes.
I'm sure I won't be able to prove anything to you with words, so I suggest we play for money BO3 [Best of 3] any 3 templates of your choice (within reason). I'll play without cons [console?] and Dragon Fly Hives, since I'm sure you also consider Necromancy imbalanced, so without it too. You play however you want, within the rules. For each template, I'll pick Castle, and I'll play as 3 different Castles. You can also pick any Castle that differs from mine.
I'm sure I won't prove anything to you with words, so I suggest we play a BO3 for money on any 3 templates of your choice (within reason). I'll play without conflux and dragon fly hives, since I'm sure you also consider necromancy imbalanced — so I'll play without that as well. You play however you want, within the rules. For each template, I pick Castle and will play with 3 different Castles. You can also pick any Castle different from mine.
Oh, I love handicaps, can I have one like that?:smile03:
Thank you all, I've drawn conclusions about most people.
You're just approaching the matter incorrectly. First, you need to discuss all the polls in private messages with the Big Three - Pit, Dirty, Romantic. If they approve your idea and give the party the go-ahead to vote, then you can create it, and everything will go smoothly. Otherwise, everyone will make fun of you. Things don't work that way here; it's a quid pro quo.
Thank you to everyone; I've drawn conclusions about most people.
Maybe it's worth drawing some conclusions about yourself? If so many people are explaining to you, for the umpteenth time, that you are wrong and why, maybe you should think about it?
P.S. Could you tell me if the word "сдешевить" actually exists in the Ukrainian language?
I think it's a slightly slangy expression, but definitely not in Ukrainian. At best, it's in Surzhyk (a mixture of Russian and Ukrainian). If it's spelled with "Z" instead of "S," then it could be Ukrainian.
Maybe it's worth drawing some conclusions about yourself? If so many people are explaining to you for the umpteenth time that you are wrong and why, maybe you should think about it?
You are all wrong; no one wants to develop the game or create a theory that can be used to evaluate it. No one wants to, and the old-timers don't even think about it, but there are plenty of shortcomings. And you still haven't explained anything to me.
You are all wrong; no one wants to develop the game or create a theory to evaluate it. No one wants to, and the old-timers don't even think about it, even though there are plenty of shortcomings. And you still haven't explained anything to me properly.
Judging the game is not the same as developing it. But the game is being developed. An example of this is the influx of new players from streams, Hota, HV rules, HD mod, and so on. And balancing the game by adjusting costs, growth rates, and other numerical changes will not change the fact that people will continue to complain about the matchups. For judging, I heard they made a mirror match. If you understand all this, you can conclude that the topic was created to attract attention. DaU
You just can't prove that it's nonsense.
Nonsense doesn't exist; there are ideas that are suitable and those that are not. Your idea is not suitable for the community. It's especially surprising that you came up with it, and others should do it. Do it, and we'll try it.
the thread was created to attract attention to myself
I created the thread about HotA because I saw the friction, wanted to know opinions, but emptiness...
You don't like how I write with mistakes — I'll write in Ukrainian:
The thread about the Fort was created to add additional variety to the game; even in the M200 balance there is a Necro (Conflux) Castle with a Fort, and nothing bad has come of it.
And a 50% growth increase (for creatures 1-6) would only give the effect of a Citadel, a Citadel the effect of a Castle, and a Castle is rarely built first (+2 creatures of level 6), so with a Castle we would have a total growth for level 6 creatures of 3 in the Fort, 4 Citadel, 6 Castle; only 2 more level 6 creatures than the usual. That's why I said it would slightly ease the dependence on Conservatories and Hives.
And together with the Fort, this would add an additional, minor strategic component.
And for those who like to nitpick words: сделать дешевле - сдешевить, it's just how I phrased it.
I'd also rework Diplomacy, I'd even agree on creatures of levels 1 and 2 it breaks classic Heroes (no army built in the Castle), but there should be an achievement for it as an antithesis to Necromancy, so how to rework it???
But you only know how to go off-topic.
As for HotA, what I gather, as it seemed to me: "I haven't played HotA and won't", "I played HotA, but daddy's choking — I'll lose", "I played WT, the rest is crap".