Skip to content

Posts from HOMM3 Ratings and Stats

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
In reply to skd
User Avatar
11 years ago
Auto-translated
skd
And secondly, the permanent ranking should take into account players starting from a minimum number of games – for example, 40 games. Because the ranking is full of players with only one game, like Tazar_tryaset_Uiliki. This issue needs to be adjusted.
If you filter out inactive players after a year, 40 will be too many; there will be about 50-70 players left. 20 would be just right.
User Avatar
11 years ago
Auto-translated
Where is the statistics for templates and castles? It was better before. (s)

I agree with those who suggest reducing the number of games required to be included in the ranking, but also filtering out those who haven't been active for the last year or so. Otherwise, great job, thank you.
In reply to Lider1
11 years ago
Auto-translated
Lider1
If a year passes since the player's last game, they should be removed from the permanent ranking.
If they play even one game, they should be reinstated.

Just an idea.
Taken from boxrec.com/index.php

Once-top players will be forgotten. The same applies to players with 40+ games.
In reply to =Logistik=
User Avatar
11 years ago
Auto-translated
=Logistik=
Once-top-tier nicknames will be forgotten. The same applies to 40+ games.
A separate table could be created for once-top-tier nicknames, like a "we remember and honor" section :)))) Although the key word is "once" :)

And also... Separate links are needed for each season, not just the current one.
In reply to =Logistik=
User Avatar
11 years ago
Auto-translated
=Logistik=
Top nicknames of the past will be forgotten. The same applies to players who have played 40+ games.
It would be possible to make it so that by default, only those who have played within the last year are shown, and add an additional button for all time, including inactive players. There is no point in showing "dead" nicknames, as it is already history. And if someone decides to return from this history and play at least one game, their achievements will not disappear. They will appear in the current ranking.

// (And how are the rights of the "top" players better than those who haven't had time to play 40 games? If it's everyone, then show everyone.)


Otherwise, Nitro has done a great job, and I thank you for that.
11 years ago
Auto-translated
and those who don't regularly stir things up on the forum should also be removed.
11 years ago
Auto-translated
I knew that it wouldn't be limited to just one table in Word
User Avatar
11 years ago
Auto-translated
Thanks to wowa, the service is starting to take on a more human form.

Added 2 minutes ago
Satir
Where is the statistics for templates and Castles? It was better before) (c)
I need help with an important task so that statistics on Castles/templates can be created. So far, only Sanin and Rebellious have agreed. We need 5-6 people; then each person will have about 3-4 hours of work. Don't hesitate – write to me in ICQ if you want statistics :))
Satir

I agree with those who suggest making fewer games required to get into the ranking but filtering out those who haven’t been active for the last year or two. Otherwise, great job, thank you.
It will be implemented as an option.

Added 2 minutes ago
Vatya

And also... Separate links are needed for each season, not just for the current one.
It is planned, but you should understand that the data will not match the official data by 100%, because my script simply counts reports within a given date range, while Pete moves some reports from one season to another in his rating.
Yesterday, Vova and I stayed up until half past three, but now the report viewing page looks like this:
Attachments 1
1 file attached • Total size: 339.5 KB
User Avatar
11 years ago
Auto-translated
Yesterday, I was in the leaderboard. I played 45 games. Today, I'm not in the leaderboard, even though I meet the requirement of 40+ games.
In reply to Nitro
User Avatar
11 years ago
Auto-translated
Nitro
Thanks to wowa, the service is starting to take on a more human form.

Added 2 minutes ago

I need help with one important task so that statistics for Castles/templates can be created. So far, only Sanin and Rebellious have agreed. We need 5-6 people; then each person will have about 3-4 hours of work. Don't hesitate – write to me in ICQ if you want statistics :))
It will be implemented as an option.

Added 2 minutes ago

There are plans for this, but you should understand that the data will not match the official ones by 100%, because my script simply counts reports within a given date range, while Pete moves some reports from one season to another in his rating.
Yesterday, Vova and I were up until half past three, but now the report viewing page looks like this:
I recommend changing the background from black to something else. The blue color is very difficult to see
In reply to Heroes13
User Avatar
11 years ago
Auto-translated
Heroes13
Yesterday I was in the table. 45 games played. Today I'm not in the table, although I meet the 40+ games limit.
Thank you, I fixed it. There was a problem with those who made renames. I also lowered the threshold for entering the permanent ranking to 20 games.

Added 32 seconds ago
Blitz
I recommend changing the background from black to something else. The blue color is very hard to see.
I agree.
User Avatar
11 years ago
Auto-translated
))) Dubrovin Pavel: 413 games, 256 wins, 91st place (!) ))) hilarious
In reply to =Lizard=
User Avatar
11 years ago
Auto-translated
=Lizard=
))) Dubrovin Pavel: 413 games, 256 wins, 91st place (!) ))) hilarious
/topic/at/818474/
Pit for LM
83. Dubrovin Pavel (256, 152, 413) 1577
Pit has the same thing, only he is in 83rd place because there is a limit of 40 games.
In reply to =Lizard=
User Avatar
11 years ago
Auto-translated
=Lizard=
))) Dubrovin Pavel: 413 games, 256 wins, 91st place (!) ))) hilarious
I think he has already broken this record on the War of the Throne.
User Avatar
11 years ago
Auto-translated
Nitro
Please note that this rating is not official and is likely not entirely accurate, as some reports from the previous season are carried over to the current one (!!!), and the system only considers reports from a strictly defined time frame. However, in my opinion, the rating can be used as a guideline.
Why can't the program identify a report not by the date it was written/confirmed, but by the date mentioned in the report itself? Then everything would be correct regarding the seasonal aspect.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: recijeb