Skip to content

Posts from Seasonal ranking. Auto-translated

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Closed
Is a rating needed for ХВ?
36 voters
Single choice Public votes Closed 2015-06-16
This poll is closed.
Definitely!
75% 27 votes
I don't understand what we're talking about!
25% 9 votes
In reply to Iamsamstan
User Avatar
#31
Auto-translated
Iamsamstan
lately, all anyone does here is propose polls on improving the game, while trashing those who keep the forum going. Pete doesn't have time to calculate ratings anymore, no one else can do the math, and if Kostya or angry Roma also give up on the forum, there won't even be anyone to run a tournament, and HeroesWorld will suffer the same fate as HeroesPortal. So, less drama and personal opinions, and more positivity.)
no need to make things up, according to Kostya, there are plenty of people who want to take this on, you just need to hand over the reins

лето 2012.
User Avatar
#32
Auto-translated
Besides Leader and Dark, I don't see anyone else interested in this topic.


In reply to KobRa_RR
#33
Auto-translated
KobRa_RR
Besides Leader and Dark, I don't see anyone else who would be interested in this topic.
We've already figured out that the results will be available soon.
Nitro
Guys, my automatic ranking will be ready by June 1st (if Pete approves). Maybe Pete is waiting for my ranking, so he's not wasting time on calculating it.
User Avatar
#34
Auto-translated
added a poll

лето 2012.
In reply to Dark
User Avatar
#35
Auto-translated
Poll results: Is a rating needed on HeroesWorld?
This poll will close on 16.06.2015 at 08:40
Absolutely! 4 80.00%
I don't understand what you're talking about?! Of course it's needed! 1 20.00%

A slightly strange poll from D'Arca


User Avatar
#36
Auto-translated
A strange poll... I understand what it's about, but I don't care about the rating, so which option should I vote for? ;)
296524052
Весна 2012.
User Avatar
#37
Auto-translated
I would also add the item "Yeah!!! So that there are more medals in the season!!!"
http://ru.twitch.tv/lizard_wt
In reply to =Lizard=
User Avatar
#38
Auto-translated
=Lizard=
I would also add the point: "Yessss!!! So that there are more medals in the season!!!" (c) )))
This season, instead of medals, there will be certificates of honor :D
296524052
Весна 2012.
User Avatar
#39
Auto-translated
A truly incomprehensible vote...
Всё будет хорошо!!! Только неизвестно когда... НО ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО БУДЕТ!!!
Но!...
Слушай всех, прислушивайся к немногим, решай сам...

In reply to злой_романтик
User Avatar
#40
Auto-translated
evil_romantic
Strange poll... I understand what it's about, but I don't care about the rating, so which option should I vote for? ;)
I'm voting for the second option! ;)

Regarding those who voted and don't understand what it's about:
Dagr was recently banned, so of course, he doesn't understand what it's about :)
Diabler was in a long AFK state, so he probably doesn't understand either.
Gomunguls - Vitla has 6 reports in this long season.
kalababa - this guy isn't even registered in the season, WTF!?
KobRa_RR - Artem has 0 reports )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
MaxGor - 1 report in the season.
u2noob - buddy, I understand that we have mutual dislike, but why vote for an option just because I created this topic, and not someone else? :cool:

Let's draw conclusions and keep in mind that many of those who voted don't even have any reports, even though the season has been going on for a long time:smile32:

лето 2012.
#41
Auto-translated
Ed, this kind of poll reminds me of the debate about whether a GM overhaul is needed. Elections without a choice. And again, after that, there's a recount of the undesirable results. Many of those who play do so without submitting reports, either because they don't want to write a report or don't see the point in a rating. Some only play tournaments and don't have much time to play a season. Think about how accurate a seasonal rating is. Player X can play 50 games in a season with a 70% win rate. Player Y can play 5 games in a season with a 100% win rate, and all the games are against Player X. In this case, Player X will be ranked higher than Player Y, simply because Player Y doesn't have enough time to play. I have nothing against ratings; they are probably needed to motivate players, but that's all.
Когда рестартов не осталось, обязательно ждите Гурниссона без балисты:D

Комплимент который сделал мой день:
Катя ЭПИК барышня) вы бы видели как пялились на её сиськи молодёж) я та с девушкой был) но всё равно пялился ) потому что хорошие) (с) Browser

Слабая раздача, которую заиграл исключительно из-за колпака на 111. (с) Сатир

In reply to aka.Ward3n
User Avatar
#42
Auto-translated
The rating itself serves as an indicator of the player's activity at a given time. However, for the player statistics currently being developed, reports are needed. Therefore, it is best to always write reports so that a clear picture emerges in the end.


In reply to KobRa_RR
User Avatar
#43
Auto-translated
A seasonal rating isn't really necessary for me personally, but a permanent one is quite useful. And in most cases, it reflects a player's skill quite well.
In reply to Wicc
User Avatar
#44
Auto-translated
Wicc
I personally don't need a seasonal rating, but a permanent one is very useful. And in most cases, it reflects a player's skill quite well.

But isn't the permanent rating made up of seasonal ratings from different seasons?
http://ru.twitch.tv/lizard_wt
In reply to Wicc
User Avatar
#45
Auto-translated
Wicc
I personally don't need a seasonal rating, but a permanent one is quite useful. And in most cases, it reflects a player's skill quite well.
as Konstantin already said, the permanent rating is the sum of seasonal ratings:cool:

Added 2 minutes later
aka.Ward3n
Ed, this poll reminds me of the debate about whether a GM restructuring is needed.
An election without a choice.
And again, there's a recalculation of those who are disliked.
Many of those who play do so without reporting, because they don't want to write reports or don't see the point in a rating.
Some only play tournaments and don't have much time to play a season.
Just think about how adequate a seasonal rating is.
Player X can play 50 games in a season with a 70% win rate.
Player Y can play 5 games in a season with a 100% win rate, and all the games are against Player X. In this case, Player X will be higher in the rating than Player Y, simply because Player Y has less time to play.
I have nothing against the rating; it's probably needed to motivate players in some way, but that's all.
The season is primarily a stimulus for many players who don't actively participate (with the exception of Andryukha) to play Heroes, specifically on the Hive. It's also an additional indicator of activity (it may not be objective, it may not be correct, but it exists).
And comparing running a season, which is a MUST BE anyway (we're just discussing the replacement of the person running it), with restructuring the GM, well, I don't know... they're completely different things that have nothing to do with each other

лето 2012.