Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
lately, all anyone does here is propose polls on improving the game, while trashing those who keep the forum going. Pete doesn't have time to calculate ratings anymore, no one else can do the math, and if Kostya or angry Roma also give up on the forum, there won't even be anyone to run a tournament, and HeroesWorld will suffer the same fate as HeroesPortal. So, less drama and personal opinions, and more positivity.)
no need to make things up, according to Kostya, there are plenty of people who want to take this on, you just need to hand over the reins
Besides Leader and Dark, I don't see anyone else who would be interested in this topic.
We've already figured out that the results will be available soon. Nitro
Guys, my automatic ranking will be ready by June 1st (if Pete approves). Maybe Pete is waiting for my ranking, so he's not wasting time on calculating it.
Poll results: Is a rating needed on HeroesWorld? This poll will close on 16.06.2015 at 08:40 Absolutely! 4 80.00% I don't understand what you're talking about?! Of course it's needed! 1 20.00%
Strange poll... I understand what it's about, but I don't care about the rating, so which option should I vote for? ;)
I'm voting for the second option! ;)
Regarding those who voted and don't understand what it's about: Dagr was recently banned, so of course, he doesn't understand what it's about :) Diabler was in a long AFK state, so he probably doesn't understand either. Gomunguls - Vitla has 6 reports in this long season. kalababa - this guy isn't even registered in the season, WTF!? KobRa_RR - Artem has 0 reports ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) MaxGor - 1 report in the season. u2noob - buddy, I understand that we have mutual dislike, but why vote for an option just because I created this topic, and not someone else? :cool:
Let's draw conclusions and keep in mind that many of those who voted don't even have any reports, even though the season has been going on for a long time:smile32:
Ed, this kind of poll reminds me of the debate about whether a GM overhaul is needed.
Elections without a choice.
And again, after that, there's a recount of the undesirable results.
Many of those who play do so without submitting reports, either because they don't want to write a report or don't see the point in a rating.
Some only play tournaments and don't have much time to play a season.
Think about how accurate a seasonal rating is.
Player X can play 50 games in a season with a 70% win rate.
Player Y can play 5 games in a season with a 100% win rate, and all the games are against Player X. In this case, Player X will be ranked higher than Player Y, simply because Player Y doesn't have enough time to play.
I have nothing against ratings; they are probably needed to motivate players, but that's all.
Когда рестартов не осталось, обязательно ждите Гурниссона без балисты:D
Комплимент который сделал мой день: Катя ЭПИК барышня) вы бы видели как пялились на её сиськи молодёж) я та с девушкой был) но всё равно пялился ) потому что хорошие) (с) Browser
Слабая раздача, которую заиграл исключительно из-за колпака на 111. (с) Сатир
The rating itself serves as an indicator of the player's activity at a given time. However, for the player statistics currently being developed, reports are needed. Therefore, it is best to always write reports so that a clear picture emerges in the end.
A seasonal rating isn't really necessary for me personally, but a permanent one is quite useful. And in most cases, it reflects a player's skill quite well.
I personally don't need a seasonal rating, but a permanent one is quite useful. And in most cases, it reflects a player's skill quite well.
as Konstantin already said, the permanent rating is the sum of seasonal ratings:cool:
Added 2 minutes later aka.Ward3n
Ed, this poll reminds me of the debate about whether a GM restructuring is needed. An election without a choice. And again, there's a recalculation of those who are disliked. Many of those who play do so without reporting, because they don't want to write reports or don't see the point in a rating. Some only play tournaments and don't have much time to play a season. Just think about how adequate a seasonal rating is. Player X can play 50 games in a season with a 70% win rate. Player Y can play 5 games in a season with a 100% win rate, and all the games are against Player X. In this case, Player X will be higher in the rating than Player Y, simply because Player Y has less time to play. I have nothing against the rating; it's probably needed to motivate players in some way, but that's all.
The season is primarily a stimulus for many players who don't actively participate (with the exception of Andryukha) to play Heroes, specifically on the Hive. It's also an additional indicator of activity (it may not be objective, it may not be correct, but it exists). And comparing running a season, which is a MUST BE anyway (we're just discussing the replacement of the person running it), with restructuring the GM, well, I don't know... they're completely different things that have nothing to do with each other