Posts from Forum

YaR, Hiwanna, Socrat... maybe they aren't newcomers to you, but for me, they are perfect for this tournament. Judging by your results, even a newcomer is too strong a competitor for you. But newcomers can be different; one recent newcomer almost won the main forum tournament, so what? And please tell me, in which tournaments have Hiwanna, Socrat, and YaR shown "good results"? And what do you consider a "good result"? A couple of wins in fun tournaments for Hiwanna? Because he doesn't seem to have played anywhere else.

Pit (10:31) :
Yara, I wouldn't allow that, but I'm not the only one there.

For some reason, I'm not the only one who thinks that, and there's no need to insult my ability to play if you can't properly select real beginners (those who are just starting their gaming journey and learning the basics) for a beginner tournament... You could call the strong players who crush beginners, and there would be no complaints, or at least remove point 3...

Don't confuse bitter with sour – Pete's opinion is Pete's opinion, but we have a different view. You still haven't answered, in which tournament did Socrates, Kivanna, and Yar show "decent results"? What are you nitpicking about in this third point? I repeat – they are strong only in your understanding; there are players in the tournament who are comparable to them in skill.

I will answer which tournaments, but first answer Socrates, Xivanna, and Yar – are they beginners? Those who are just starting their gaming journey and learning the basics of the game? If they are not beginners, then why are they in the tournament for beginners? To be more precise, I have two questions!

question: why create point 3 if it isn't followed?!

In the OFB, Yar scored 6 points out of nine, winning, in particular, against Valentok, Lizard, Chemist, and VanyaM (+2 tech wins or free slots; the reports only show four wins). For a newcomer, this is a really good result, but I don't think he should have been excluded; there have to be favorites in the tournament :)

Favorites, a newbie among newbies, I understand... but if you're going to include players of that level in a tournament for newbies, let them compete in one group, so that there's at least some balance in the group, or at least so that all participants in the tournament play each other at least once, and based on these results, create groups, like a qualifying round for groups, who goes into which group!!!...

Good lord, what nonsense you're spouting – putting the strong in one group...::smile35: Are you unaware that in any sport, the strongest teams are actually divided into different groups? Should we put Barcelona, Real Madrid, Manchester, and Bayern in the same group in the Champions League? So that teams like Basel have a better chance. Although, yes, you probably don't know, otherwise you wouldn't be writing this rubbish.
P.S. If you don't like the tournament, don't play, but please stop whining. Personally, I'll think twice before adding you to any of the tournaments I organize.

After the Redwhite-Nitro AK match, a decision was made: the match must be replayed, and the hat bug is now prohibited.

It seems like the AK rating couldn't possibly drop any further, but apparently...

After reviewing the Redwhite-Nitro AK match, a decision was made: the match must be replayed, and the hat bug is now prohibited.

Is this a hint at a roster change? ;)

When decisions are made incompetently, when only one of the tournament games is replayed, and the rules of the game are changed and supplemented not by a decision of the entire community, but by the Tournament Committee, it kind of hints at something, you know.