Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
civil rights -1 industry: information technology -1 scientific advancement -7
Damn it :mad: You're saying the second option was bad?
The second option would have added +7 to SA, but it would have had a negative impact on everything else, including healthcare, social assistance, self-defense forces, and much more.
all issues decrease pacifism increase taxes :( and it's not even worth it. One buffed public transport by 2 points and changed nothing else, the second buffed religiosity (+1), scientific and technical development (+1), but decreased pacifism (-1). And this cost a tax increase from 40% to 45%
..разым двазым трызым рызым пята лата сигерь мата локом боком крюк за крюк из бульмы бульма урюк.. Знание некоторых закономерностей освобождает от изучения многих фактов. Мечты сбываются рано или поздно, так или иначе.
Ment
Auto-translated
Yes, taxes in NS are a whole different story. I don't know where these huge numbers come from... They are clearly inflated by a factor of two.
reduce pacifism raise taxes :( and it' same not even worth it. One buffed public transport by 2 points and changed nothing else, the second buffed religiosity (+1), scientific and technical development (+1), but reduced pacifism (-1). And this cost a tax increase from 40% to 45%
My Steelmen have normal taxes. Want me to make yours the same?
Where do we go? Where do we end up when we save the world?
So, I'm just dismissing one after another. Here's another ridiculous example:
Recent reports revealing that the dental health of Tarpaulin Fields is far below the regional average have ignited a fierce debate over whether to introduce fluoride to the nation's tap water reserves. The Debate
“Fluoride has been shown time and time again to promote dental health,” argues Dr. Edwin Namel, Chairperson of 'Friends of The Teeth'. “It’s not an experimental drug for heaven’s sake, it’s an accepted method of promoting national good health. A nationwide program for the fluoridation of drinking water should not be seen as optional – it’s a no-brainer for any sensible government. We need to implement this now, whether the public want it or not.”
“I am strongly against this proposal!” rages Falala Pushkin, one of the more vociferous members of the Tarpaulin Fields Green Society. “When I turn on the water tap I expect to get just that. Water. Nothing else. We are not lab rats and it is not the government’s place to force us into taking these chemicals! In fact I reckon we should put the brakes on all these new chemicals doctors keep pumping into people and give us the right to say no!”
“There’s no need to go to either extreme,” says Samuel Peters, your personal dentist. “It’s all about, um, choice. Here’s a nice alternative: why not just have clean non-fluorinated drinking water and give more funds to dentists? If we had enough money, we could make all dental care absolutely free! It will be demanding on the taxpayers I know, but they’ll surely be happy when they all have sparkling white teeth!”
..разым двазым трызым рызым пята лата сигерь мата локом боком крюк за крюк из бульмы бульма урюк.. Знание некоторых закономерностей освобождает от изучения многих фактов. Мечты сбываются рано или поздно, так или иначе.
Arandor
Auto-translated
well, in that case, there are no good options at all.
that's just me dismissing units one by one. here's another stupid example
It's only stupid for those who are stingy with their troops...
Where do we go? Where do we end up when we save the world?
Sesame
Auto-translated
The first point is irrelevant; people decide for themselves what to do with their health (and their lives in general). The second point is also irrelevant; I won't undermine the healthcare system that has been built with so much effort. The third point is irrelevant because I do care about people and don't intend to raise taxes for questionable programs. Those who need it can go to the dentist at their own expense, not at the public's expense.
..разым двазым трызым рызым пята лата сигерь мата локом боком крюк за крюк из бульмы бульма урюк.. Знание некоторых закономерностей освобождает от изучения многих фактов. Мечты сбываются рано или поздно, так или иначе.
Ple-Sen
Auto-translated
Are you an idiot? They're suggesting that the army should take control of the state.
Artsakh's army already controls the country, which is why he's considering this option as "continuing to fund the military." Honestly, it's obvious.
The first point is irrelevant; people decide for themselves what to do with their health (and their lives in general). The second point is irrelevant (I won't destroy the healthcare system that was built with so much effort). The third point is irrelevant because I do think about people and don't plan to raise taxes for questionable programs. Those who want to, can go to the dentist at their own expense, not at the public's expense.
Well, those who want to can go to a private hospital at their own expense.
