Skip to content

Posts from Your morality.

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
In reply to Ganymed
User Avatar
#33
Auto-translated
Ganymed;76590
The scariest thing is that it was precisely faith... politicians didn't kill, it was those who had faith who killed...
And who was in charge? Politicians directed those who kill! They don't necessarily kill with a sword or spear, etc. And they are no less guilty! They pushed people into this war! And they have no less blood on their hands! And it's not about faith! They simply hid their desire to seize more land, loot more money, etc., under the banner of faith! But it wasn't faith! The common soldiers had faith! And they killed, which is so sad((((But I personally can't kill a child! You have to become callous in your soul to do that!
#34
Auto-translated
I think that even back then, there were compassionate Knights, it's just that history doesn't know about them because, naturally, they kept their good deeds secret.
User Avatar
#35
Auto-translated
Tengro;76303
Many here believe that there is Absolute Light and Absolute Darkness.
So...
Imagine this situation.
The First Crusade, you are in the crusader army, and after taking the city, the commander orders to kill all prisoners. Among them is a boy, about six years old. You can save him, risking your life. But... you can also carry out the order and take on the sin of killing an innocent... although a pilgrimage will remove all sins, so what difference does it make, more or less...

What would YOU do?
P.S. In a month, I will give an answer to all possible scenarios.
It all depends on the dogmas and upbringing. If you consider the task itself and its execution to be more important, and you believe it to be of the highest importance (in this case, the crusade), then you will try to follow this task and its principles, no matter what, i.e., you will kill the child. But if moral principles are most important to you, then you will not kill the child. Although there are many other perspectives! In general, this situation is very complex, especially if you consider those times and that fanaticism, and the role of faith. Of course, if you killed a hundred such children or women, you would be considered a defender of your faith and people, and you would feel like one. But, it is interesting, how would your conscience torment you? Or maybe it would be dormant? Or maybe it would calm down a little after you repent. Who knows... I would probably act like the crusader, although I don't know.


User Avatar
#36
Auto-translated
I probably wouldn't be a Crusader. Even if I were, I wouldn't kill a child. You can't kill children; it's more than immoral. I also wouldn't sacrifice my life for him, because by killing me, the Crusaders would also kill the boy. In the worst-case scenario, I would kill my commander, and if I succeeded, I would try to convince the others.
I've got a hole in my pocket!
© Ринго Старр




In reply to Machete
User Avatar
#37
Auto-translated
You see, you are responsible for our time! Now, I don't think any of you are as religious as people were in those times, especially the crusaders! Therefore, by claiming that it was right, you are not talking about that era, but about your own time. :) That's why I can't say what I would have done back then. There were different prejudices and dogmas back then. :)


In reply to Nowizard
User Avatar
#38
Auto-translated
Nowizard;76621
I don't know what I would do, but I definitely wouldn't kill him. Even if I had the full opportunity to do so. To be honest, if I had the power and means, I would disfigure him and tattoo "murderer" on his forehead. Let him live with humiliation and the realization that I could have easily killed him. Maybe that's cruel, but that's how I feel about my family.
Nowizard, my friend, don't forget that this boy is an "enemy," and not just any enemy, but a very dangerous one. If you spare him, they might not kill you, but one night, this kid will undoubtedly slit your throat, and he will be completely right. You came to his land, killed his people, destroyed their homes, and committed other bad deeds... But that's nothing; your comrades will grieve and bury you. The worst thing is if this boy throws a rabid dog into the well from which your entire army gets its water. And then your battle buddies, with whom you fight, scout, and go out for fun, will die of the plague. How will you look them in the eye?
And you can be sure that he will do something like that; he has absorbed from birth that killing a "non-believer" is not a sin but a heroic act before the Almighty.:cool:
As for me, I would most likely kill him; at least, I know that he wouldn't suffer before death.:smile10:
User Avatar
#39
Auto-translated
Tengro;76303
Many here believe that there is Absolute Light and Absolute Darkness.
So...
Imagine this situation.
The First Crusade, you are in the crusader army, and after taking the city, the commander orders to kill all prisoners. Among them is a boy, about six years old. You can save him, risking your life. But... you can also carry out the order and take on the sin of killing an innocent person... although a pilgrimage will absolve all sins, so what difference does it make, more or less...
If I've reached the point where I joined the order of crusaders... Duty is duty, it must be fulfilled, and warriors like the crusaders cannot hesitate or delay - otherwise, you and your comrades will be in the place of that boy.
P.S. And in general, run to the assassins, get high, run across rooftops, and kill arrogant crusader pedophiles:)
In reply to Night
User Avatar
#40
Auto-translated
I'll kill him. An order is an order.
Подмосковный рейнджер, не ведающий стаха
User Avatar
#41
Auto-translated
A blunder...
I didn't think the boy might grow up and seek revenge; a small, living captive who is unwanted by anyone is very dangerous (like a dog and a slit throat), so, unfortunately... There are two options here: if the boy was found in the middle of a field, I'll let him go (he will remember that there are noble people among the Crusaders), but if he's from a city that was destroyed, I'll kill him (he's too angry and will try to get revenge).
User Avatar
#42
Auto-translated
A Muslim? Is the boy a Muslim? It would be foolish to let him live:

1) The boy will grow up and become just as ruthless a warrior and killer as his people.
2) The fact that you save him will only fuel anger and hatred in his heart for the humiliation you inflicted by saving him. Or do you think he can live knowing that as an adult, warriors will spit in his face and shout that he is a slave of the infidel who saved him?
3) The boy will die anyway. Without food, in a burned-out city, at the age of six. From illness, cold, hunger, or the sword of another Crusader.
4) It would be more merciful to send him to heaven; children's souls are pure, regardless of whether they are Christian or
In reply to Мугайс
User Avatar
#43
Auto-translated
Mugais;76801
I'll kill him. An order is an order.
Don't you feel bad? Mr. Terminator))))
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ - конец бесполезным темам
In reply to Archer
User Avatar
#44
Auto-translated
Archer;76787
Nowizard, my friend, don't forget that this boy is an "enemy," and not just any enemy, but a very dangerous one. If you spare him, your own people might not even kill you, but one night, this little one will undoubtedly slit your throat, and he will be completely right. After all, you came to his land, killed his people, destroyed their homes, and committed other bad deeds... But that's nothing; your comrades will grieve and bury you. The worst thing is if this boy throws a plague-ridden dog into the well from which your entire army gets its water. And then, your battle buddies, with whom you fight, scout, and go out for fun, will die of the plague. How will you look them in the eye?
And you can be sure that he will do something like that because he has absorbed from birth that killing a "non-believer" is not a sin, but a feat before the Almighty.:cool:
As for me, I would most likely kill him; at least, I know that he wouldn't suffer before death.:smile10:
You are right, in general. I said earlier that I wouldn't go on any campaigns:) I will defend my true homeland from these very crusaders.

Berserk, I thought about your post and completely agree. The only point that might slightly undermine (but not refute) everything else is that you take on a sin. Besides, you didn't give him life, and it's not up to you to decide whether to take it away or not. In any case, it's a complex issue, and you can argue about it for a very long time.
Бог есть любовь
In reply to Берсерк
User Avatar
#45
Auto-translated
Berserker;78535
Is he a Muslim? Is that boy a Muslim? It would be foolish to let him live:
1) The boy will grow up and become just as ruthless a warrior and killer as his people.
2) Even if you save him, anger and hatred will grow in his heart for the humiliation you inflicted by saving him. Or do you think he can live knowing that as an adult, warriors will spit in his face and shout that he is a slave of the infidel who saved him?
3) The boy will die anyway. Without food, in the burned city, at six years old. From illness, cold, hunger, or the sword of another crusader.
4) It would be more merciful to send him to heaven; children's souls are pure, regardless of whether they are Christian or Muslim...
The first point – or maybe the opposite – he will be grateful that you gave him another chance.
The second point – are you saying that the guy will live in the city of those he hates, and why would he kill his savior instead of these scumbags who are talking?
The third point – maybe he's not as stupid as you think, or the savior isn't so stupid as to abandon him to his fate after saving him!
The fourth point – and you, with a clear conscience, will continue to be an executioner – no, thank you!
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ - конец бесполезным темам
In reply to Alex Ghost
User Avatar
#46
Auto-translated
Alex Ghost;78544
First, or perhaps the opposite – he might be grateful that you gave him another chance.
Second, are you suggesting that this guy would live in the city of those he hates, and why would he kill the savior instead of these scoundrels who are talking?
Third, maybe he's not as stupid as you think, or the savior isn't so foolish as to abandon him to his fate after saving him!
Fourth, and to continue being an executioner with a clear conscience – no, thank you!
Except for the last point, I can't agree (although I would like to). Muslims have a completely different psychology and philosophy. It's not just a different religion – it's a different way of life (as is the case in any country). In Islam, if a warrior dies fighting against infidels, he is guaranteed to go to Paradise (or something like that. I'm not very familiar with Islam). In Orthodoxy (as in Catholicism – I don't know), it's a bit more complicated, but the essence is the same. Christians who die for their faith or for their homeland are personally welcomed into Paradise by God! So don't jump to conclusions.
Бог есть любовь
User Avatar
#47
Auto-translated
What a discussion ensued. And all they asked was to answer a simple question. And the answer can only be unambiguous.
And, by the way, for Muslims, only pagans are considered infidels; Christians are not included in that category.
Мы спасемся? Я не знаю. Верьте...
Геройский Интернационал
Клан Homo homini - основатель клана
Член РКСМ с 07.07.07.
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ!- сообщить о бесполезной теме/сообщении.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: Emil

Users Online 3 users 1343 guests