Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The clue seems rather simple. What worries me more is that the city dwellers might be killed soon. Unless, of course, the gentlemen maniacs intervene. Execute Larisa
Zybr
12 years ago
Auto-translated
You should write something about each personality. It would be much more helpful.
Al-Parazon
12 years ago
Auto-translated
By the way, why do so many people like Ooot? Honestly, out of all of them, he's the one I like the least. With his quirks, it's as if he's shouting, "Hey everyone, I'm not a mafia member." Or maybe not a maniac. However, this is just speculation for now.
Added 2 minutes later Zybr
You should write something about each person:) It would be much more helpful.
But how can I write something if everyone is silent? There's almost no one to suspect. Almost.
Zybr
12 years ago
Auto-translated
By the way, why do so many people like Ooot? Honestly, out of all of them, it's the one I like the least. With its quirks, it's like it's shouting, "Hey, I'm not a mafia member." Or maybe not a maniac. But that's just speculation for now.
Well, nevertheless, that's what people like about it. It's simple: in a matchup between Ooot and an inactive player, I think most people would choose the inactive player, even if the chances of negativity are 50/50 or even 60/40.
Zybr
12 years ago
Auto-translated
How can you write anything if everyone is silent? There's almost no one to suspect. Almost.
Well, based on who's here.
I, Pobeditel, Ment, MayKhainess. So, I understand you have a negative attitude.
Well, nevertheless, that's what people like. Just comparing "very active" vs. "inactive," I think most would choose "inactive," even if the chances of a negative outcome are 50/50 or even 60/40.
Well, I don't know. In my opinion, "inactive" is better. "Inactive" is harmless as long as it doesn't write anything.
Zybr
12 years ago
Auto-translated
Well, I don't know. In my opinion, it's better to have inactive players. Inactive players are harmless as long as they don't write anything.
Actually, it's the opposite. It's impossible to determine who the inactive players are. You can only identify them by their non-aggression pacts. But you can determine the stance of those who write. Whether it's positive or negative. Therefore, if dealing with inactive players is essentially a gamble, you can at least figure out something with active players. And simply, from a moral standpoint - we're here to play the game, not just to send non-aggression pacts.
Ooota was ranked based on his knowledge of certain details that I won't describe. The others were ranked based on some strange reactions and their contributions to the forum. Overall, I only seriously suspect Ooota; the rest are just "keeping an eye on them."
Actually, it's the opposite. It's impossible to identify someone who doesn't write. Only through some kind of non-disclosure agreement. But you can determine the stance of someone who does write. Both positive and negative. Therefore, if dealing with non-active players is essentially a gamble, you can somehow determine the stance of active players. And simply, from a moral standpoint - we've gathered to play, not just to send non-disclosure agreements.
Exactly. Not just sending non-disclosure agreements. And those who also write raise more suspicion. Because they write :D
Zybr
12 years ago
Auto-translated
Those who also write deliberately raise even more suspicion. Because they write.
Well, let them:)
Драккошка
12 years ago
Auto-translated
Anyone who mindlessly sends in Neutral creatures will end up like Gur did yesterday.
