Posts from Forum

Chingiz, thanks, you cheered me up! :D

It’s so nice to return to the old, good forum without any politics :)

Chingiz is Captain’s alter ego, only more talkative, and for some reason, he diligently cleans the message counter.

This is quite a lengthy thread. Has the average Heroes player's skill level somehow decreased? They've churned out a ton of content, but what's the point? Sure, Mizrael might be a bit arrogant, but what does that have to do with his objectivity as a judge? His vote is just one of seven. If you have complaints about the AK, voice them more clearly; what I'm seeing is extremely poor, in my opinion. No, the way Toganash presents his thoughts and their coherence is impressive; it's a pleasure to read, and he has the right to fight for justice, but it reads more like a desire to needle a member of the AK than to defend any principles of his own. The crowd insisted, didn't they?
If I had titled the thread "Fundamentals of Hero Ethics" without focusing on personalities, I would have received a lot of valuable responses, but instead, it's just another pointless argument. Accusing and condemning someone is the last thing you should do; there will always be those who want to spread rumors in murky waters. These "guys" thrive on it; I don't think I need to list any names, do I?
What has this thread ultimately achieved? Have people started to think worse of Mizrael and better of Numvan? Okay, but is that a good thing? Is there anyone more experienced and objective? Then step forward – I want to, I can, and so on. There just aren't enough hands. Not sharp tongues, but actual hands. If there's anyone who can do more than just talk, speak up, and you will be heard.

//whispering//
how are things going?

//whispering//
how are things going?

Yura, don't provoke him ;)

What is this forum? http://bitwars.org/

//whispering//
How are things going?

I'll tell you in Minsk.

I'll tell you in Minsk.

I won't be in Minsk.

I don't like the fact that the tournament rules include the following:
1 point is awarded for a win, 0.5 for a draw, and 0 for a loss.
This makes it advantageous to drag things out "until the very end," and when the deadlines start to approach, you can even come to an agreement. Perhaps there is a reason to limit the game time to a certain period, after which either one side surrenders, or the sides agree to a draw?
This applies primarily to regulations like those in the OFB, where "0.5" can decide the outcome. THIS IS NOT OUR WAY; LET THE LITRE ALWAYS DECIDE!!))

I didn't understand you; are you suggesting limiting the game time, say to 311 turns, and making Facebook mandatory? In my opinion, this is nonsense, and it has been discussed repeatedly. The situation of control versus rushing happens more than once.

He is more likely against a rigged "draw" that affects the tournament standings (passing to a higher level) – he has always been against such things.

//whispering//
how are things going?

Why whispering?

I carefully read the forum rules. I didn't find any direct or indirect prohibition on discussing political events. Yes, of course, politics doesn't fit into the forum's theme. But what if I start a topic: "Heroes of Might and Magic 3 online as a model for political events"? :)
For example, on the strategium.ru forum, dedicated to strategy games, everyone discusses political events, and nothing happens. No one closes them; they just live their lives.
I browsed various political forums in March, and compared to our platform, the level of inappropriateness is simply off the charts. We, on the other hand, are just an example of a gentlemanly debate.

If a player considers himself a strategist, he will inevitably be interested in politics. This is natural, as the ancient Greeks put it: man is a political animal.

Why in a whisper?

I carefully read the forum rules. I didn't find any direct or indirect prohibition on discussing political events.

Glory to the Heroes (of Might and Magic)!

The modern political trend is that written rules matter less and less to people.

If a player considers themselves a strategist, they will inevitably be interested in politics. This is natural, as the ancient Greeks put it: man is a political animal.

According to the latest trends, being interested in politics is the same as guessing your opponent's respawn point on map 111.

There is a direct (not indirect) decision from the forum moderator (post 5563) that any political argument will be deleted, regardless of who is right. The forum was not created for this purpose; I will delete everything and issue warnings, up to and including bans. If this doesn't suit you, there's Kostya Dirty, Pit, and the Creator – complain to them. Wicc, Yura, I respect you very much, but you are increasingly trying to start another fire here – I don't understand why you need it.

According to the latest trends, being interested in politics is like guessing your opponent's response on turn 111.

I agree...:smile20:

He's more against a rigged "draw" that affects the tournament position (passing to a higher level) – he's always been against that.

I was, am, and will be against a rigged draw :cool: