Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I've been thinking about it. Among the Orcs, there are two candidates: the Ogre and the Standard Bearer. Actually, I'm not sure if Ogres can speak in full sentences, so among the Orcs, it's more likely the second one – the Standard Bearer.
If we consider the Dwarves, maybe it's the Chieftain; he could have killed again, although, perhaps he was just unlucky. Killing with him is generally effective, but I'm not sure.
The Engineer might be a possibility, but he doesn't seem like an executioner, and not a very ruthless killer. It doesn't quite fit.
The Miner isn't a good fit – after all, a pickaxe doesn't deliver a very impactful blow.
The rest don't fit based on their weapon type.
So, our killer is agile, intelligent, wise, armed with a bludgeoning weapon, and has a collection of "Che" quotes. Among the Orcs, the Standard Bearer fits, and among the Dwarves, I'd go with the Chieftain.
I think it's the Dwarf Chieftain. Of course, if the description is very, very accurate.
Most likely, I'm wrong. Maybe it was the Orcs who did the killing.
I'm writing because I need to write, but I have no idea what to write, and I can't figure it out right now because I have a module tomorrow. Where should I cast my vote, and who do I have evidence against?
There are clues here that point to half of the players, so choose based on your preference.
I think it's the Gnome Chieftain. Of course, if the description is very, very accurate.
That makes sense, but the description seems too abstract to draw any definite conclusions about the killer's identity. I remember at one point, I thought that roles with a sword might also fit, but I later dismissed that option.
Where should we cast our vote, and who do we have evidence against?
There's already a whole army of evidence against them.
I've been thinking about it. Among the Orcs, there are two suspects: the Ogre and the Standard Bearer. Actually, I'm not sure Ogres can speak in full sentences, so among the Orcs, it's more likely the second one – the Standard Bearer. If we consider the Dwarves, maybe it's the Chieftain; he could have killed again, although maybe he was just unlucky. Killing is generally effective for him, but I'm not sure. The Engineer – maybe, but he doesn't seem like an executioner, or a particularly ruthless killer. Doesn't seem likely. The Miner isn't a good fit – after all, a pickaxe doesn't inflict that kind of blow.
The rest don't fit based on their weapon.
So, our killer is agile, intelligent, wise, armed with a bludgeoning weapon, and has a book of Che's quotes with him. Among the Orcs, the Standard Bearer fits, and among the Dwarves, I'd go with the Chieftain.
I think it's the Dwarf Chieftain. Of course, if the description is very, very accurate. I'm probably wrong. Maybe it was the Orcs who did it.
I understand, but for some reason, I was more inclined to think it was the Ogre or the Ranger, and the latter is interesting because it could theoretically be Sab. But okay, we need to clarify all of this.
No, I'm just analyzing it from a purely logical point of view. An Ogre is slow and unintelligent. And he can't hide in the shadows. A Scout might be, by the way. But he's not strong enough to crush a skull with a mace. And his weapon is different. However, it's a valid point, I agree.
She miraculously dodged the first blow and tried to run away, but the second blow left no chance.
And if, for example, the Dwarf Chieftain has TWO weapons! Maybe he struck two blows almost simultaneously, with small pauses, right? Then the target definitely had no chance to escape, otherwise he would have had to lift one of the hammers for another swing. However, the Chieftain doesn't look like an executioner, and certainly not one sitting in ambush, that's true.
But if, for example, the Dwarf Chieftain has TWO weapons! Maybe he struck two blows almost simultaneously, with small pauses, right? Then the target definitely had no chance to escape, otherwise he would have been raising one of the hammers for a repeat swing. However, the Chieftain doesn't really look like an executioner, especially one sitting in ambush, that's true.
Actually, it might be correct. After all, it says that he should be an excellent tactician, and an ambush is also a type of tactic...
For now, let's assume that the dwarf commander was the one doing the killing, while the orcs were either stuck in a bottleneck or busy attacking someone else. I think many will agree with me.
This is more of a rough draft, just to get a general idea. We'll see how things develop and adjust accordingly. We'll analyze clues, patterns, behavior, psychology, sociology, mathematics, history, geography, literature, voices in their head, and anything else that's usually used to figure out who the Mafia are.
Ment
Heroist
