Posts from Мафия 68. The Witcher II
The new episode of "The Secret Circle," which will be released tomorrow, contains all the elements of a perfect horror: a storm outside, an unfamiliar house, a bottle of whiskey, a game of "truth or dare," a frightening scene in the bathroom, trusting, attractive teenagers, and a traitor among them. Cassie (Brittany Robertson) and her five friends will go to Henry's (Tom Butler) house, Faye's (Phoebe Tonkin) grandfather, to look for her grandmother.
It seems like this also fits *stop me, haha*. All the mysterious characters are somehow connected to the number 5. )))
Added 1 minute ago
The description is worrying because the role of the killer is fully revealed, although this shouldn't happen in a normal murder mystery.
By the way, I'm not a maniac.
e si ieu muoir, er mi grans deliuriers
The symbol of black magic is not a pentagram at all.
In general, it's better to count. I'm hesitant to execute a maniac because there might be an error, and an innocent person could be affected. Besides, evidence is just... evidence.
Alex was involved, but Mona only joined at 5 a.m.
Currently, there are 7 innocents in the game (Dag, Vesper, Arandor, Kitz, Sezam + 2 others who are not very clear), 3 Mafia, and 1 Maniac.
What if we start by targeting the Mafia and simply block the one we suspect is the Maniac? Triss didn't block anyone, as there's no indication. Let's say we eliminate one Mafia member.
By night: 2-1-7. In my opinion, it's better to protect those who are 100% innocent. That way, if the Mafia/Maniac does kill someone, they'll target someone unclear. This will prevent confusion during the day. Next. Let's assume Triss blocks Alex, who turns out not to be the Maniac. The Maniac's kill goes through. The Mafia commits 1 kill (there won't be a double kill because someone will definitely visit the known Arandor), and the Maniac also kills an innocent.
During the day: 2-1-5. All or almost all innocents are known because those guys killed unclear targets. We hang a Mafia member. By night: 1-1-5. Let's assume Triss is no longer in the game. The Mafia kills Arandor with their second kill. The Maniac also kills an innocent. Then 1-1-2. Victory... for the Maniac, right? (Sadness.)
I don't know. But are we sure Alex is the Maniac?
И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день
What if the monster hits a target it can't kill? Wouldn't that be reflected, right? Why do you think the monster didn't attack at all?
e si ieu muoir, er mi grans deliuriers
Maybe the bot just isn't firing – it's sitting quietly, casting a shadow on those who rarely log in...
In any case, the maniac needs to be executed.
What’s concerning in the description is that the killer’s role is fully revealed, even though that shouldn’t happen in a normal murder.
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empire_VIt might be something like this, perhaps.
And also, I suggest looking for clues related to female players. Maybe even based on the number of letters in their usernames.
I don’t know. But is Alex definitely a killer?
And if the killer targets someone they can’t kill, it won’t be reflected, right? Why do you think the killer didn’t shoot at all?
• Clues about the killers are given in the reports based on the user’s profile (username, avatar, signature, etc.). If the murder was unsuccessful, the killer will know this, but won’t know why it was unsuccessful. No clues are given for unsuccessful murders, except for those that the killer reveals themselves. The reports also contain a hint about the role of the deceased. Hints about the killer’s role are given in any case.
• When there are 8 or fewer players left in the game, hints about the roles of the killed, their killers, and the hanged players are NOT given.
• The following are not displayed:
1) checks
2) unsuccessful block (if the target cannot be blocked or if the target did not use night defense)
3) surveillance
4) unsuccessful healing
5) searching for Triss
6) gathering rumors
7) unsuccessful first lure
8) All actions with votes, except for depriving a player of their vote (blacklisting, removing an alibi, giving an alibi, etc.)
Знание некоторых закономерностей освобождает от изучения многих фактов.
Мечты сбываются рано или поздно, так или иначе.
Are you saying that it wasn't just the Mafia who killed him, but specifically the Boss?
Okay, take a look:
"Elf Leader" - the first attempt on Yorvet fails, and he kills his assassin.
"Witcher" - he doesn't kill for the Mafia (it doesn't work if he happens to encounter Yorvet's defense).
If Lynx were Roche, Yorvet would have died. If Yorvet had killed him, there wouldn't be any mention of Lynx coming to the elves herself. If you look at the sequence of moves, everything adds up. All that remains is to figure out why the Mafia weren't killed, maybe the assassination is interrupted when Yorvet is being targeted, or they were luring him, or something else.
For additional information, you can search for it online. And most likely, you need to look for clues related to the girl, that's also important.
Okay, I might not log in today. I hope to vote tomorrow if my health allows. The main thing is to find Yorvet, and we will practically be the winners.
"Empire B" – is it like for Lord? In my opinion, it's a bizarre clue.
Why won't it display?
The main thing is to find Yorveth, and we will practically be victorious.
Знание некоторых закономерностей освобождает от изучения многих фактов.
Мечты сбываются рано или поздно, так или иначе.
there wouldn't be any mention of Lynx coming to the elves on her own.
