Auto-translated
I agree, harpies are more advantageous in this regard. They have an inherent tactic, and it's not a bad one; it's very effective.
Пандора
Posts from Power Buildings
Auto-translated
Open
What kind of warriors do you hire when playing as the Faction of Force?
101
voters
Single choice
Sign in to participate in this poll.
Poll results will be visible after you vote or when the poll closes.
Пандора
Darth Saruman
Auto-translated
Of course! It's simple: they charge at the enemy, strike, and then receive a counterattack from the weakened enemy... But then, other enemy units start attacking them, and it's uncertain whether they will survive... Harpies will be in greater safety and rarely attack them. For example, there might be a suicidal fairy that you can't hide from behind a monster. But this is inevitable.
But what if a significant detachment of black dragons or other evil creatures flies up to your units?!... Nomads usually go first, deliver a counterattack, and then berserkers, monsters, etc., attack, depending on the strength of the unit...
Сила Тьмы - в бессилии света.
Нет невежества - есть Знание
Нет невежества - есть Знание
BASON
Auto-translated
But what if a substantial squad of black dragons or other undead flies toward your units?!... nomads go in among the first to soak up the retaliation, and then berserkers, behemoths, etc., depending on the unit's strength...
OptiMAL
Auto-translated
I'm for a harpy-cyclops-bird hybrid. The harpy is good because it moves away after attacking, avoiding retaliation. The cyclops is good because it's a ranged attacker, and a powerful one at that. And the bird is good because of its growth (4+) and the ability to attack with lightning.
:D
Darth Saruman
Auto-translated
I'm for a harpy-cyclops-bird combination. Harpies are good because they move away after attacking, avoiding retaliation. Cyclops because they are ranged attackers, and powerful ones at that. And a bird because of the 4+ bonus and the lightning attack.
Nah... a harpy will be very expensive (a Citadel costs 5000 gold - that's no joke!):(
Сила Тьмы - в бессилии света.
Нет невежества - есть Знание
Нет невежества - есть Знание
BASON
Auto-translated
I'm for a harpy-cyclops-bird combination. Harpies are good because they move away after an attack, avoiding retaliation. Cyclops because they are ranged attackers, and powerful ones at that. And a bird because of the 4+growth (+ potentially nobility) and lightning strike attack.
OptiMAL
Auto-translated
The base increase for Thunderbirds is 3. And 4 per week only after penning or nobility level 4. By the way, they are good for attacking. If they lived longer, they would be even better.
:D
BASON
Auto-translated
The more units you have, the less you care about losing them!
OptiMAL
Auto-translated
Well, that's debatable. You should cherish every unit. If you don't take care of your large army, you can only dream of victory.
:D
BASON
Auto-translated
And I’m not arguing that you need to preserve your army. But there’s a difference when, for example, you lose Berserkers or Birds. If you have to choose on the battlefield who to sacrifice, it won’t be as painful to lose a unit with a higher growth rate. And this doesn’t mean that I waste troops left and right, but there are no battles without losses! And these… (I’ve never heard such a curse word) Berserkers prove this almost every turn!
Пандора
Auto-translated
I like birds more than Chimeras. For the retaliatory thunder strike. I also really like the artifact "Hammer of Thunder" for the same reason.
As for who it's more upsetting to lose, I don't feel good when the opponent attacks my most valuable units and hearts appear with losses... :( Therefore, the more valuable my monster is, the more upsetting it is to lose it.
OptiMAL
Auto-translated
But there's a difference when, for example, you lose Berserkers or Birds.
If you have to choose on the battlefield which unit to sacrifice, it won't be as painful to lose a unit with a higher growth rate.
but in war, there are no battles without losses! ....
:D
Пандора
Auto-translated
Sooner or later, you get used to losses... You have to accept it. Although it's not exactly pleasant to bandage wounds and gather the remaining units bit by bit after another battle, slowly rebuilding your once invincible army. Although, I do love these battles! That's where the real fun of the game lies.
OptiMAL
Auto-translated
An army is not unbeatable because it has a billion creatures, but because it is controlled by an experienced player. If you play against a "smart" opponent who sends all his troops in a direct assault, you can win with an army that is twice as small.
:D
Zdob
Auto-translated
Nomad is better than Harpy (I thought Harpy was better too... when I was very young and didn't notice the Nomad, then I took a closer look... and realized it's better, and you can take a closer look too...). :D
I agree about the Cyclops... But again, it all depends on how long you plan to play. If it's just a quick game, then Fire Ogres are also very good.
And about the 4th-level creatures - definitely, the MONSTER is the best.
When you have 100% magic resistance, lightning doesn't do much.
And you can pin a bird to the ground with spider web arrows! :D
But the MONSTER, it even sounds scary! :D A TANK :smile1
I agree about the Cyclops... But again, it all depends on how long you plan to play. If it's just a quick game, then Fire Ogres are also very good.
And about the 4th-level creatures - definitely, the MONSTER is the best.
When you have 100% magic resistance, lightning doesn't do much.
And you can pin a bird to the ground with spider web arrows! :D
But the MONSTER, it even sounds scary! :D A TANK :smile1
HMM4 The Gathering Storm : BEST!:cool: