Skip to content

Posts from "Newcomer-2013. Winter" Auto-translated

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
User Avatar
#709
Auto-translated
The initial score of the super final is 0 - 0.
In reply to HellLighT
#710
Auto-translated
HellLighT
The initial score of the grand final was 0 - 0.
In my opinion, they decided to play a full double best-of-5 series with a 1-0 score for the sake of entertainment. Why should the score suddenly be 0-0?
Когда рестартов не осталось, обязательно ждите Гурниссона без балисты:D

Комплимент который сделал мой день:
Катя ЭПИК барышня) вы бы видели как пялились на её сиськи молодёж) я та с девушкой был) но всё равно пялился ) потому что хорошие) (с) Browser

Слабая раздача, которую заиграл исключительно из-за колпака на 111. (с) Сатир

User Avatar
#711
Auto-translated
for entertainment purposes, one player might give another a one-month head start or simply concede the victory, but here it's just a misunderstanding of the system.
In reply to HellLighT
#712
Auto-translated
HellLighT
for the sake of spectacle, one could give the other a head start of a month or simply concede the victory, but here it's just a misunderstanding of the system.
Why the misunderstanding? They understand everything correctly. If a full double-elimination system is played, and it's a best-of-5 in the final, then the player who came from the winner's bracket starts with a 1-0 score as a bonus for not having used their second chance.
Когда рестартов не осталось, обязательно ждите Гурниссона без балисты:D

Комплимент который сделал мой день:
Катя ЭПИК барышня) вы бы видели как пялились на её сиськи молодёж) я та с девушкой был) но всё равно пялился ) потому что хорошие) (с) Browser

Слабая раздача, которую заиграл исключительно из-за колпака на 111. (с) Сатир

In reply to HellLighT
User Avatar
#713
Auto-translated
HellLighT
The initial score of the grand final is 0 - 0.
If this is a full double elimination, the score should be 1-0, because otherwise the point of this system is lost:smile13:

лето 2012.
User Avatar
#714
Auto-translated
Why the misunderstanding? They understand everything correctly. If a full double-elimination system and a best-of-5 final are played, the player who advanced from the winner's bracket starts with a 1-0 score as a bonus for not using their second chance.
Actually, this mechanic works in both best-of-3 and best-of-5, but here, as in previous Novice tournaments, the starting score is 0-0.
p.s. and please, stop arguing.
p.p.s. especially for the gifted Darkella, the point of a full double-elimination bracket is in the loser's bracket, not in the score ratio of the super final.
In reply to HellLighT
User Avatar
#715
Auto-translated
HellLighT
Actually, this mechanic works in both Bo3 and Bo5, but here, as in previous Novice tournaments, the starting score is 0-0.
P.S. Please stop arguing.
P.P.S. Especially for the gifted Darkella, the point of Full Double Elimination is in the loser's bracket, not in the score ratio of the grand final.
I apologize, but they are right. In Full Double Elimination, they start with a 1:0 score. In regular Double Elimination, they start with 0:0.
User Avatar
#716
Auto-translated
Also, in Full Double Elimination, I play it like this: the player who comes from the losers' bracket must first play a best-of-three match to even the score, after which the final best-of-three match is played. Or, as the organizer says, that's how we play.
In reply to JustObserver
User Avatar
#717
Auto-translated
JustObserver
Also, in Full Double Elimination, I play it like this: the player who comes from the losers' bracket must first play a best-of-three series to even the playing field, after which the final best-of-three is played. Or, another option – play it as the organizer says.

There are Double Elimination and Full Double Elimination systems. If Anton ran it as a Full Double Elimination, the player who advanced through the winners' bracket should have a better situation than the player who already lost once and dropped into the losers' bracket. In the second variant of the system, this is not necessarily the case.

P.S.
Organizers, admins, sorry for the spam, I just had to say it. Especially for Hellight, it means I should have written Double Elimination (the word "full" is then irrelevant).

лето 2012.
In reply to Dark
#718
Auto-translated
darkello
clown.
The system can be either double elimination or full double elimination. If Anton used a full double elimination system, then the person who advanced through the winners' bracket should have a better situation than the person who already lost once and was relegated to the losers' bracket. In the second system, this is not necessarily the case.

P.S.
Organizers, admins, sorry for the spam, I just had to get it off my chest.
Specifically for Hellight, it means I should have written "Double Elimination" (the word "full" is then irrelevant).
To screw up and to lose, just think about this comparison and choose your words! I wonder how many times you've lost in the beginner bracket and not just in the beginner bracket, and in general, how many times have all the players in the Heroes movement lost! So, according to your judgment, all Heroes players, from the top players to the beginners, are "garbage."
IMHO - I think an apology should be offered to everyone, and not just to the organizers and admins, who, by the way, definitely lost too...
In reply to Gasik
#719
Auto-translated
Gasik
To shit yourself and lose, just think about this comparison and choose your words! I wonder how many times you lost in beginner mode, and not just in beginner mode, and in general, how many times have all the players in the Heroes community lost! So, according to your judgment, all Heroes players, from the top players to the beginners, are "garbage."
IMHO - I think an apology should be offered to everyone, and not just to the organizers and admins, who, by the way, definitely lost too...
I don't think Darkello needs to answer to anyone, especially not to you.
In reply to BlooDy)DriVeR
#720
Auto-translated
BlooDy)DriVeR
I don't think Darkello needs to answer to anyone, especially not you.
So, are you okay with the fact that you're in Haven, according to Darkello? And what does "especially not me" mean???
In reply to Dark
#722
Auto-translated
darkello
he already messed up once
I think it's clear who darkello was referring to, and it's just one person.
icq - 470286448
In reply to Gasik
#723
Auto-translated
Gasik
So, are you okay with the fact that you're in Haven, according to Darkello?
And what does "especially in front of me" mean???
I'm not claiming the title of "Newcomer" winner; you went through the losers' bracket, which means High should have an advantage. Darkello wouldn't say that to me, and this message was addressed specifically to you. And "especially in front of you" just refers to the number of posts on the forum; it's unclear who you are, in my opinion, you're just someone's fake.
In reply to BlooDy)DriVeR
#724
Auto-translated
BlooDy)DriVeR
I'm not claiming the title of "Rookie" winner; you went through the losers' bracket, so High should have the advantage. Darkello wouldn't say that, and this message was addressed specifically to you. And "especially in front of you" – it's just the number of posts on the forum; it's unclear who you are, in my opinion, you're someone's fake.
So, just because you know Darkello, when you lose, you do it gracefully, but when I lose, it's a disaster. It seems your little garden is bothered by the fact that I'm in the final, and by the way, it wasn't me who wrote that the final score was 0:0; after the first game, I thought the score was already 2:0! And regarding your opinion about me being a fake, that's your business; I won't interfere with that. I wouldn't have written anything at all in response to this Darkello's post, but since he already wrote it, I had to respond, and it's also directed at me. There will be no more responses to provocations, I hope the point is clear!