Posts from Total for the game twaryna vs =Stinger= Auto-translated

Article 14.1.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation :)

Well, this is another nuance, yes. :)

Article 14.1.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation :)

Javdet doesn't care, he's from Ukraine :)

It would be good to consult with a lawyer. As far as I know, without generating profit, none of this constitutes an organization.

Article 14.1.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation :)

Javdet is not from Russia :cool: so you can send him the laws of China as well, I think it would be interesting for him to read and see what would happen if... :D

This should be presented in a similar way to what I recently mentioned, with a slight twist: you buy virtual tokens (by donating to the organizer) and use them for a certain period. Then, when you want to convert the tokens back into money, you talk to the organizer, and they "buy" them from you. And there's no need to shout about earning 10% from bets. :)

It would be good to consult with a lawyer. As far as I know, without extracting profit, this doesn't constitute an organization.

10% is certainly not profit, but just a bookmaker's margin:p

Zhavdet doesn't care, he's from Ukraine :)

Ukraine also has laws. In any case, a group of dedicated people is working on this day and night, sparing no effort. But since Kostyan hasn't been arrested yet, let's take a risk)))
By the way, I largely agree with NumVan, but I'm in favor of doing something, especially since the ground is ripe for it. Whether the venture succeeds or fails isn't that important. What matters is the initiative. Perhaps it will inspire others to do something similar, like what's happening with streaming now.

Romka clearly borrowed my idea for a sweepstakes :) I used to organize sweepstakes every year at the continental championships... but that was around 2005-2008. There, 10% went to the organizer, another part went to the player who won, and the remaining percentage of the losing amount was distributed among the winning bets. But here, I think it won't work - I had virtual money and an Event. And here, there are dollars and a superbison game against some kind of creature :) - although there are sometimes victories for the generator, but there's no excitement here.

In general, this activity is, of course, illegal. Moreover, the media announced today that even lotteries in Ukraine will be abolished because they are considered gambling. What consequences this will have – at the current scale, it certainly won’t have any significant impact. If the turnover increases, they will become interested.

Don’t attack Roma; let him entertain himself and the forum. What difference does it make if it’s right or wrong? If you want to participate, do so; if you don’t, don’t. If you want, open your own bookmaker. I would understand if someone unknown or suspicious was involved, but in this case, criticism is inappropriate.

I checked with a lawyer. The concept of a "totalizer" is not legal in our country, but "sports prediction" is perfectly legal, so Javdet won't be arrested... maybe.

In my opinion, in this form, the betting pool is viable, although it's important to make an effort to communicate the odds to people. Problems like everyone betting on the first team are unlikely to occur in this particular match, and even if the odds are 100 to 1, someone will definitely place a bet.

In my opinion, in this form, the betting system is viable, although you need to make an effort to communicate the odds to people, and problems like everyone betting on the 1st player are clearly not specific to this match, and when people see 100 to 1, someone will definitely bet =)

A betting system in this form and a system with odds are fundamentally different. In the second case, the organizer sets the odds and is responsible for them. He should be guided by the strength of the players, and not by who more people will bet on.
And another major drawback of the system proposed by Javdet is the lack of interest in betting more than the minimum 50 rubles; moreover, it is not even profitable. Why bet 500 rubles if the maximum you can win will barely cover the organizer's percentage?

In short, there won't be a movie. Or rather, a movie from Stinger and Tvarina will be available any minute now. But no one volunteered to create one, or they didn't have time, so we're closing shop.

And if you implemented decent coefficients and a proper payment system, things would really take off. I, for example, would invest.

You could also just make a betting competition without using real money. But I guess for hardcore russians thats not really interesting.