Posts from "King of the Hill"

Question for Namvan: how many players are currently participating in the tournament?

No comments :cool:

...Since the tournament is year-round and has just begun, it's impossible to objectively assess whose rights have been violated and whose have been exaggerated. The results or a comparative analysis (statistics) should be conducted after 0.6 or 1 year of gameplay.

P.S.
RebE, please explain to me, as someone who struggles to understand, what exactly you objected to with Namvan - just in plain language and without any hidden meanings - I want to understand.

Question for Namvan: how many players are actually participating in the tournament at the moment?

The host had refrained from assessing anyone's chances of participation since the tournament rules were announced, relying on randomness, as stated in the regulations. Moreover, the immutability of randomness was emphasized. Fine, let it be.
But during the discussion, the regulations were significantly changed, even though they had supposedly been "carefully considered" beforehand. Never mind. This happened before the tournament started.
But even after the tournament began, the rules (specifically, the tournament format) were changed within a short period, smoothed over by the term "adjustment." But it's still a change!
I have a very negative attitude towards changing the rules during a tournament; it at least raises doubts. But if there is a need to change the rules, it should be done systematically, mentioning this in the regulations, and implemented at the end of a period, for example, a semester. Moreover, the change may be caused by certain events and should be motivated and justified. I regret the lack of transparency from the host in this matter. As well as the communication style: my specific, simple questions are called "grumbling" and "fierce attacks"

2rebellious
Why are you stirring up this circus in someone else's tournament? It seems you take pleasure in needling the organizer. All we ever see from you is the same old "grumbling" and "furious attacks" in this thread.

By and large, all the adjustments the organizer makes have almost no effect, and you could have just turned a blind eye to them like everyone else did. If I were the organizer, I'd have kicked you out of the draw entirely (if you're even in it, though I wouldn't be surprised if you just care about arguing for argument's sake).

I'd also like to suggest changes to the tournament rules, reducing the time allotted for a match from the moment it's scheduled. Currently, I think it's a week, but I'd reduce it to 3-4 days.

"It's time for you to get married, sir!" Or, at least, meet a girl.:D

I'm afraid I can't show you a picture of my girlfriend... you might climax just from looking at her.
And to the point, I don't think anyone will be able to hold the throne for more than 3 rounds, so I don't see anything special in your proposal.

I'd also like to suggest changes to the tournament rules, reducing the time allotted for a game from the moment an opponent is assigned. Currently, I think it's a week; I would reduce it to 3-4 days.

I'm afraid I can't show you a picture of my girlfriend... just looking at her might make you climax.
But to get to the point, I don't think anyone will be able to last more than 3 rounds as king, so I don't see anything special in my suggestion.

Show us a photo, and we'll guess how long it will last in that state given your gaming schedule.

I intend to hold the throne until my back aches and my buttocks go numb, so I'm absolutely against it. Even with a week off for gaming, it's hard to play something else in parallel.