Auto-translated
At first, I thought I had downloaded some garbage from the internet.
But it turned out to be a really cool game!!!!!
But it turned out to be a really cool game!!!!!
Posts from Discussion about Heroes 4.
Darth Saruman
Auto-translated
At first, I thought I had downloaded some garbage from the internet.
But it turned out to be a really cool game!!!!!
Are you talking about the fifth game or the fourth one?! (If you're talking about the fourth one – I'll kill you!:mad: )
Сила Тьмы - в бессилии света.
Нет невежества - есть Знание
Нет невежества - есть Знание
OptiMAL
Auto-translated
In my opinion, Heroes of Might and Magic V has only great graphics. Any game would envy it... Don't judge me too harshly.
:D
Пандора
Auto-translated
Well, whether the graphics are really that great is debatable. For example, in "Civilization IV," the graphics are, in my opinion, better.
Oh! There are also fans of Civilization here!!! Awesome, I love it too (but I think the third one is better).
Maybe I'm a conservative... But the graphics in the fifth Heroes game are actually pretty good. Maybe not the best, of course. This is actually its main qualitative difference from the third game. But I also like the graphics in the fourth game. In general, I've noticed that I prefer a compromise between 2D and 3D.
Here's another real-life example to confirm what I said earlier. I played a strategy game (Stronghold). I was completely obsessed with it, and I loved everything about it. Then Stronghold II came out with 3D graphics. But with it came different feelings. I can't play it with the same enthusiasm as the first one. The graphics seem great, and everything is well-drawn.
But I also noticed that there are a lot of bugs and unfinished elements. It's generally poorly designed.
Therefore, I've concluded that if developers focus all their attention on the graphics, the game will probably not be one of the best.
BASON
Auto-translated
Oooooo! There are even Civilization fans here!!! Awesome, I love it too. (but I think the third one is better)
Maybe I'm a conservative... But the graphics in the fifth Heroes game are actually pretty good. Maybe not the best, of course. But it's a significant difference from the third game. But I also like the graphics in the fourth game. In general, I've noticed that I prefer a compromise between 2D and 3D.
Here's another real-life example to confirm what I said earlier. I played this strategy game (Stronghold). I was completely obsessed with it, I liked everything. Then Stronghold II came out with 3D graphics. But with it came different feelings. I can't play it with the same enthusiasm as the first one. The graphics are great, everything is well-drawn.
But I also noticed that there are a lot of bugs and unfinished elements. It's not well thought out.
So I concluded that if the developers focus all their attention on the graphics, the game will... not be one of the best.
OptiMAL
Auto-translated
Yes, Stronghold is a good game. And in general, Stronghold 2 is also a great game, if not for the camera view. It's very distant, and when you zoom in, all the buildings and people look like smudges. :(
But let's get back to Heroes. Regarding the 2D combat, it just wouldn't work. It would be like a wall-to-wall battle. But with 3D, you can get creative.
But let's get back to Heroes. Regarding the 2D combat, it just wouldn't work. It would be like a wall-to-wall battle. But with 3D, you can get creative.
:D
Darth Saruman
Auto-translated
Okay, I'm back, someone's going to get it now!
Enough with the off-topic chatter here, we're discussing Heroes, not Civilization or Stronghold...:smile30:
So...:smile15:
Enough with the off-topic chatter here, we're discussing Heroes, not Civilization or Stronghold...:smile30:
So...:smile15:
Сила Тьмы - в бессилии света.
Нет невежества - есть Знание
Нет невежества - есть Знание
Пандора
Auto-translated
Okay, I'm back, someone's going to get it now!
Enough with the off-topic chatter here, we're discussing Heroes, not Civ or Stronghold...:smile30:
So...:smile15:
And you, are you trying to be a moderator now? :smile08: In any case, everything here is relevant. There's no off-topic chatter! :smile38: This is a comparative analysis for clarity and to confirm the trend:smile02:
OptiMAL
Auto-translated
But still, the fourth game is special. At least the graphics in the fourth game are much better than in the third. And the fifth one is... well, something's not right... It lacks something new, except for the graphics. So... the fourth game is forever!!! :D :D :D
:D
HiddenHorror
Auto-translated
In the 4th installment, the creature upgrade system isn't as clunky as it is. I never understood why the developers of the 5th game didn't adopt some of the ideas from the 4th game. Wouldn't you agree that creature upgrades significantly slow down the gameplay?
OptiMAL
Auto-translated
You are right. The Guild is there so that you have somewhere to spend your money in the Castle. :)
:D
HiddenHorror
Auto-translated
Hmm... so, according to the developers, at the beginning, they have too much money to spend?
Yeah.
Yeah.
OptiMAL
Auto-translated
I was speaking figuratively. I meant that in the fourth turn, I built Warriors and that's it. And in the third turn, I'll still have a headache trying to figure out where to get the money for the upgrade.
:D
HiddenHorror
Auto-translated
It's frustrating, to say the least. They could at least implement a feature to disable upgrades; you build the improved version right away.
Budda
Auto-translated
As I often say, Heroes IV is the best! But each game in the series is good and has its own flaws, just like the fourth installment...
Подпись была удалена Администрацией из за оскорбительного содержания. Просьба сменить подпись.