Skip to content

Posts from Мафия 62. The Witcher

Mafia Closed Topic
No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Haven, explain how you plan to kill Gerald and Triss if you can't break through their defenses, and you won't have an advantage during the day.
In reply to Дашенька
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
1) Who said that Amko is Triss? Or isn't? 2) And why are the Salamanders so eager to execute Triss? 3) Redirection is the most dangerous thing, and for everyone... 4) What's with Amko having a second voice?)))
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
If Amko wasn't Triss, the town would already be winning.
They're rushing because she's a double-voter, a blocker, immune to killers, and can also kill after the Herald.
The redirection only works on one person, and can affect two players. We have 4 Neutral players together, so it's not that dangerous. If you've already broken the alliance, you're making a big mistake.

"King's Advisor" - has a double vote.
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
I wouldn't be surprised if salamanders started attacking Haven at night and continued executing innocent people during the day. Then, they definitely won't be stopped.
In reply to Arandor
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Arandor
I wouldn't be surprised if salamanders shoot at Haven at night, and during the day they continue to execute peaceful citizens. Then they definitely can't be stopped.

The more you write, the more I want to play against you...
You convinced me - Execute Amko

Added 9 minutes later
Dашенька
Haven, explain how you are going to kill Gerald and Triss if you can't break through their defenses, and you won't have an advantage during the day.
1) When executing the Vishmaster, the advantage would still be 5 on 5, and even if it's at night - 2 mafia - 2 towns = 3 against 3, but the town has -1 vote... you would ensure it... and if you block the role-blocker, it could be -2 towns - 1 mafia
2) You can break through Gerald and Triss)))
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Haven decided to gift the victory to the Salamanders, that’s not cool =(
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
You almost want to lose) in that case, I advise you to defend your units at night.
I also did some calculations, and if there are 2 Mafia players against 2 Haven players, then Haven has a 100% chance of winning, if they guess correctly who to protect.
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
I see, things are very serious here. Very!
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Rudyy, cast your vote for Kitz.
In reply to Arandor
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Arandor
Red, cast your vote for Kitz.
I'm just wondering, what the hell made you guys rush to Kitz? She was peaceful throughout the entire game, lol.
If Haven doesn't want to negotiate, why not execute Adda, block Zig at night. Or redirect. And we have a kill and block/redirect on the salamander.

Added 1 minute ago
execute Kitz
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Rudyy, just vote) We don't have enough votes to execute anyone with a red vote!
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Amko, yes.
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
1) If Vishmaster is executed, the advantage would still be 5 to 5, and even if it's at night, -2 mafia - 2 town = 3 against 3, but the town has -1 vote... you would ensure... and with a blocker, it could be -2 town - 1 mafia.
2) You can eliminate Geralt and Triss)))
1. Considering the number of various neutral roles, my brain is overloaded with possible outcomes. I will only say that if Vish is executed, randomness has a greater impact on the number of our votes during the day. And if Triss is executed, even an unsuccessful move doesn't give the town an immediate advantage.
2. Yes, but it's not a certainty either; we seem to have only killed one of them in the game. Out of 4 nights.

Moderated: OFF-TOPIC in the message

The Order decided to gift the victory to the Salamanders, that's not cool =(
What's not cool is that the town is making bad decisions, sending neutral roles without thinking and not losing a high probability of winning. But the mafia is trying, both the old and the new ones. Therefore, giving the victory to one, the other, or dividing it at all is very fair.
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
It's not cool that a town just kicks ass, sending out mindless heroes and not losing a significant chance of winning. But both factions are trying. Therefore, giving the victory to one, the other, or splitting it – is quite fair.
Alliances kill the interest in the game even more than overpowered towns. Moreover, it kills the interest not only for those against whom the alliance is formed, but also for those who form it.

Moderated: OFF-TOPIC in the message

But, in reality, we all know which team will betray and screw over the other when the town is successfully eliminated.
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
How rude.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: recijeb