Posts from To Vigo or not to Vigo? That is the question. Auto-translated

2 Kilgor
2008/2009.
My stats:
season:
0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1/2, 1.
Total 7.5 out of 13, 57.7% (special thanks to Sir Gunnar for 3 consecutive losses).

Tournament
100%.

Here are my skill fluctuations.

))))) Funny) Wasn't I writing something relevant? The guy was accused of cheating, and one of the arguments was that he didn't immediately start defending himself and squealing like a stuck pig. I, by stating the basic principles of legal proceedings, wanted to convey that this argument was made up. So, in your understanding, "relevant" means only accusing the guy, and defending him is irrelevant?)) And never mind, sort it out yourselves. You can delete this message too, I allow it.

I think the presumption of innocence applies directly to this topic. Because one of the main arguments in favor of Vigo's guilt contradicts this fundamental principle.

It's just difficult to post while banned. A person is banned, and then they can't write anything (apparently, it needs to be repeated twice). Therefore, because a banned person can't leave posts, it's impossible to immediately submit an appeal.
PS. I don't believe Vigo was mapmaking. The thing is (Vitya, don't be offended): Vigo isn't very advanced in programs and computers. In short, he wasn't mapmaking. All this nonsense needs to be removed from him and from Vitalik. Vitalik is generally a different kind of person; all this scheming isn't for him: he's a reliable, good person. And he played a lot in clubs. You understand, in clubs! It's some kind of absurdity; you need to remove these guys from the lists. Well, if you can't admit your mistake publicly, just remove them and that's it, and let's forget about it. It's easy to remove a person from the game, but it's difficult to bring them back.

It's understandable that a person wants to know why they were banned, but I don't understand why you didn't raise the issue immediately after the ban was announced. Any honest player who was unfairly banned would have made a fuss and defended themselves so vehemently that few would have doubted their honesty. Instead, you remained silent, or rather, not entirely silent – you asked someone from the Arbitration Committee a question, received an answer, and seemed to calm down. This is very strange behavior for an honest player.

Vigo wasn't banned and even posted. Watch the "one for all" tournament.

It's also strange how you wrote the subject – as if you're demanding proof and facts, but there's not a word about you being falsely accused, that you're innocent; you just need to present everything in an organized manner.

It's just difficult to write posts during a ban. A person is banned and then cannot write anything (apparently, it needs to be repeated twice). Therefore, because a banned user cannot leave posts, it is impossible to immediately submit an appeal.

Brother, Vigo was banned from November 8th to November 15th.
If you don't believe me, ask the coordinators.

And here's another point:

"Message from numOne:
It's also strange how you wrote the original post – as if demanding proof and facts, but without mentioning that you were falsely accused, that you are innocent, and that you simply need to present the information in an organized manner."

Yes, I think this is quite justified based on the simple principle of "a person is innocent until proven guilty," which is the foundation of the judicial systems in leading countries. A person is not obligated to prove their innocence. The burden of proof lies with the accusers.

It's also strange how you wrote the original post – as if demanding proof and facts, but without mentioning that you were falsely accused, that you are innocent, and that you simply need to present the information in an organized manner, something you already know without our help. Well, we'll organize it, as there's plenty of material. Don't think that anyone caught you red-handed or filmed you (and even if they did, it wouldn't be proof, as it turns out), but there is enough evidence (as much as can be proven in Heroes regarding player substitution and map hacking) for the AC to vote for your ban.
Let the forum decide.

Brother, Vigo was banned from 8.11 to 15.11.
Don't believe me, ask the coordinators.