numOne
Auto-translated
And here's another point:
"Message from numOne:
It's also strange how you wrote the original post – as if demanding proof and facts, but without mentioning that you were falsely accused, that you are innocent, and that you simply need to present the information in an organized manner."
Yes, I think this is quite justified based on the simple principle of "a person is innocent until proven guilty," which is the foundation of the judicial systems in leading countries. A person is not obligated to prove their innocence. The burden of proof lies with the accusers.
Why are you taking quotes out of context?
It's also strange how you wrote the original post – as if demanding proof and facts, but without mentioning that you were falsely accused, that you are innocent, and that you simply need to present the information in an organized manner, something you already know without our help. Well, we'll organize it, as there's plenty of material. Don't think that anyone caught you red-handed or filmed you (and even if they did, it wouldn't be proof, as it turns out), but there is enough evidence (as much as can be proven in Heroes regarding player substitution and map hacking) for the AC to vote for your ban.
Let the forum decide.
The main argument for the ban was the amount of material, which was sufficient to judge Vigo's dishonesty. What you call "one of the main arguments of the accusation" is simply my observation, which did not influence the ban, as it was formed only after it. Don't confuse things.
And, as you already wrote, since you're "not in the know," please don't clutter the thread.
Пусть мой враг будет силен и страшен. Если я поборю его, то не буду чувствовать стыда.