Skip to content

Posts from M-200% No. 6

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
I don’t need to be in the rating! I just wanted to play some quick templates in a tournament. Let the winners write a report – I’ll confirm it, and it will count towards their rating. If needed, I can provide commentary. Especially for AK, so they don’t suspect anything.
In reply to numOne
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
numOne
Apparently not. :smile27:

There are exceptions to every rule. Besides, people should always be given a second chance. The case with Katerina confirms this. So, it's all up to the host's discretion.
In reply to Kilgor
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Kilgor
There are exceptions to every rule. Besides, people should always be given a second chance. This was confirmed by the case of Katerina. So, in this case, everything is up to the moderator.
You are a bit mistaken here; there is nothing in common between my case and Katerina's. But let's not discuss it here.
In reply to Vigo
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Vigo
I don't need to be in the ranking!
The tournament aims for official status, the organizers aim for the position of leading official tournaments, and the winner aims for a medal.
What's better – official status for the tournament or Vigo among the participants?
In reply to Vigo
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Vigo
You're a bit mistaken here; there's nothing in common between my case and Catherine's. But let's not discuss that here.

I was given a couple of links about you, and I took the time to read them. Yes, you're right; there's a big difference between Catherine and you. Catherine has improved, but you haven't. You were given a second and a third chance, and you failed them. I think there's no need to even consider the question of your participation.
13 years ago
pofigu
436602451
In reply to pofigu
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Guys, the tournament has become a tradition, and no one is going to change anything... and these slowpoke groups are just ridiculous. Calm down and enjoy the game!
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
maybe someone just wants to play for fun – that’s exactly what groups are for; if there are 5 people in a group, there’s a chance of making a mistake, even two mistakes.
____________________________

The person wants to play and promised to stream; I think we should give Vigo another chance.

In real life, we make even bigger mistakes, and that’s okay; we get a second, third, and even a 33rd chance there.
But here, we are so harsh and uncompromising towards someone who made a mistake.

In Heroes, as in any other gambling game, it’s natural that a person becomes prone to cheating and breaking the rules; that’s the nature of gambling, and there’s nothing surprising about it.

If we put ourselves in Vigo’s shoes, would we want to be given another chance or not?
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
No poll regarding groups will change the tournament system; you have the right to disagree with the regulations, but if that's the case, it's not entirely clear why you would register for it. Introducing groups will significantly affect the tournament's unique character, which I absolutely don't want to allow.
In reply to kalababa
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
kalababa
No poll regarding groups will change the tournament format. You are free to disagree with the regulations; if that's the case, it's unclear why you would register. Introducing groups will significantly harm the tournament's unique character, which I absolutely don't want to allow.
Plus 100 - Serga - a huge request to leave everything as it was in previous tournaments, regardless of what has been written here! ;)
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Yeah, I agree – there’s no need to listen to player feedback; it worked before, and it will work now.
In reply to JustObserver
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
JustObserver
Why should we even listen to the players' opinions?
:) yuuuuuuuuu
In reply to JustObserver
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
JustObserver
...there's no need to listen to the opinions of players...
actually, regardless of the forum rules, and based solely on basic ethics, one should refrain from making such statements.
If a tournament is well-planned, and especially if it has already been held in this way, it really should NOT be changed...
Those who want something exclusive, go ahead, arm yourselves with a basic TE-Editor program, implement your unique idea, create the necessary templates, or edit existing ones, create an original tournament and playoff system, and we'll discuss it here (in the appropriate forum topic) and, after the final editing, we'll test it out :smile02:. Firstly, you won't have to change existing ones, and secondly, you will be very protective :smile10: of any changes to your creation :smile16:

Added 5 minutes later
Qwerty
I support this. Vigo loves Heroes, he's a genuinely good person, let him have a chance to play a little, even outside the competition...
I would be very upset if I lost in the final due to unfair play by my opponent, but if he asked for forgiveness, I would definitely forgive him, especially since this is just a game, not life.
There should always be a chance... This is my opinion, both in life and in faith.
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
there's no need to listen to the opinions of the participants; because of their opinions, the tournament lost all its excitement when they switched to 4-minute matches! The only interesting thing left is the strength of mages on Might and Magic maps.
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
3134-85 264
positive

I want to play.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: recijeb