Auto-translated
The Hobbit is great.
Spoilers below.
Of course, it's not without its flaws. The main flaws are for the fans, because a lot of facts are distorted and presented in the film differently than in the book. There are minor facts that don't really affect anything, but they annoy people who remember the book well. Although, it didn't bother me much)
Another terrible flaw is the lack of blood on the weapons. You stab an orc, and the sword shines and sparkles. Do they really need that 6+ rating?
But overall, everything is great. The graphics are amazing (I watched it in IMAX), although the eagles look too computer-generated, as well as the hedgehogs and squirrels, haha. But I think it's still the case everywhere. They can't draw a truly realistic animal yet. Probably because in reality, there are no squirrels pulling sleds, or smart eagles knocking orcs off their feet and grabbing hobbits with their claws.
I don't know why Amko called the film mediocre. Maybe I'm just a big Tolkien fan. But in general, the film is really 6+, kids would like it, and adults too. As with the book.
In short, "The Hobbit" is neither better nor worse than the Lord of the Rings trilogy.
I just don't understand how they're going to make a trilogy. In the first part, more than half of the book has already passed, it seems to me.
By the way, there was a very good fight in the goblin caves. Tolkien didn't focus on this, because the story was about Bilbo, and in general, it seems that there was no battle at all. So Peter Jackson took advantage of this and added his own creativity. The battle turned out in the style of Pirates of the Caribbean.