Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Doctor Who Classic, I'm currently finishing the series with the Third Doctor, so there's still a lot to watch. The overall impression is very positive; it was a bit difficult to watch some of the restored episodes with the first two Doctors. By modern standards, everything is quite naive and drawn out, but I found only a few episodes boring; I enjoyed the rest.
I watched the latest Batman movie, and it hadn't even been six months since the DVD rips finally appeared in the store. I didn't really have high expectations, but the villain was terrible, the plot was awful, and everything felt bland and stretched out over three hours. It wasn't worth the money!
Spoilers below. Of course, it's not without its flaws. The main flaws are for the fans, because a lot of facts are distorted and presented in the film differently than in the book. There are minor facts that don't really affect anything, but they annoy people who remember the book well. Although, it didn't bother me much) Another terrible flaw is the lack of blood on the weapons. You stab an orc, and the sword shines and sparkles. Do they really need that 6+ rating? But overall, everything is great. The graphics are amazing (I watched it in IMAX), although the eagles look too computer-generated, as well as the hedgehogs and squirrels, haha. But I think it's still the case everywhere. They can't draw a truly realistic animal yet. Probably because in reality, there are no squirrels pulling sleds, or smart eagles knocking orcs off their feet and grabbing hobbits with their claws. I don't know why Amko called the film mediocre. Maybe I'm just a big Tolkien fan. But in general, the film is really 6+, kids would like it, and adults too. As with the book.
In short, "The Hobbit" is neither better nor worse than the Lord of the Rings trilogy.
I just don't understand how they're going to make a trilogy. In the first part, more than half of the book has already passed, it seems to me.
By the way, there was a very good fight in the goblin caves. Tolkien didn't focus on this, because the story was about Bilbo, and in general, it seems that there was no battle at all. So Peter Jackson took advantage of this and added his own creativity. The battle turned out in the style of Pirates of the Caribbean.
I just don't understand how they're going to make a trilogy. More than half of the book is already covered in the first part, it seems to me.
Jackson is going to take moments from other books by Tolkien. For example, the backstory of the Necromancer/Sauron (which doesn't make sense, since the Necromancer was only indirectly mentioned in The Hobbit).
Another terrible oversight is the lack of blood on the weapons. You stab an Orc, and the sword just sparkles and shines. Do they really need that 6+ rating so badly?
Because it's a fairy tale for children, among other things included in the early school curriculum, and not a hardcore action game for teenagers?
He couldn't wait until tomorrow.
Orandor in general...
I was expressing my opinion.
Watched 5 seasons of "Everybody Hates Chris." It's actually pretty good.
Okay, don't delete it.
Все псы попадают в рай
Какие бы законы мы не писали, нас все равно расстреляют, если мы проиграем эту войну.
But it is absolutely true that this is a fairy tale for children. The film conveyed the fairy tale well, and I think six-year-old children would enjoy and find it interesting to watch. Although there is a lot of violence for a fairy tale (and for "The Hobbit," I think the violence was only at the end).