Auto-translated
I like it! It's like experience... they build and build, and finally, super-mega builders erect an obelisk. :D
Night
Posts from Town Points – Is development becoming too formulaic?
Open
What do you think about Town Points?
60
voters
Single choice
Sign in to participate in this poll.
Poll results will be visible after you vote or when the poll closes.
Vlad
Auto-translated
Or is it the physical strength of the builders: who will build the obelisk after building the Stronghold?:)
Night
Auto-translated
What's there to worry about? It's just a new feature; people will get used to it in a couple of months and won't be able to live without it anymore:)
Varg-Nar
Auto-translated
Imagine, guys, what if you could buy points on the market? Of course, for money, not for resources. The game would be much more enjoyable knowing that your opponent is behind, unless they bought even more points.
Night
Auto-translated
Hey guys, what if you could buy points on the market? Of course, for money, not for resources. It would make the game much more enjoyable, knowing that your opponent is behind, unless they bought even more points. ;)
Magnus
Auto-translated
Bought a bunch of points, but now I don't have enough gold to build a structure :) In the end, you have a ton of these points, but you're broke, while the enemy develops peacefully (or sits there just like you :)). Don't corner the game!:)
Varg-Nar
Auto-translated
Message from Night
I bought points, but there's no gold left to build a structure. As a result, you have a ton of these points, but you're broke, while the enemy develops peacefully (or sits there just like you). Don't push the game into a corner!
hobo
Auto-translated
I definitely don't like this system! They've cut down on this aspect of the game.
Night
Auto-translated
I definitely don't like this system! They cut down on this game component. :(
hobo
Auto-translated
As I understand it, the topic is about city development. It seems they made it as monotonous as possible. Previously (for example, in Heroes 3), there was a choice of whether to develop the economy first, or immediately focus on troops, or do both.
But now, as I understand it, this has been reduced, and you can only develop in one way. Or am I misunderstanding something?
But now, as I understand it, this has been reduced, and you can only develop in one way. Or am I misunderstanding something?
Night
Auto-translated
As I understand it, the topic is about city development. It seems they made it as monotonous as possible. Previously (for example, in Heroes 3), there was a choice of whether to develop the economy first, or immediately focus on troops, or do both.
But now, as I understand it, this has been reduced, and you can only develop in one way. Or am I misunderstanding something?
hobo
Auto-translated
Why just one? You develop however you want:)
Perhaps my understanding, formed from reading some posts, is fundamentally incorrect. And I won't argue until I play it.
But for now, my opinion hasn't changed, because I haven't seen any development paths in the fifth game, even according to other people. Therefore, I will continue to consider the introduction of these points as a reduction.
Vlad
Auto-translated
No points, no problems. :) ;) I don't understand this new feature. We lived without it, and we played happily from Heroes 1 to Heroes 4 ;) :) (inclusive);) :) ;) :)
Pearl
Auto-translated
I haven't formed an opinion on this yet. I'll play it first, and then I'll share my thoughts.
Vlad
Auto-translated
I don't have any thoughts on this yet. I'll play it first, and then I'll form my own opinion.
I think you'll decide soon.:D
Statistics
Welcome our newest member:
recijeb