Posts from [2x2 Tournament] Resurrection

What nonsense, Kostik – you’ve been at sea for too long! How do you imagine a +300 limit when time is running out in battle? You made me laugh!

Actually, it's optional. In this tournament, the time in battle will be tracked. Otherwise, we won't be able to meet the deadlines.

There's not enough time to do even the simplest tasks. :(

Too much time! There's enough time for chain quests and simple battles, but serious ones will probably be only in the future builds.

Did Volgograd surrender without a fight? I hope they reconsider and make it 1000+400.

Not enough time to do even the simplest tasks. :(

I'll repeat it again. This isn't an XL Jebus with strong monsters, but an L with weak ones. All the battles there are elementary, and there's enough time for chain turns. Just try playing a fun game with these settings. There's more than enough time. Redwhite played by these rules and understands what I'm talking about.

Understand. If the game is played with a standard SOD timer, even at 4 minutes, considering the battles, the turn time will be 10 minutes or more. In addition, allies will often get stuck in battle to discuss some nuances with each other. As a result, there will be 1 turn per hour :)

Added 6 minutes later

Hopefully, they'll think about it and make it 1000+400.

Let's discuss this point. In theory, it's the same in terms of time. What other options are there?

just out of curiosity, how long would it take to max out a Dwarf, let's say, in the Swamp area?

600 - 700

so what's the argument about here – it's not clear))

So, it's unclear what the argument is about.

I don't understand it either. As they say, time is money; when you see money, don't waste time. :)
Here, you need to decide what's more important to you: time or money (and there's plenty of it). In one game, I gave Diman 60k gold on level 117. In another game, on level 114, I took a Utopia, while on level 117, the parameters were around 30. For 2 months, no one will be playing. Therefore, there's too much time, and it's not necessary.

Leave the timer as it is, but disable the time limit in battles; it's not a big deal.

Regarding a more detailed opinion, I'll get back to you tomorrow; I'm swamped with work today.

I'm participating: Sod, 4 minutes, and either Maretti, ATG, or Oelma as a teammate, if nothing else works, ^^

4 minutes with Sod and Oelm, and it will be the worst ending in human history :D

Well… okay, I’m a noob, I hope for now. I consider the time limit luxurious for L-U on Jebus where there’s a sea of (I calculated this for strong monsters, not understanding how you can break through the guard to the center on week 1), and for weak monsters, it’s generally splendid time-wise. This is a rush game, i.e., you shouldn’t count on fattening up. Or if you want to play wearing a tuxedo and pouring a glass of whiskey for yourself and your girlfriend on your knee, then you need a limit of 10000+1800 and all participants should take a six-month leave for the tournament. Apologies for the sarcasm, of course. I played a fun game 2v2 in spring… nub_hmm streamed on sc2tv, there’s a video in his vod — it’s just terrible time-wise (we swore then not to play 2v2 again, at the earliest not before half a year to a year), even though the template was specifically for 2v2, but that’s for fun games; thank goodness the connection was normal and there were no restarts I think… Two sessions of 7 hours each, definitely no time, I’m writing from work.

Added after 38 minutes

I don’t get it either. As they say, time is money — when you see money, don’t waste time :)
You’ll need to decide what’s more important to you: time or money (of which there’s already a sea). In one game, I transferred 60k gold to Diman on day 117. In another game, on day 114 I took a Dragon Utopia, and by day 117 my stats were around 30. No one will play until month 2. So there’s way too much time.

Rewrite the first post with clear points for the particularly gifted, because ideas are coming up that could be implemented in a good dozen other tournaments. Host a tournament; you set the start, set a deadline for applications, draws, etc., everything necessary. Whoever signed up, signed up, and if they agree, they accept the rules. And play the tournament with any number of participants. Let the others then kick themselves and argue somewhere in the break room. A tournament is, as they say, a collective affair — if you want to participate, do; if not, don’t (whether they’ll take you or not… that’s a second issue, for later). Whoever designs the tournament takes some foundation and then develops it — let’s respect those people and the time they spend on it. Whoever has ideas (there are many in this topic, though there are somehow few tournaments) can finalize them; details will be sorted out later (but only details — the idea must not be broken), and — suggest your own new tournament in a new thread!!!!
........
I consider pairing by registration very biased. IMHO: let the organizers make the pairs by drawing based on the principle of a “strong” and “weak” pair or “medium” and “medium”, using data from the overall HeroesWorld rating after final registration of participants. I.e., the organizers create 4 baskets. Two for medium rating and one each for participants with low and high rating; for newbie noobs like me, count the rating as low, or at the organizers’ discretion. Then at stage 1 of the draw, create pairs; at stage 2… dunno… you could make groups of pairs, or I won’t get into guessing so as not to break the idea.
…
I’d like to play in some sort of 3-player tournament, but I only get lucky in 5-player ones, where I play even worse (((, but I haven’t decided yet; I don’t know the exact rules, the version of HotA, or how hard it will be to install. In TE, I played with a time limit — whether that’s the same or not, I didn’t look into it. So for now, I’m thinking.

...because new ideas have emerged that can be implemented in a dozen different Tournaments...

don't worry) the version, settings, and time will remain unchanged even if only 1 pair of participants registers - then we will simply play for the medal in the final ;) as they say, you can't please everyone.

...I think registering in pairs is very unfair...

well, there is not much objectivity in Heroes in general) the Tournament is for fun, and its main task is to provide a pleasant time for the players, and a partner influences this more than anyone else) I think it is much more logical to leave all registered pairs as they are, and we will somehow unite those who have not found a partner according to the principle of universal justice ;)

Added 18 minutes later

...I don't know exactly the regulations, the version of Warlords, how difficult it will be to install...

I can help with this

I want to play in a Heroes III tournament, but I only get lucky in Heroes V, where I play even worse(((

A "newbie" tournament will be held soon, get ready (practice with fun maps), you can play there.