Posts from Mafia 54. This is where caravans are robbed! Auto-translated

So, the description of the lich suggests it's similar to a non-disclosure agreement for smuggling, but it belonged to Sab. Yesterday, another caravan or a maniac visited him, using a non-disclosure agreement on him. After that, he stole Sab's non-disclosure agreement and used it today, meaning the maniac didn't kill anyone for two days but instead used non-disclosure agreements on caravans. Because one caravan couldn't rob another caravan, and the maniac simply repeatedly used another non-disclosure agreement on a caravan.

The villain would have been mentioned in the newspaper if he hadn't gone out to kill today. Or am I missing something?

As I understand it, the mage's attack was unsuccessful, the defense was triggered, so there's nothing in the newspaper.

Exactly! The maniac went to kill Nera, but instead used Sab's artifact, which the maniac stole the previous night after visiting him with a caravan carrying food:

Sub Zero also feasted, but nothing noteworthy happened to him, and he didn't have any interesting guests. However, he ate so much that he almost felt sick afterward.

Some loser maniac walks out.

Zubr, I think, was probably a caravan carrying weapons. It's unlikely that the Mafia wouldn't have written a note from the caravan, and there was only one. Although, a real caravan could have missed it, and then Zubr was most likely the fourth (and the note about wine is also a fake).

To avoid any misunderstandings, I have slightly revised the rules in the first post. I apologize again for my idiocy when I write one thing but follow another.

Drakkosha
And what exactly did you fix?

I had written that "kills are not displayed if natural defense is triggered," but in reality, I wasn't displaying any unsuccessful kills.

but it was a mistake. they should have defended.

What do you expect from a silly woman?
I already know that I messed up everywhere I could, but I'll try not to be so clueless at least until the end of this game

I believe that Evil no longer exists in this world and vanished on the very first day.

The version with a series of robberies sounds more convincing.

I wouldn't call it a version; rather, I'm stating an undeniable truth.

Funny. Evil didn't kill anyone in 4 turns, but still hasn't been revealed in the newspaper. I don't even know if I should call it luck or not :).

Hmm, you know, that's actually possible. Look, yesterday there were two caravans with food, but one of them could have belonged not to Manu, but to anyone else who robbed that caravan on the second night when the path wasn't visible. Similarly, today's "caravan with contraband" could have belonged to the same role that Saba had yesterday, and the real caravan with food was with Ara then and could safely come to me today. It's just crazy).