Skip to content

Posts from Sacred Haven of Debauchery Auto-translated

4.3 (23 ratings)
Closed
What shall we name the establishment?
28 voters
Single choice Public votes
This poll is closed.
“Flooding.” Simple and effective
17.9% 5 votes
Leave it as is – “Fludnyak”
7.1% 2 votes
“A den of debauchery.” How original!
39.3% 11 votes
Brewery
17.9% 5 votes
Another option (specify in the subject line)
17.9% 5 votes
User Avatar
#50613
Auto-translated
No, how did you find out that Oxygen was the culprit?
User Avatar
#50614
Auto-translated
Regarding the database. Otherwise, I wouldn't have known. You can check the proof in the "changes and suggestions" section.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения!
И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день



User Avatar
#50615
Auto-translated
Quote:
So, you got banned for no reason?

yes
You came back from your ban too early, considering you think it was undeserved.
You should have stayed there longer.


Барон
"Vampires"

Отдай свои прошлые сны,
В сомненьях себя обрети,
В бешеном танце душа кружится!
Не думай, что будет потом,
Здесь и сейчас мы живем,
Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!



User Avatar
#50616
Auto-translated
Morti, but that message does contain an insult. An indirect one. It warrants twenty-five points.
User Avatar
#50617
Auto-translated
All 4 violations regarding the case are listed there. The presence of such a large number of "-BD" is a bit confusing, but it's a minor issue and not technically related to the violations.


Барон
"Vampires"

Отдай свои прошлые сны,
В сомненьях себя обрети,
В бешеном танце душа кружится!
Не думай, что будет потом,
Здесь и сейчас мы живем,
Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!



#50618
Auto-translated
And the fact that the points were awarded by a moderator from another section is also not a big deal.
User Avatar
#50620
Auto-translated
Flema isn't there.
25 points for the first "insult" – unfair. Because there isn't an insult there. In other words, there is one formally, but I would adhere to the logic that Major Whirlwind described a long time ago – to ask the opinion of the potential "offended party" whether such words are offensive to them. I don't think that Amko takes those words from Mortulus seriously as an insult, just as I don't think that Sat had the motivation to offend Amaranta.
So, out of those four violations, only one is justified.

Added 2 minutes later
By the way, he also received half a point for "flooding" for no reason.
User Avatar
#50621
Auto-translated
Is flooding allowed in the flooding section?

Be strong. Believe
User Avatar
#50622
Auto-translated
No.

Added 31 seconds ago
But someone, at some point, received points for flooding in a flood thread. It seems like it was me.

Added 4 minutes ago
Lol, yes. Two of the later messages contain flood content - in the flood thread.
And the first two don't contain any flood content at all.
User Avatar
#50624
Auto-translated
And off-topic posts are also allowed in the general chat. What the heck.
This is Arandor!!1 I'm sure.

Added after 40 seconds
A clear theme, yes. Strict boundaries for any theme.
User Avatar
#50626
Auto-translated
You should all have been banned a long time ago.

Be strong. Believe
User Avatar
#50627
Auto-translated
And also, the admin banned me from the forum out of REVENGE or ANGER because I called him a sheep.

Added after 57 seconds
Flaming is allowed, but Morti wasn't flaming.