I'm trying to defeat Xiedu and I've encountered an interesting feature. It's either a bug in the game or a bug in the map. Basically, Sir Mullich doesn't gain skills when leveling up, starting from a certain level. At the same time, there are 3 empty slots. What the heck is going on?
Posts from The most challenging maps for you.
Auto-translated
I played the third game manually for the first time.
(Василь Симоненко. Люди – прекрасні)
if a stack controlled by the AI, under the Berserk effect, cannot reach the nearest unit, it will indeed simply skip turns until the spell effect wears off or is removed (see the same FizMig).
How can a stack fail to reach the nearest enemy if a Berserk unit is forced to attack the nearest one? Is it due to the force field or something else? Especially considering it's a flying stack.
Справочник по НоММ-4 http://handbookhmm.ru/pamyatka-dlya-heroes-iv.html
Памятка по НоММ-3 http://handbookhmm.ru/pamyatka-dlya-homm-iii.html
и HotA http://handbookhmm.ru/vyishla-obnovlennaya-pamyatka-dlya-homm-iii-hota.html
Give me some advice on which race is best to play this scenario with? And what are the intricacies of manual combat? I only know about Necromancers so far, that skeletons give you rewards after a battle.
Regarding auto-combat; it’s strange that no one else responded; I would like to know what dnaop-wr thinks about this?! :)
And why bother with manual combat if time is so precious? There's an easier way: press Tab and type nwcredpill. And that's it! :D
quick battles are no longer interesting
Or maybe this is just thick trolling (and I fell for it)?..
However, the person who wrote this has such high morale - I wonder how they achieved it?
(Василь Симоненко. Люди – прекрасні)
Regarding autobattle; it's strange that no one else responded; I'd like to know what dnaop-wr's horse thinks about it?! :)
However, the person who wrote this has such high morale - I wonder how they achieved it?
Autobattle should probably be turned on when your hand gets tired. Or change hands. As Mayakovsky wrote, "Who's playing with their right hand? - with their left! left! left!"
Although, to be fair, there were times when, half-asleep, I accidentally clicked on autobattle - and sometimes the result was no worse than in manual combat. But only sometimes.
And regarding the birds :smile24: the question is interesting. Maybe they reproduce on their own? Judging by the number of birds, on average, one bird appeared per post. This means that in the last posts about autobattle, birds should also appear. For example, the creator of "PhysMig," AmberSoler, which everyone uses, has far fewer birds.:confused:
Справочник по НоММ-4 http://handbookhmm.ru/pamyatka-dlya-heroes-iv.html
Памятка по НоММ-3 http://handbookhmm.ru/pamyatka-dlya-homm-iii.html
и HotA http://handbookhmm.ru/vyishla-obnovlennaya-pamyatka-dlya-homm-iii-hota.html
"Heroes 3" and "Heroes 6" are very different games! Personally, after reading reviews about the 6th installment, I didn't want to spend money on a new video card and extra memory to play this "masterpiece": in my opinion, only the horns and hooves of a strategy remained. :( Well, this was already discussed in detail before the release of "Heroes 6".
Perhaps I expressed myself too harshly, but believe me: it's worth learning to play "Heroes 3" well - and you won't want to play other versions anymore! I, for example, rarely want to play other games. :)
By the way, did you know that in the single-player game in "Heroes 3," the timer is not used by default, and the player's turn time is not limited!
Yes, and I also wanted to note one feature of the auto-battle (I read about this somewhere a long time ago): most often, its results are better than in a "manual" battle for a human player. Moreover: they wrote that it is not possible to achieve such results even for the strongest players; usually, the losses are noticeably greater. The conclusion was that the calculation algorithm in the auto-battle is imperfect and does not take into account all the nuances - hence the difference. Therefore, the auto-battle (if we don't count "clearing" small neutrals to save time) can, in a sense, be almost equated to cheating. But I think that with experience, you will always prefer to fight enemies yourself. And win! Good luck to you on the battlefields!
(Василь Симоненко. Люди – прекрасні)
Yes, and I also wanted to note one feature of the auto-battle (I read about it somewhere): most often, its results are better than in a "manual" battle for a human player. Moreover, it was written that even the strongest players cannot achieve such results; usually, the losses are noticeably greater. The conclusion was that the auto-battle calculation algorithm is imperfect and does not take into account all the nuances - hence the difference. Therefore, the auto-battle (if we don't count "clearing" small neutrals to save time) can, in a sense, be almost equated to cheating. But I think that with experience, you will always prefer to fight enemies yourself. And win! Good luck on the battlefields!
But in the vast majority of cases, somewhere around 99.9%, you will fight manually, at least as well as, or better than, a quick battle or auto-battle, because you are simply smarter than the stupid hero AI.
That one time was special: the author of the map "Jedi story" wrote that one location can only be passed using autobattle: the hero simply walks on water, and neutral creatures stand in his way; without autobattle, the game simply "crashes" in this location, because, according to the game's logic, a battle always takes place either on some kind of terrain or on the deck of a ship, but there is water, and the hero doesn't swim, but walks on the water.
If anyone has more accurate information about autobattle or can provide a link to it, I would be grateful.
And I completely agree with your opinion about the "stupid hero AI" and your distrust of it.
(Василь Симоненко. Люди – прекрасні)
Juristis, I don't want to get into an argument; this has been written about in detail, but I can't remember the source right now and won't provide a link. All complaints should be directed to the author of that material, not to me, because I personally did not verify this information. Moreover: except for one time, I have never used autobattle at all.
And that one time was special: the author of the map "Jedi story" wrote that one place can only be passed using autobattle: it's just that there the hero walks on water, and neutral creatures stand in his way; without autobattle, the game simply "crashes" in this place, because, according to the game logic, combat always takes place either on some kind of ground or on the deck of a ship, but there is water, and the hero does not swim, but walks on the water.
If anyone has more accurate information about autobattle or provides a link to it, I will be grateful.
But I completely agree with your opinion regarding the "stupid heroic AI" and distrusting it.
Yes, I didn't write this to start an argument, I just didn't want Chingis to be mistaken about the results of using auto-battle and quick-battle.
Perhaps I read about autobattle in that thread. Here it is:
It has already been discussed many times! I discussed this topic with many authoritative players via ICQ. No one understands the nature of quick battles, so players share their observations.
(Василь Симоненко. Люди – прекрасні)
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того