New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
Nice! Want a quick tour of this page too?
Show the author's original text and human translations first. Machine translation is used only when nothing else exists.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
Dgak
Zybr
That's exactly right. If someone says they are a Druid, and they aren't modkilled, then they are lying. If someone says they are Gollum, and they aren't modkilled, then they are lying.
Ment
Siverfale
Zybr
Jack simply changed the rules; you can check it out, Zubr; they are a little different with him. Usually, of course, you can't even lie like that.
Dgak
Yeah Jac, I already wrote about this in the thread about your mafia, but Zubr is completely right here. You made a total mess.
Ugh Jac, we were all expecting a great game from you, the likes of which HeroesWorld has never seen, and you let us all down like that.
Драккошка
Ment
It is forbidden to reveal your own/another player's role, or its elements, as well as any information obtained about them, in public places or among players who are not in the same group as you. The same applies to information about other players. Phrases like "well, I also know something about him that I can't say" are a violation, regardless of whether you actually know something or are lying. Statements like "I checked," "according to my information, which I cannot disclose," "I know for sure," etc., are prohibited.
...or are lying.
Драккошка
Zybr
Ment
Dgak
Ment
Dgak
Рудый
Jack, yes. It is quite possible that "Sauron's ultimate ability bypasses everything," but why isn't this mentioned in the rules? The rules state the following: Sauron has a special ability called "Rod of Darkness," which allows him to ignore any protection. In the game "Mafia," protection refers to a player's inherent ability (role) to prevent negative actions or a "protection" action directed at that player by another player. A "protection" action can be of the following types:
1) The player using this action dies instead of the player targeted by the action.
2) Instead of the player targeted by the action, the attacker dies.
3) The negative action simply does not take effect.
Please add to the list if I missed something or correct me if I made a mistake.
There are other types of actions. For example: block, kill, HEAL, etc. So, block is not the same as protection, kill is not the same as protection, and healing is not the same as protection. Therefore, the healing action that the Ancient used tonight should have worked.
Jack, because of your mistake, the outcome of the game is being affected. In this case, it's the town. Of course, the town can still win. But if it weren't for your mistake, Frodo would be alive, and Sauron would be dead. You are personally depriving me of victory, judging by the votes against me right now. If the healing action that SHOULD HAVE WORKED had worked, Sauron would have died, and everyone would have understood that it wasn't me. Why are you depriving me of the opportunity to play a great game because of your mistake? Or do you think it's easy to figure out who was Frodo? The Ancient made a move that gave the town the best chance. And you, by changing the rules retroactively (?), or interpreting them as you see fit, are depriving the town of its best chance of winning.
Sincerely,
Gur
