Posts from Mafia 44. Time of Troubles Auto-translated

I'm just trying to consider all possible scenarios. And Hermit, with his passive Eternal NNV-Gur style, resembles a werewolf, plus I liked Nebok as a justification, although his nonsense about birds deserves to be hanged. And what difference does it make? The werewolf is doing a good job and is playing for the town; the mafia is the danger.

Day Results

Execute Neyru Drake -- 1 (Hermit)
Execute NNV -- 11 (Zybr, Winner, Lynx, Dgak, Xostor, WishmasteR, Rudy, Ple-Sen, Goomer, Nebo, WhiteLizard)
Several questions were on the agenda: who was Amko, who killed him, who is the foreign spy, and are there any foreign spies in the town at all? Without definitively resolving all the questions, the townspeople simply caught some pig, executed him, and had dinner.
No one was executed; the second night begins.

Preliminary voting results:
Execute Neyru - 4 votes (Lord Mortulus, Wishmaster, Plesen, Hermit)
Nebo - 3 votes (Arandor, Winner, Zybr)
Revana - 1 vote (Xostor)
NNV - 2 votes (Vistrit, Spir)
10 votes are needed for execution.
let it be, important conclusions can be drawn from this. Need to delete - let me know.

Oh, Dgak, you seem a bit suspicious to me... maybe even a werewolf, but I don't have any proof yet.

Hermit, assign players to roles.

but it seems to me that Dgak is definitely negative, and if he's not a werewolf, then maybe they're in the same mafia with Rudai.

Hermit, you're acting a bit strangely, I don't understand you.

Hermit, you just didn't understand my role.

Doesn't Dgak seem to be acting strangely? Do you understand him? Regarding Red, it's just a guess, and I also suspect Jack, but only based on his behavior. But I have a feeling that Jack is a negative influence, and if he's not a werewolf, then Red might also turn out to be a negative influence, but I only have a slight suspicion about Red.

What conclusions can be drawn about Jaku? As for Vistrit, rereading the newspapers, you can understand something. But you, Hermit, appeared in the game topic relatively recently and are trying to prove something to someone when the game is almost over.
I admit that anyone can be negative, but something more is needed than just self-confidence or an assumption. For example, evidence, or just silly behavior psychology, like, say, Revan's.

And yes, you are simply wasting your vote, it's stupid.