Posts from New Haven

Well... I'll also try to log in every other day and leave a vote; it's a great game, right? (or however many times he logged in, I don't personally see him in the thread at all).

There's no point in changing the meaning; no one will reread the thread, so it will be as useless as with those offline players.

If you can't see it, doesn't mean it's not there.

That's not necessarily true. Tell me, why are you against replacing inactive units? Are you afraid that they might suddenly become active?

This is a nuisance for half of the players.

Well, that's just great, now let's all send private messages to each other, and discussions will go nowhere, really, who needs that?

I'm ready to execute Pandora or Zybr.
If needed.

Why are you so nervous, getting worked up about inactive players, and focusing on just one target when there are at least three?
If it weren't for the "check," I would think you were Mafia. It's not the best tactic for a town member when there's a chance to identify all three bandits based on the voting results and interactions.

I'm ready to execute Pandora or Zybr.
Just in case.

If I express my opinion in a blunt way, it doesn't mean I'm nervous.
Do you think everyone who's inactive is Mafia? Or what?

Why them in particular?
What can you say, for example, about Rimpel?

Well-reasoned arguments. As always.