Skip to content

Posts from philosophy

3.7 (3 ratings)
User Avatar
#835
Auto-translated
Faith is inherent in human nature; therefore, regardless of the views one holds, it represents their fundamental belief system (religion, atheism, philosophy – it doesn't matter). Humans seek spiritual support for their existence, a justification for their being, as they need motivation to live. At the core of it all lies the fear of death, the fear of the unknown that awaits us THERE. To be or not to be, that is the question; Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles And by opposing end them. To die—to sleep, No more; and by a sleep to say we end The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks That flesh is heir to: 'tis a consummation Devoutly to be wish'd. To die, to sleep; To sleep, perchance to dream—ay, there's the rub: For in that sleep of death what dreams may come, When we have shuffled off this mortal coil, Must give us pause—there's the respect That makes calamity of so long life. For who would bear the whips and scorns of time, Th' oppressor's wrong, the proud man's contumely, The pangs of despis'd love, the law's delay, The insolence of office, and the spurns That patient merit of th' unworthy takes, When he himself might his quietus make With a bare bodkin? Who would fardels bear, To grunt and sweat under a weary life, But that the dread of something after death, The undiscover'd country from whose bourn No traveller returns, puzzles the will, And makes us rather bear those ills we have Than fly to others that we know not of? Thus conscience does make cowards of us all, And thus the native hue of resolution Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought, And enterprises of great pith and moment With this regard their currents turn awry, And lose the name of action.— Shakespeare, "Hamlet" Act III, Scene 1
Настоящие герои - не те, пред кем мы преклоняемся, а те, кого мы оплевываем...[/COLOR]
-----------------------------
"So much has gone
and little is new"

David Bowie
User Avatar
#836
Auto-translated
Silvanis, it seems we finally agree on something! I agree with your latest posts. Wiz, after all, hell is what I know, the idea of God (he cast the devil into the already prepared hell), but it's not very cruel because Hitler or Chikatilo are not worthy of Christian forgiveness.
User Avatar
#837
Auto-translated
I started reading a book about Marxism. It's an amazing thing, a real masterpiece. I understood two things from the very first pages. First: liberals don't like Marxism because Marx talked about historical determinism, i.e., everything that has a beginning also has an end. Therefore, capitalism cannot be eternal in principle. Second: our current education reform was specifically designed to ensure that a country living solely on raw material exports doesn't need such highly qualified specialists as it did in the USSR. We have too many educated people, and there shouldn't be so many in a colony. That's it, I'm joining the Marxists.
Мы спасемся? Я не знаю. Верьте...
Геройский Интернационал
Клан Homo homini - основатель клана
Член РКСМ с 07.07.07.
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ!- сообщить о бесполезной теме/сообщении.
In reply to AlexeyPank
User Avatar
#838
Auto-translated
AlexeyPank;54399
Okay, I'm switching to Marxism.
:) Good luck! :)

P.S. - They actually have a lot of good ideas... Marx is my second most respected philosopher (after Nietzsche); I respect them (Marx and Nietzsche) primarily not for their position, but for their rationality and consistency.
P.P.S. - I'm actually an anarchist-idealist, i.e., I believe that in an ideal society, the state is unnecessary, but in a realistic sense, I lean towards socialism in many ways... but WITHOUT IDEOLOGICAL PRESSURE!:mad:
С Пути сбивают мелкие достижения, а изощрённые суждения скрывают смысл слов. И вот уже возникают "правильное" и "неправильное"...
- Чжуан-цзы
Сильванис
User Avatar
#839
Auto-translated
As for me, the most accurate definition would be national-bolshevik. But not the one associated with Limonov, but rather the one who follows Ustryalov. Anarchism is also a very interesting ideology, but it is difficult to implement. Although Bakunin and Kropotkin are very appealing to me. Bakunin's idea of self-governing communities is one of the best social transformations that can be proposed. In principle, the Soviets in the USSR were conceived according to this very principle.
P.S. I have always had a good opinion of Marx, but now I want to get his complete works.
Мы спасемся? Я не знаю. Верьте...
Геройский Интернационал
Клан Homo homini - основатель клана
Член РКСМ с 07.07.07.
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ!- сообщить о бесполезной теме/сообщении.
In reply to AlexeyPank
User Avatar
#840
Auto-translated
AlexeyPank;54416
Anarchism is also a very interesting ideology, but it is difficult to implement.
That's why I say I'm an anarchist idealist :) I believe that at least now establishing anarchy would simply lead to a collapse - first, we would live in a world like Fallout for about a hundred years (only without nuclear war; or maybe with it), and then states would form again...
С Пути сбивают мелкие достижения, а изощрённые суждения скрывают смысл слов. И вот уже возникают "правильное" и "неправильное"...
- Чжуан-цзы
Сильванис
User Avatar
#841
Auto-translated
Anarchy can be achieved through socialism and communism, when the state withers away on its own. The question is, how long will we have to wait for that...
Oh, if only socialism would come sooner, I'm tired of working for peanuts.
Мы спасемся? Я не знаю. Верьте...
Геройский Интернационал
Клан Homo homini - основатель клана
Член РКСМ с 07.07.07.
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ!- сообщить о бесполезной теме/сообщении.
In reply to AlexeyPank
User Avatar
#842
Auto-translated
Let’s bring back the USSR then! :D :D :D
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ - конец бесполезным темам
User Avatar
#843
Auto-translated
The USSR cannot be brought back. It was destroyed, and you cannot revive the dead. We need to create a new, Eurasian Soviet Federated Empire, based on the principles of Soviets – bodies of power elected according to the production-territorial principle – and a federation.
Мы спасемся? Я не знаю. Верьте...
Геройский Интернационал
Клан Homo homini - основатель клана
Член РКСМ с 07.07.07.
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ!- сообщить о бесполезной теме/сообщении.
In reply to AlexeyPank
User Avatar
#844
Auto-translated
When I fantasize about a military strategy game, I always want to combine the former USSR with Europe. The result is the USSR 2.0: New Union of Free Socialist Republics. :D
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ - конец бесполезным темам
User Avatar
#845
Auto-translated
Europe won't come to us, and we don't need it. We can unite Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Belarus, and Mongolia. Move the capital to Astana. And perhaps, Russia will be saved.
Мы спасемся? Я не знаю. Верьте...
Геройский Интернационал
Клан Homo homini - основатель клана
Член РКСМ с 07.07.07.
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ!- сообщить о бесполезной теме/сообщении.
In reply to AlexeyPank
User Avatar
#846
Auto-translated
And don't forget about China! Russians and Chinese are brothers forever (Zadornov). :D
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ - конец бесполезным темам
In reply to AlexeyPank
User Avatar
#847
Auto-translated
AlexeyPank;54436
Europe won't join us, and we don't need it. We can unite Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Belarus, and Mongolia. Move the capital to Astana. And perhaps Russia will be saved.
I'm not sure. No one will want to unite. The countries are already not rich, and uniting will only ruin them.
And where does this idea come from – that the more, the better?:confused:
User Avatar
#848
Auto-translated
You say they're not wealthy? Well, we'll see. Dying separately might be a pleasant experience, but surviving... Unification under Russia will destroy them. However, forming a union based on an equal federation will save them.
Мы спасемся? Я не знаю. Верьте...
Геройский Интернационал
Клан Homo homini - основатель клана
Член РКСМ с 07.07.07.
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ!- сообщить о бесполезной теме/сообщении.
In reply to Night
User Avatar
#849
Auto-translated
Night;54439
Not sure. No one will want to unite.
Yes, that's true.
Night;54439
And where does this opinion come from – that the more, the better?:confused:
And it's not even an opinion; the USSR was a single state with a single economy, and different territorial regions specialized in different things; the collapse of the USSR severely damaged this economic system, and its restoration (hypothetically) could help...
But in my opinion, this is not the solution.
С Пути сбивают мелкие достижения, а изощрённые суждения скрывают смысл слов. И вот уже возникают "правильное" и "неправильное"...
- Чжуан-цзы
Сильванис

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: Emil