Skip to content

Posts from Quick battle.

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Open
Do you use auto-combat?
79 voters
Single choice
Sign in to participate in this poll.
Poll results will be visible after you vote or when the poll closes.
14 years ago
Auto-translated
There is experience gained in Dynasty mode, where you receive gold, platinum, etc. In quick battles, experience is only gained by the hero and does not transfer to Dynasty mode.
In reply to Chingis
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Starting with Heroes 3, I only use quick battles. Because I'm too lazy to learn the magic for each series of Heroes, and I don't want to bother with corpses. IMHO
Besides, the computer does a good job in the battles, it's quite entertaining. And I've played many scenarios in all the Heroes series on the "impossible" difficulty level, with 200% bonuses, etc. :) IMHO

Added 1 minute ago
Devolik
There's experience in the dynasty. Where you get gold, platinum, etc.
In quick battles, experience only goes to the hero, it doesn't go to the dynasty.
Please explain further? So, if experience goes to the dynasty, is it used by other heroes in the dynasty? In short, what does dynasty experience give?
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Please explain further. So, if experience is passed down within a dynasty, does it benefit other heroes in that dynasty? In short, what does dynasty experience provide?
Yes, it's about the rating. It's to show the world how well you completed the campaign.
14 years ago
Auto-translated
A week ago, I reached level 40 for my dynasty. Now I don't have to worry about autobattles or replay battles manually anymore. :)
I quickly reached the maximum level; I've completed all 4 campaigns, and there's nowhere else to go.
14 years ago
Auto-translated
I'm using the auto-battle feature because I don't want to waste time on "uninteresting" battles, as the time I have for the game is limited.
In reply to SirRolandOrlando
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Yesterday, I played the "Shattered Alliance" battle on a medium difficulty level against average AI opponents. I wanted to control the battle manually, but it turned out that I had to use "quick battle" again. Because when I played this battle on "normal" difficulty, I leveled up a mage to level 30, and I fought minor battles in quick battle mode, thinking I would "catch" a strong opponent and enjoy a magical show, but they kept running away from the battlefield. I got "angry" and switched back to quick battle! Quick battle is the best battle of all battles!!!
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
The best battle is the one that never happened :). But still, it's not that interesting. To develop a hero to level 30 and never try playing with them in a battle... Isn't that boring?
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Winner
Level a hero to 30 and never try playing them in a battle... Isn't that boring?

I completely agree with Winner. What's the point of playing then?


I don't play quick battles. In the third game, I often practiced it because the maps were so slow-paced.
In the sixth game, every battle, every faction, every unit is something new and exciting.
If I play online, it's exclusively with friends. I don't play with strangers and I don't plan to... just in case I don't waste their precious time. ;)
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
I don’t play with auto-battle either. It’s not interesting…
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
I don’t play auto-battle. It’s better to improve my gameplay skills.
14 years ago
Auto-translated
By the way, in the fifth and sixth installments, there's a convenient auto-battle feature. I use it for uninteresting battles against weak neutral creatures, or when I want to finish a battle without any losses.

When I'm playing single-player now, if I see that there's going to be a lot of auto-battling, it means my interest is waning, so I pause and finish the game later.
14 years ago
Auto-translated
The downside of quick battles is the inefficient use of mana and the failure to utilize the special effects of dynasty weapons. Mana is the main problem; several times, a lot of mana was spent in quick battles, and it wasn't enough for a fight with a serious opponent. I decided to replay a quick battle in auto-battle mode to understand where the mana is being spent. I had a large Necropolis army, and the neutral creatures were Berserkers, with a low threat level. The Berserkers couldn't even theoretically reach my troops; they were simply shot down by spiders, liches, and skeletons. But the AI, first of all, cast Mass Drain, which consumed forty units of mana – there was no point in doing that.
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Well, of course, I control the mana during auto-battles. If I'm playing as a Barbarian, I try not to take any spells at all, only the bare minimum. By the way, isn't there an option to disable magic in auto-battles?
In reply to Supric
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Supric
Well, of course, I control the mana during auto-battles. If I'm playing as a Barbarian, I try not to take spells at all, only the bare minimum. By the way, isn't magic disabled in the auto-battle options?
It can be disabled. Although, it would be better if the developers reworked the AI.
In reply to Supric
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Supric
By the way, isn't there an option to disable magic in auto-battle?
It can be disabled, and there are no mana issues:p.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: recijeb