Skip to content

Posts from In your opinion, what is the best real-time strategy game? Auto-translated

1.0 (1 rating)
Open
In your opinion, what is the best real-time strategy game?
15 voters
Single choice Public votes
Sign in to participate in this poll.
Poll results will be visible after you vote or when the poll closes.
User Avatar
#49
Auto-translated
But will you actually play it now?

Quite possibly. I have it, as well as a console emulator.
The interface is awful: to build a building, buy a unit, or even repair something, you absolutely have to go into its personal menu and click on the corresponding icon. "Attack," "move," "stop" – isn't that convenient? And moving a group of tanks from one end of the map to the other is a truly wonderful and unforgettable experience.

And what, do you want everything served to you on a silver platter? It's a game, yes, you have to go into the menu, you have to click a button; it's not for the lazy. I don't understand the issue with the group of tanks at all; everything is selected freely with a frame.
Do you even know the meaning of this word? Or are you just randomly throwing it around, hoping to hit the mark?

That's just ridiculous. Even the youngest schoolchild knows about this word, and you simply have nothing to say
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения!
И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день



In reply to Саня Изи
User Avatar
#50
Auto-translated
What, do you want everything served on a silver platter? It's a game, yes, you have to log in, you have to click a button, it's not for the lazy. I don't understand the "pack of tanks" thing at all; everything can be selected freely with a frame.
Lol, with a frame on Sega?
Why Dune 2 when there's Dune 2000? Everything is much more convenient there. Or Emperor, where the factions are also better developed.

Even the youngest schoolchild knows that, but you, apparently, don't, since you keep mentioning it here and there without any reason.
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
User Avatar
#51
Auto-translated
Why play Dune 2 when Dune 2000 exists?

Complete garbage. Why play THIS when Dune 2 is available? By the way, I threw the disc away a couple of days after buying it.
Lol, is it framed on the Sega?

Imagine that. You hold down a button and draw around it.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения!
И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день



In reply to Саня Изи
User Avatar
#52
Auto-translated
Well, give me some arguments – why is Dune 2000 complete garbage?
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
User Avatar
#53
Auto-translated
Annoying. I don't remember exactly, but since I threw it away, there must have been a good reason. I only remember the outdated graphics, some blocky tanks, and constant freezes and loading times from the CD-ROM.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения!
И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день



In reply to Саня Изи
User Avatar
#54
Auto-translated
Yes, of course, since you discarded it, it must have been bad. What can you say? Yes.
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
User Avatar
#55
Auto-translated
So, what did you think?

Alright, Wissy, you've intrigued me, I'll try playing D2000 again, maybe I'll like it.

Added 45 minutes later
Nope, I won't play it. It didn't even want to go for experience.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения!
И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день



User Avatar
#57
Auto-translated
Because I like C&C more.
I'm not saying that Dune 2 is bad, I'm saying that it's outdated. Even if you could ignore the graphics, or even the sometimes-stupid AI, the interface itself ruins everything. After the incredibly convenient C&C or later Dune games, or even Warcraft, playing the second Dune game just isn't enjoyable. Preferences, preferences, would you play it now?
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
User Avatar
#58
Auto-translated
The only problem with Emperor for me is the boring campaign; they couldn't make it like in Science. At first, it seems promising, but then it just fades away.
And as for the second one, I've played it enough on Sega, and it feels like a wooden leg instead of a whole, healthy foot. Although, it's worth noting that I generally dislike consoles – both modern and old ones.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
User Avatar
#60
Auto-translated
I don't know, I think it's fine. There's just as much story there, it's just presented more concisely.
There are only a few "story" missions, literally three to five, the rest are about capturing territory on the map or defending. Considering that after a few missions all the technologies are already unlocked, attacking and defending in essentially simple skirmish maps starts to get boring. I even got to the point where, when attacking, I would select all the troops and immediately rush the enemy, and when defending, I would set up some cheap tanks or infantry and do the same thing.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
In reply to Happy Life
User Avatar
#61
Auto-translated
I played on the hardest difficulty and persevered.
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
User Avatar
#62
Auto-translated
It seems like the computer builds faster on a hard drive.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
User Avatar
#64
Auto-translated
A tank wedge composed of either early-game or late-game units always dominated in Westwood's strategy games.
These are the words of a hater or someone who is not knowledgeable.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
In reply to Happy Life
User Avatar
#65
Auto-translated
It not only builds faster, but also performs quite well in battles.
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
User Avatar
#67
Auto-translated
And is a tank rush weak against Yuri?
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made