Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Mafia: general discussions.Auto-translated
It's getting more and more absurd and ridiculous. Soon, every word will be taken as an insult?
And yes, who is this brave soul who registered a clone account and wrote to me in a private message? Couldn't they have done it with their main account? Oh well, these are adults after all.
He called my actions "disgusting" => i.e., I am referred to as "oink-oink").
He gave unpleasant characteristics to everyone who voted against creating topics other than Jack's. I have my reasons, Ney, please forgive me. I'm tired of trying to reason with you.
Отдай свои прошлые сны, В сомненьях себя обрети, В бешеном танце душа кружится! Не думай, что будет потом, Здесь и сейчас мы живем, Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!
I mostly just criticized your violent actions against the "mafia" and the "workshop." As for your and Tox's leftist topics, I, like most people, didn't really care.
So, the difference now is in the majority? If half of the players don't need the topic, then it can be removed. In that case, we can conduct a poll among the players in the Heroes forum and ask if they need a mafia section. After all, this is a Heroes forum, and what is the point of having a section that is not related to Heroes and disrupts the system? Almost none of them play mafia, and they don't need this section. Maybe we should remove it, since most people don't need it.
He called my actions disgusting => i.e., I am referred to as "oink-oink").
Отдай свои прошлые сны, В сомненьях себя обрети, В бешеном танце душа кружится! Не думай, что будет потом, Здесь и сейчас мы живем, Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!
So, the difference now is in the majority? If one half of the players doesn't need the topic, then it can be removed. In that case, we can conduct a poll among the Heroes players and ask if they need a Mafia section? This is a Heroes forum, and why is there a section here that is not related to Heroes and disrupts the system? Almost none of them play Mafia, and they don't need this section. Maybe we should remove it, because the majority doesn't need it.
You're going to extremes again... Okay, it's not that important right now. I'm curious to see how you'll handle the periodic editing of topics if option #1 wins in the poll.
Отдай свои прошлые сны, В сомненьях себя обрети, В бешеном танце душа кружится! Не думай, что будет потом, Здесь и сейчас мы живем, Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!
lol. I gave an example with the "Mafia" section for those who aren't interested in my topic, to show the absurdity of your arguments. Both situations are the same, but opinions are divided because my example touches upon your interests.
I'm curious to see how you'll handle periodically editing topics if option #1 wins in the poll.
Well, I don't even know. Changing the topic title is very difficult, and it takes a whole hour.
And yes, who was the brave soul who registered a clone account and sent me a private message? Couldn't this have been done with the main account? Oh well, these are adults after all.
:smile52: That was hilarious.
So, the difference now is in the majority? If half of the players don't need a topic, then it can be deleted.
The topics that you and Tox created are simply unnecessary, and everyone can do without them. It's not about the opinion of the majority, but about the fact that we already have a workshop where this issue is actually discussed. Regarding the topics that you deleted, you not only exceeded your powers as a moderator, but you also acted like a child. If Slo and Zu acted according to the rules, which can be interpreted in any way, then you simply acted like a jerk and violated the rules. And again, right now, we are not even discussing the problem of deleting your topics, but the problem of your ego being over 9000.
However, I cannot simply accept the sanctions against Revan. Yes, he expressed his constructive opinion in a somewhat rude manner towards some, but that doesn't mean he should be penalized for it. Everyone here expresses their thoughts about a particular situation, but I don't like that only Reinhardt received a penalty for it.
Some can manage, while others can't. What now? Are we going to discriminate against those who act differently? What rules were they following? "It's hard for us to adapt; she's disrupting our system" – are these the rules? As for the workshop and the mafia, I restored the topics, and nothing happened to them. I just wanted to demonstrate and let people feel what it's like when your topic is deleted. My topic, however, remains in the trash, and Revan is still banned. This is a real abuse of power and an absurd interpretation of the rules to serve one's own interests.
He called my actions "pigsty behavior" => i.e., I am referred to as "oink-oink."
I called Arandor's actions "asshole behavior" => i.e., he is referred to as an "asshole." And it wasn't just about that; I also wrote some not-so-nice things about Arandor, regarding his actions. So, shouldn't I have received points too? I'm not even mentioning the threats regarding the database when we had a disagreement about the GM rotation. And of course, I'm not bringing up other examples.
Everyone here shares their thoughts on a particular situation, but I don't like that I only received a Reinhard for that.
I can analyze everyone. But his post contained rude remarks directed at me, so he received points.
Yes, he expressed his constructive opinion in a somewhat rude manner towards some, but that doesn't mean he should be penalized with points for it.
Nay, what should the points be awarded for then? To engage in an argument with him? To ask him to tone it down? Of course, one can turn a blind eye to all such posts, be lenient, etc. But everyone's patience has its limits.
Отдай свои прошлые сны, В сомненьях себя обрети, В бешеном танце душа кружится! Не думай, что будет потом, Здесь и сейчас мы живем, Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!
My topic was deleted – I deleted the topic in response.
Revan expressed his opinion – he was banned.
You can't do without self-esteem, but without this topic. Don't confuse them.
I probably know better whether I need the topic or not. It is definitely not up to some "adults" with quirks to decide.
Topics are like clones. And you've already been told that.
The moderators are like that...
That's nonsense, not an argument. What does "similar" mean? This is not a clone topic, and therefore it has the right to exist. It would be different if I created Workshop #2; then, deleting it would be justified.
And in the end, he showed himself in a bad light, well done.
For whom? For berries from the same bush? Well, yes, they would have a completely different opinion now.
I called Arandor’s actions foolish => i.e., I referred to him as a “fool.” And I didn’t just write not-so-nice things about Arandor; I also wrote not-so-nice things about his actions. So, shouldn’t I have received points too? I’m not even mentioning the threats regarding the database, when we had an argument about the order of GMs. And, of course, I’m not bringing up other examples.
Arandor is a moderator, and he can give you points himself if he deems it necessary. As for others, there is a function called “report a violation to the moderator.” If someone doesn’t like the words directed at them and considers them offensive, feel free to click it, and we’ll sort it out. I can’t arbitrarily create violations because communication is sometimes peculiar, and it’s hard to tell whether it was a joke or a genuine insult. This is initially a matter between the two parties in the dialogue. In the case of a ban, I was one of the parties in the dialogue. Therefore, the actions followed immediately. Everything is quite trivial and simple. There is no arbitrariness.
Отдай свои прошлые сны, В сомненьях себя обрети, В бешеном танце душа кружится! Не думай, что будет потом, Здесь и сейчас мы живем, Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!
Нэйко
Zybr
