Posts from Mafia: general discussions. Auto-translated

Do you think it's nice to see all this mess in a forum thread?
Why don't you take it to private messages.

It's funny to hear that from... from... =[/QUOTE]

From whom? Continue.

Yes, I know.

What a telling silence from all the opponents of polls, after the posts by Morny and Vis. This especially applies to the girls who don't create topics.

My dear, do you really think that I spend all my time staring at the screen and biting my nails in nervous tension, frantically trying to figure out what other arguments I can bring to convey to Ara the full depth and tragedy of my point of view? )) WHAT??? DID YOU REALLY THINK THAT???? I have some bad news for you, buddy: I spend a lot of time in real life, and, to be honest, I haven't even thought about you and your worn-out topic for the last four or five hours.

No response to messages. Okay, I understand. Next?

Arandor, do you enjoy conflicts so much? Just sit back and be glad that everyone is tired of this nonsense and things have become more peaceful.

They seem to vent all their frustration and dissatisfaction during the match. It's a shame.

They could have at least warned Arandor, and me, about this.

Why?
We, two people, decided that your topics are not needed. They are hindering us from navigating the section and violating our established rules.

So, what did it all start with? It started with the fact that it became difficult for me to read the "Workshop," and it became completely impossible for me to use it to estimate the potential number of participants.
But Tox created a second topic. This topic is of little use to me.

Well, okay, from light sarcasm to the point.

it was decided by me and Slonysh to move

And who are you, actually? Typical players of this section, no different from the others. On this forum, there is only one person who has the right to use the admin panel regarding situations that do not fall under the forum rules. But since he doesn't have enough time, for convenience, such issues are often resolved by users (by creating polls, as is happening now), and the moderator simply carries out their will, so to speak.
In this section, there can be a million topics related to settings or anything else, even if it is only remotely related to the Mafia, and no one can, in one or two people, make decisions about whether they are worthy of existence or not.

In fact, there were no arguments from Zubr, Slonysh, and Gil, only whining that Arandor deleted the topics in response.
They only wrote about creating clone topics. In this case, this is just a subjective opinion. One could confidently talk about the similarity of the topics only if they pursued the same goals (the author has repeatedly explained the difference between his topic, and its necessity in general), not to mention that the topic was temporary. The quantity does not matter here.

I, for example, do not need to create such topics, but someone needs them. Is there a problem with that?

And this, why did you ruin the topic by moving the poll there?

By the way, the current topic with the poll shows what the "community" really wants. Regarding the votes against:

Crabby, Dgak, Gil4, Slonysh, Xostor, Zybr

The last four are birds of a feather, and Crabby just doesn't like Arandor. That's the deal.

Oh yes, I almost forgot. It's very mean to recruit players in private messages, without registration. "Only the players I like will play in my game!" and to hell with the fact that someone might want to play.
I am all for the GM having complete control over their own game and the topic with it, but in this case, if they really wanted to see only specific people in their game, they would have created it on some Yuku or somewhere else, and not clogged up the queue here.
Right now, it would be very useful to run some kind of game in parallel. If I had a stable internet connection, I would do it, and I would definitely find players for the game.

If I had a stable internet connection, I would have done it already, and I would definitely find players to play with.

I would play, anyway, I'm already dead lol.

Actually, I think it's time to stop discussing this topic with thread deletions. Because, in general, both sides are wrong. And what's happening here now, I'd call it more of a post-padding exercise than a debate for the ages. We criticized the moderators, we criticized Arandor, and that's where we can end it. It just gave fuel for creating a poll, which in the future may help GMs who are unsure of themselves.

Reinhard, thanks for not giving me a description! I'm afraid to imagine what it would be like.

If it's that important, I'll say: "polls are not needed, even for Arandor" - in my opinion, this is the most adequate option, because there is not much point in bringing it back (if they just bring it back, that's okay, but there will be another argument). Besides, the concept is more or less clear, and it seems like enough people have gathered. And even if they hadn't, they would have. But polls are not needed for this. The workshop is for that. If you want to know how many people there are, it's easier to write to them in a private message or wait for the recruitment. As for the set, that's up to the GM, and only he should balance and create the set. Other players will see it in the game.

and what was the reason for Revan's ban?
did they find some kind of offense?
probably it's in the same category as the word "anal," which Zubr made me delete because, in his opinion, it was a swear word (or something else), and not a generally accepted term.

Usually for insults.

Added after 34 seconds
Here is your "freedom of speech."

and after that, you agree with these "moderators"?

He has long had over 100 violation points. Any point sends him to a ban. I flagged this:

The last four are berries from the same bush.

This could also be flagged:

A bison.

(When addressing other users, I use nicknames that are not their original ones, in case the user does not like this type of address.) It could be for trolling, it could be for flaming - there are violations for every taste. Since he is so fiercely defending the letter of the law in his post, his post was evaluated according to the letter of the law.

I mostly just criticized your violent actions against the "mafia" and the "workshop." As for your and Tox's leftist topics, I, like most people, didn't really care. I said that the moderators were sometimes wrong, but you, too, are far from being an angel. The main thing now is that, I think, they didn't handle the situation with Revanka correctly.

and after that, you agree with these "moderators"?

What am I wrong about? :) Everything is in accordance with the rules.