Added 3 minutes later
You're judging others while ignoring your own flaws.
No need, I'm not wrong. I'm awesome.
The argument is over.

New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
You're judging others while ignoring your own flaws.
The argument is over.

I like how Lynx is looking for clues about Tengro's murderer. Especially when this great act of getting rid of the assassin was 100% committed by Kitsune.
Lynx, it seems they've already decided that a female pioneer-hacker visited Tox at night. He was in that block at the time.
Lynx, it seems they've already decided that a female pioneer-hacker visited Tox at night. He was in the block at that time.
A connection through Schopenhauer. It's not for nothing that there's a note with his quote in the wiki. And Links has a quote from Schopenhauer himself.
You don't tell me what to do) I found a clue about the maniac who gives one extra death. I urge you to execute the maniac so that everyone is better off. Also, why do I counter every one of your posts?
There's also an idea about this: "And the patent bears the name of a person who is no longer alive!" We look at Ment's signature and his first card, "More Alive Than the Living."
Not a Blocker, but a Cheater. It's in the note.
I didn't believe in notes anyway, and after you sentenced me to death based on them, I don't even want to read them.
It doesn't look like a block; he went somewhere instead of staying home, and he also took money, so it's logical that he went to play with the Shuler.
The Pioneer-Cracker block is described as an attempt, without specifying whether it was successful or not.
Basically, the problem with Lynx can be solved, so we won't execute him now (although I'm inclined to, Hostor revealed the clue very convincingly), and MMD will visit him tonight. If he doesn't kill him, the conclusion is obvious. Of course, the Devourer, if it's someone else, might specifically not kill him in order to frame Lynx, but in any case, we will avoid the Devourer's murder or prove Lynx's innocence.