Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
So, guys, this is all great, but the time is running out. In principle, as far as I remember the practice of fabricated evidence, Haven could have been framed, but then we need another option. I don't have any (I haven't figured out the GM's logic yet; you've been playing longer, you should know _how_ he provides clues). But in any case, if we set aside the chatter, what and who do we have, besides three-inch scratches on the door and the table?
"Мы не герои. Мы сильны. Мы упрямы. Мы стараемся соблюдать условия контракта. Но мы не умираем за проигравших." Костоправ
"Мы не поклонники честной игры, если ее можно избежать. Девиз Отряда – максимальная эффективность при минимальном риске." Костоправ
Why not? Maybe I choose based on marinades, not people. If I were Nera's navigator, she would definitely do the same if her intuition told her which marinade hides the admiral, or if she predicted her role by choosing a marinade. She could try the same with another. Why not? In this case, logic is not a good advisor at all. IMHO.
Choosing based on marinades is possible. If it's based on people, the chance is extremely small, even if it's random, because a person always has some degree of awareness in their randomness. Okay, let's drop this topic.ToX
Spear, if you're sure I'm not mafia, why are you so reluctant to execute Nebo? I think the evidence is obvious.
I'm confused that it's not directly related to the profile.
Teng, Thoriy had only played one game on Hv before this. The clues in it were complex, except for the one pointing to the peaceful character. Has Thoriy changed in the meantime...?
And yes, no one uses planted clues anymore. The last one was Register.
besides the three-inch scratches on the door and the table?
Wolverine? :) Seriously though, everyone seems to have weapons in their profile, and they're all three inches long. We need to look in a different direction.
I was looking at a mental avatar here – it’s a robot rabbit. I don’t remember from the cartoon, but it seems to have 4 fingers, 1 large one, and three – you could use those to grab the door. And 2.45 – claws. And in general, in the cartoon, this rabbit is like a Terminator-welder, level 5 xD
It was said as a joke, but this is exactly what I’m talking about: this kind of logic doesn’t suit all profiles. I think that’s how we should think. Just a little more seriously.
Isn't this just a reflection of Soviet totalitarian politics? And in the USSR, they used AKs for executions.
pedewikia
In the Soviet Union, execution by a single shot to the back of the head was the primary form of capital punishment. Executions were carried out with revolvers (most often Colts).
I think Thory would have done a Google search before presenting this clue.
Nyashechka Kavai
